Three years ago in the Washington Post,
Ken Adelman, formerly an assistant to Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld, promised
in Iraq." I wonder how Mr. Adelman feels about his promise today.
In his article, Adelman disparaged Brookings Institution military analysts
and the redoubtable Edward Luttwak for "fear-mongering." Adelman dismissed
concerns about U.S. casualties and unilateral action as misguided worries that
inspire inaction when it was perfectly clear, to Adelman at least, that Iraq's
Saddam "Hussein constitutes the number-one threat against American security
As for concerns about going it alone, "President
Bush does not need to amass rinky-dink nations as 'coalition partners' to convince
the Washington establishment that we're right."
The Washington establishment must be wondering today how it was convinced into
making such a fatal mistake. Iraq had no weapons of mass destruction. Saddam
Hussein had no terrorist links or involvement in the September 11 terror attack.
U.S. casualties (dead and wounded) now stand at 10 percent of the U.S. invasion
force. A few thousand lightly armed insurgents have tied down eight U.S. divisions.
Iraq's infrastructure lies in ruins. Fallujah, once a city of 300,000, has been
destroyed. The U.S. has lost control of the roads, and most of the U.S. fighting
force is confined to protecting supply lines and its own bases. The U.S. military
is cracking under the strain of prolonged service in the field. The cost of
the war mounts, putting more pressure on a collapsing U.S. dollar. The U.S. occupation
has recruited thousands of new terrorists for Osama bin Laden and provided a
training ground. Torture and torture memos have destroyed America's moral reputation.
Civil war looms as neither Sunnis, Shi'ites, nor Kurds are willing to support
a government they do not control. Anti-American feelings throughout the Middle
East threaten to undermine the secular puppets that the U.S. keeps afloat in Pakistan,
Egypt, and Jordan. There is no light at the end of the tunnel. Generals speak
of staying another three, five, seven, and 10 years in order "to get the job done."
If this is a cakewalk, what is a failed invasion and a lost war?
Where Mr. Adelman, the neoconservatives, the Pentagon, the White House, the
flag-wavers, and the media went wrong was in thinking the outcome would be settled
by a set-piece battle between massed Iraqi and U.S. forces. They thought this
because they knew nothing whatsoever about Iraq.
The Sunni-controlled Iraqi military chose insurgency as the strategy. Suck
the invader in and make him unsafe on every street and in every building. Blow
him up in his own fortified bases.
Their strategy has worked. Ours has failed.
The question is: are Americans smart enough to realize this? Our government
is not smart enough. The occupant of the Oval Office is drowning in hubris and
delusion. The neoconservatives are still in charge of the Bush administration,
and they are still talking fantasies about taking out Iran and Syria and imposing
our will on the Middle East. This is extraordinary delusion when we have conclusively
demonstrated that we cannot even impose our will on Fallujah, not even after
leveling the city to the ground. We cannot even impose our will on the road
from Baghdad to the airport.
The promised Iraqi election, if held, will settle nothing. If it is not a total
disaster, it might provide cover for U.S. withdrawal, not piecemeal but all at
once. If 150,000 U.S. troops are in jeopardy, piecemeal withdrawal will place
remaining troops in more jeopardy.
Americans must ask themselves where lies our biggest problem? Is it the Iraqi
insurgency, or is it President Bush who will not admit a mistake?
How long will we bleed in Iraq? How many war crimes will we commit in frustration
with an invisible enemy? How intense will Muslim hatred of Americans become?
At what point will this hatred unseat our puppets and deliver the Middle East
to Osama bin Laden or his equivalent? Three more years? Five more years? We
certainly cannot get away with it for seven or 10 more years.
The U.S. invasion of Iraq was a strategic blunder. It has greatly damaged U.S.
credibility, while greatly enhancing Osama bin Laden's credibility.
Who will provide the desperately needed leadership that will rescue America
from this self-inflicted catastrophe?