Sunday of Week 1. A time when American football fans are used to being asked the question “how ’bout them Cowboys?” but this year those who tuned in were treated to a heavy dose of “how ’bout them multiple, open-ended military occupations?”<\/p>\n
For the first time since the multi-hour pregame show at Super Bowl XXXVI (which I am convinced continues on in some particularly grim circle of hell), the 9\/11 references were so prevalent and indeed so heavy-handed that they rendered professional football virtually unwatchable.<\/p>\n
While the games in New York and Washington might have been forgiven for cashing in a bit during halftime shows, the effort which announcers put in to bringing up 9\/11 at any opportunity and during any game was simply overwhelming. Every play was spun as allegory for America’s post-9\/11 reaction.<\/p>\n
The Lions fumble the ball and recover their own fumble? Just like America recovered after the tragedy lo’ those many years ago. Player’s wife just gave birth to a child? That’s sad because all those people who were killed on 9\/11, some of them had kids too you know.<\/p>\n
The announcers during the Buccaneers-Lions game even took a break for a self-congratulatory moment, declaring that football had been instrumental in the “healing process” for America after 9\/11. <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Sunday of Week 1. A time when American football fans are used to being asked the question “how ’bout them Cowboys?” but this year those who tuned in were treated to a heavy dose of “how ’bout them multiple, open-ended military occupations?” For the first time since the multi-hour pregame show at Super Bowl XXXVI […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":32,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_seopress_robots_primary_cat":"","_seopress_titles_title":"","_seopress_titles_desc":"","_seopress_robots_index":"","_et_pb_use_builder":"","_et_pb_old_content":"","_et_gb_content_width":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3],"tags":[],"coauthors":[],"class_list":["post-11561","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-news"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"meta_box":{"disable_donate_message":"","custom_donate_message":"","subtitle":""},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/11561","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/32"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=11561"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/11561\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":11563,"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/11561\/revisions\/11563"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=11561"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=11561"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=11561"},{"taxonomy":"author","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/coauthors?post=11561"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}