{"id":11508,"date":"2011-09-07T13:39:30","date_gmt":"2011-09-07T21:39:30","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/?p=11508"},"modified":"2011-09-07T13:39:30","modified_gmt":"2011-09-07T21:39:30","slug":"the-imperial-mentality-and-911","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/2011\/09\/07\/the-imperial-mentality-and-911\/","title":{"rendered":"The Imperial Mentality and 9\/11"},"content":{"rendered":"

Editor’s note: On Tuesday, we linked to an excerpt of a Noam Chomsky essay from a forthcoming book. TomDispatch has a longer excerpt, which is linked to below.<\/em><\/p>\n

This is, of course, the week before the tenth anniversary of the day that \u201cchanged everything.\u201d\u00a0 And enough was indeed changed that it\u2019s easy to forget what that lost world was like.\u00a0 Here\u2019s a little reminder of that moment just before September 11, 2001:<\/p>\n

The “usually disengaged” president, as New York Times<\/em> columnist Maureen Dowd labeled him, had just returned from a prolonged, brush-cutting Crawford vacation to much criticism and a nation in trouble. (One Republican congressman complained that “it was hard for Mr. Bush to get his message out if the White House lectern had a ‘Gone Fishing’ sign on it.”) Democrats were on the attack. Journalistic coverage seemed to grow ever bolder. Bush’s poll figures were dropping. A dozen prominent Republicans, fearful of a president out of touch with the national mood, gathered for a private dinner with Karl Rove to “offer an unvarnished critique of Mr. Bush’s style and strategy.” Next year’s congressional elections suddenly seemed up for grabs. The president’s aides were desperately scrambling to reposition him as a more “commanding” figure, while, according to the polls, a majority of Americans felt the country was headed in the wrong direction. At the Pentagon, Donald Rumsfeld had “cratered”; in the Middle East “violence was rising.”<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

That\u2019s a taste of the lost world of September 6-10, 2001 — a moment when the news was dominated by nothing more catastrophic than shark attacks off the Florida and North Carolina coasts — in a passage from a piece (\u201cShark-Bit World<\/a>\u201d) I wrote back in 2005 when that world was already beyond recovery.\u00a0 A few days later, we would enter a very American hell, one from which we\u2019ve never emerged, with George W. Bush and Dick Cheney leading the way.\u00a0 Almost a decade later, Osama bin Laden may be dead, but his American legacy<\/a> lives on fiercely in Washington policy when it comes to surveillance, secrecy, war, and the national security state (as well as economic meltdown at home).<\/p>\n

This week, TomDispatch will attempt to assess that legacy, starting with this post by Noam Chomsky.\u00a0 It\u2019s a half-length excerpt from a new \u201cpreface\u201d — actually a major reassessment of America\u2019s war-on-terror decade — part of Seven Stories Press\u2019s 10th anniversary reissue of his bestseller on 9\/11.\u00a0 Titled 9-11: Was There an Alternative?<\/em><\/a>, its official publication date is this Thursday, and it includes the full version of the new essay, as well as the entire text of the older book.\u00a0 It can be purchased as an e-book<\/a> and is being put out simultaneously in numerous languages including French, Spanish, and Italian. Thanks to the editors at Seven Stories, TomDispatch is releasing this excerpt<\/a> exclusively, but be sure to get yourself a copy of the book for the complete version.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Editor’s note: On Tuesday, we linked to an excerpt of a Noam Chomsky essay from a forthcoming book. TomDispatch has a longer excerpt, which is linked to below. This is, of course, the week before the tenth anniversary of the day that \u201cchanged everything.\u201d\u00a0 And enough was indeed changed that it\u2019s easy to forget what […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":47,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_seopress_robots_primary_cat":"","_seopress_titles_title":"","_seopress_titles_desc":"","_seopress_robots_index":"","_et_pb_use_builder":"","_et_pb_old_content":"","_et_gb_content_width":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3],"tags":[],"coauthors":[],"class_list":["post-11508","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-news"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"meta_box":{"disable_donate_message":"","custom_donate_message":"","subtitle":""},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/11508","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/47"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=11508"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/11508\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":11510,"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/11508\/revisions\/11510"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=11508"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=11508"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=11508"},{"taxonomy":"author","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/coauthors?post=11508"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}