After three years of war in Iraq, reporting and
debate continue to ignore the key fact: The U.S. invasion was a mistake.
President Bush himself acknowledges this. He says the war was based on intelligence
and the intelligence was wrong. So, then, what is right about the war? If we
believe Bush, he would not have taken America and Iraq to war if he had been
given correct, instead of incorrect, intelligence about Iraqi weapons of mass
destruction and connections to al-Qaeda.
In view of this, why is Bush intent on continuing the war? Why is it important
to win a war that should not have happened and only happened because U.S. intelligence
The war is extremely expensive. It has cost thousands of dead and maimed Americans
and tens of thousands of dead and maimed Iraqis. The war has already cost $200-$300
billion and is being financed by foreign borrowing. Distinguished economists
put the long term cost of the war to the U.S. in the $1-2 trillion range.
This is an enormous sum to spend on a war that President Bush says is based
on mistaken intelligence. Why, then, does Bush continue to fight the war?
The mistaken war has damaged America's reputation, harmed our alliances, enraged
Muslims against us, and radicalized Middle Eastern politics. The CIA reports
that the war has provided al-Qaeda with recruitment and a training ground. The
U.S. military is trying to ascertain whether its attempted occupation of Iraq
is creating insurgents faster than they are being killed.
In view of the available facts, how can Bush in his State of the Union address
tell Congress and the world that the U.S. is winning in Iraq? Why did Congress
stand and applaud? What does it mean to win a war that should not have been
Having admitted that his invasion of Iraq is based on incorrect intelligence,
why did Bush claim in his State of the Union address that his war in Iraq is
central to the war against terrorism? He must mean that his mistake created
terrorism where it did not exist, and, having created the terrorism, he must
now fight it even if doing so creates yet more terrorists.
A rational response to Bush's mistake would be to remove the cause of the insurgency
by apologizing for the mistake and withdrawing U.S. military forces. Neoconservatives
say that the U.S. cannot withdraw because Iraq would fall into civil war. This
is an admission that by removing Saddam Hussein, Bush created the conditions
for civil war in Iraq. How, then, was removing Saddam Hussein a good thing?
The U.S. invasion and occupation of Iraq have destroyed Iraq's infrastructure,
entire villages and towns, families, careers, and public safety. What America
has done to Iraq is a monstrous crime. And Bush says it is because of a mistake
A mistake in intelligence in more ways than one.
It is extraordinary that after admitting to erroneously starting a war, Bush
wants to do it all over again – this time against a more formidable foe, Iran.
America's adulation of ignorance gives Bush a free hand to repeat his mistake
on a larger scale. Karl Rove used 9/11 to recast Bush as the archetypal hero
vowing retribution on those who struck at innocent America. Enamored of this
role, Americans have ceased to think.
There is no sign of intelligence or accurate reporting on Iran in the newspapers,
on television or even over PBS radio. It is never made clear that Iran's "defiance"
is one orchestrated by the U.S. government, or that the "defiance"
is limited to Iran's development of nuclear energy, not a weapons program. When
Americans hear "nuclear defiance" over and over, they conclude that
Iran is making nuclear weapons. Instead of informing the people, the media drive
them toward acceptance of another war.
Bush has been picking a fight with Iran for a long time. He declared Iran to
be part of an "axis of evil." He constantly demonizes Iran and threatens
Iran with sanctions and military attack. Israel announced that if Bush doesn't
attack Iran, Israel will. Bush disrupted Iran's cooperation with the International
Atomic Energy Agency, whose inspectors have found no weapons program in Iran.
The media misreport it all as Iran's bad behavior, bad behavior that reflects
The explosive situation in the Middle East needs to be defused, not aggravated.
The United States gains nothing by confirming its image as the hegemonic Great
Nothing is gained by the deaths and maiming of thousands and tens of thousands
more people whose lives are thrown away to the purposes of blind propaganda.
Nothing is gained by the U.S. wasting more hundreds of billions dollars that
are desperately needed for important and legitimate purposes.
Nothing is gained by the U.S. pressuring with threats and bribes other countries
to line up with what they know to be a wrong and dangerous policy.
Nothing is gained by endangering oil flows and a Western transportation system
dependent on the internal combustion engine.
Bush's approach is insane. It serves no legitimate purpose. There is no reason
Why is it happening?