Politics Blair’s
duplicity may be deliberate, or he may just change his mind a
lot Peter Oborne
The British political cycle has entered a disreputable period
from which there is no obvious sign that it will ever emerge.
Political leadership, as Nigel Lawson remarked at the St Ermin’s
hotel, is about making a decision and then creating the consensus.
Tony Blair has lost that gift. The future will belong to the
political leader — perhaps Gordon Brown, maybe Michael Howard — who
can recapture it.
John Major reacted with pleasing urgency to my observation, made
here last week, that he held back from airing private reservations
about Iraq because of close connections with the Bush family. By
Sunday morning the former prime minister was on Breakfast with
Frost, airing doubts about the deployment of British troops outside
Basra. What followed is fascinating. Within hours an emissary from
the Bush machine was on the phone, voicing dismay and urging John
Major to pipe down. This curious little episode demonstrates the
naivety of claims made by many Blairite commentators that the new
British military deployment was of no political interest to
President George W. Bush. The British debate is actually the object
of anxious fascination, as the Bush camp’s attention to detail in
the case of John Major shows.
page 1
2 <<
previous
• Email this article to a friend • Send
a comment on this article to the editor of
spectator.co.uk | |