{"id":1103,"date":"2004-06-29T16:40:53","date_gmt":"2004-06-29T23:40:53","guid":{"rendered":""},"modified":"2004-06-29T16:40:53","modified_gmt":"2004-06-29T23:40:53","slug":"the-kids-are-all-wrong","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/2004\/06\/29\/the-kids-are-all-wrong\/","title":{"rendered":"The Kids Are All Wrong"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>On the verge of his departure from <i>National Review<\/i>, William F. Buckley sends a message to the snotty punks now running his magazine:<\/p>\n<ul>Mr. Buckley said there was a growing debate on the right about how the war in Iraq squared with the traditional conservative conviction that American foreign policy should seek only to protect its vital interests. <\/p>\n<p>&#8220;With the benefit of minute hindsight, Saddam Hussein wasn&#8217;t the kind of extra-territorial menace that was assumed by the administration one year ago,&#8221; Mr. Buckley said. &#8220;If I knew then what I know now about what kind of situation we would be in, I would have opposed the war.&#8221;<\/ul>\n<p>Disingenuous, no doubt \u2013 did any intelligent person really consider Saddam a danger to the U.S.? \u2013 but a sign of how badly things are going. (From the <a href=http:\/\/www.nytimes.com\/2004\/06\/29\/politics\/29buckley.html?ei=5062&#038;en=2ba1c0ae86ab4208&#038;ex=1089086400&#038;partner=GOOGLE&#038;pagewanted=print&#038;position=><i>NYT<\/i><\/a>.)<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>On the verge of his departure from National Review, William F. Buckley sends a message to the snotty punks now running his magazine: Mr. Buckley said there was a growing debate on the right about how the war in Iraq squared with the traditional conservative conviction that American foreign policy should seek only to protect [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":15,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_seopress_robots_primary_cat":"","_seopress_titles_title":"","_seopress_titles_desc":"","_seopress_robots_index":"","_et_pb_use_builder":"","_et_pb_old_content":"","_et_gb_content_width":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[],"tags":[676],"coauthors":[],"class_list":["post-1103","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","tag-antiwar-movement"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"meta_box":{"disable_donate_message":"","custom_donate_message":"","subtitle":""},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1103","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/15"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1103"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1103\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1103"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1103"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1103"},{"taxonomy":"author","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/coauthors?post=1103"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}