{"id":10125,"date":"2011-06-17T04:15:34","date_gmt":"2011-06-17T12:15:34","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/?p=10125"},"modified":"2011-06-17T04:55:44","modified_gmt":"2011-06-17T12:55:44","slug":"nato-pilots-face-high-risks-in-libya","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/2011\/06\/17\/nato-pilots-face-high-risks-in-libya\/","title":{"rendered":"NATO Pilots Face High Risks in Libya"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><a href=\"http:\/\/english.aljazeera.net\/video\/africa\/2011\/06\/20116179512683704.html\">Via al Jazeera<\/a>:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>There [is] a significant threat to every aircraft landing in Libya, a danger which became apparent when surface to air missiles and launchers were found recently in the hands of a pro-Gaddafi cell hiding in the rebel-held city of Benghazi.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p><object width=\"640\" height=\"390\"><param name=\"movie\" value=\"http:\/\/www.youtube.com\/v\/APnyWVuNX7c&#038;hl=en_US&#038;feature=player_embedded&#038;version=3\"><\/param><param name=\"allowFullScreen\" value=\"true\"><\/param><param name=\"allowScriptAccess\" value=\"always\"><\/param><\/object><\/p>\n<p>This seems to damage the <a href=\"http:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/2011\/06\/15\/libya-war-is-legal-because-technically-were-not-involved\/\">Obama administration&#8217;s<\/a> <a href=\"http:\/\/news.antiwar.com\/2011\/06\/16\/american-wars-will-be-increasingly-secret\/\">legal position<\/a> that U.S. military engagement in Libya does not endanger our armed forces and falls short of true hostilities.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Via al Jazeera: There [is] a significant threat to every aircraft landing in Libya, a danger which became apparent when surface to air missiles and launchers were found recently in the hands of a pro-Gaddafi cell hiding in the rebel-held city of Benghazi. This seems to damage the Obama administration&#8217;s legal position that U.S. military [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":86,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_seopress_robots_primary_cat":"","_seopress_titles_title":"","_seopress_titles_desc":"","_seopress_robots_index":"","_et_pb_use_builder":"","_et_pb_old_content":"","_et_gb_content_width":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3],"tags":[],"coauthors":[],"class_list":["post-10125","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-news"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"meta_box":{"disable_donate_message":"","custom_donate_message":"","subtitle":""},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/10125","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/86"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=10125"}],"version-history":[{"count":4,"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/10125\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":10134,"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/10125\/revisions\/10134"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=10125"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=10125"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=10125"},{"taxonomy":"author","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/coauthors?post=10125"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}