{"id":11573,"date":"2011-09-12T08:35:31","date_gmt":"2011-09-12T16:35:31","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/?p=11573"},"modified":"2011-09-12T08:46:18","modified_gmt":"2011-09-12T16:46:18","slug":"the-creeping-militarization-of-civil-life","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/2011\/09\/12\/the-creeping-militarization-of-civil-life\/","title":{"rendered":"The Creeping Militarization of Civil Life"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Radley Balko, simply one of the best journalists around, has <a href=\"http:\/\/www.huffingtonpost.com\/2011\/09\/12\/police-militarization-9-11-september-11_n_955508.html\">a new piece up at the Huffington Post<\/a> on the militarization of domestic police departments, especially since 9\/11. Unsurprisingly, the numbers show the terrorist attacks served merely as a pretext for the power-grabbing martial response, which was directed mostly at Americans.<\/p>\n<blockquote><p><em>New York<\/em>\u00a0magazine\u00a0<a href=\"http:\/\/nymag.com\/news\/9-11\/10th-anniversary\/patriot-act\/\" target=\"_hplink\">reported some telling figures<\/a>\u00a0last month on how delayed-notice search warrants &#8212; also known as &#8220;sneak-and-peek&#8221; warrants &#8212; have been used in recent years. Though passed with the PATRIOT Act and justified as a much-needed weapon in the war on terrorism, the sneak-and-peek was used in a terror investigation just 15 times between 2006 and 2009. In drug investigations, however, it was used more than 1,600 times during the same period.<\/p>\n<p>&#8230;September 11 also brought a new source of funding for military-grade equipment in the Department of Homeland Security. In recent years,\u00a0<a href=\"http:\/\/jalopnik.com\/5720776\/why-do-americas-police-need-an-armored-tank\" target=\"_hplink\">the agency has given<\/a>\u00a0anti-terrorism grants to police agencies across the country to purchase armored personnel carriers, including\u00a0<a href=\"http:\/\/www.theagitator.com\/2006\/08\/13\/more-bearcats-2\/\" target=\"_hplink\">such unlikely terrorism targets<\/a>\u00a0as Winnebago County, Wisconsin; Longview, Texas; Tuscaloosa County, Alabama; Canyon County, Idaho; Santa Fe, New Mexico;\u00a0<a href=\"http:\/\/www.lenconnect.com\/features\/x1270133240\/County-commission-to-decide-fate-of-sheriff-s-department-tank\" target=\"_hplink\">Adrian, Michigan<\/a>; and Chattanooga, Tennessee. When the Memphis suburb of Germantown, Tennessee &#8212; which claims to be one of the safest cities in the country &#8212; got its APC in 2006, its sheriff told the local paper that the acquisition would put the town at the &#8220;forefront&#8221; of homeland security preparedness.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>Read <a href=\"http:\/\/www.huffingtonpost.com\/2011\/09\/12\/police-militarization-9-11-september-11_n_955508.html\">the whole piece<\/a> for all the unsettling details. What Balko also includes is the steady rolling back of the Posse Comitatus Act, which basically prohibits the federal government from using the military for domestic law enforcement. I&#8217;ve written before about how <a href=\"http:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/2011\/08\/18\/pushing-the-military-in-latin-america\/\">US foreign policy towards Latin America diligently prevents there being any such limitations<\/a>. We strongly encourage and implement drug and law enforcement policies which bolster the military, causing all sorts of trouble for millions of ordinary Latin Americans. But Balko details the slow creep over the past few decades of the militarization of <em>American<\/em> police.<\/p>\n<p>Another creeping example of the blurring of the lines between the civil criminal sphere and the war zone is the yet-to-be-passed provision in an omnibus\u00a0Pentagon spending measure <a href=\"http:\/\/news.antiwar.com\/2011\/09\/08\/provision-would-shift-terror-cases-to-military\/\">that would shift all terrorism cases immediately into the military sphere<\/a>.\u00a0Under the law, which will be voted upon later this month, arrested\u00a0terror suspects would be placed under military custody rather than being left to civilian law enforcement agencies like the FBI. \u00a0As written, the measure wouldn\u2019t apply to American citizens, although that was supposed to be the case for Guantanamo too, despite <a href=\"Under the new law, arrested terror suspects would be placed under military custody rather than being left to civilian law enforcement agencies like the FBI.  As written, measure wouldn\u2019t apply to American citizens, but it would put the rights of large numbers of terror suspects at risk and has the creeping potential of being used to justify further abridgments of individual rights, possible against Americans.\">American citizens being held there without civilian trials<\/a>. If passed, legislation like this is just a first step to expanding such treatment to ordinary Americans for god knows what else.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Update:<\/strong>\u00a0I should have included (1) the fact that there are <a href=\"http:\/\/www.alternet.org\/world\/151356\/how_the_patriot_act_is_being_used_to_fight_the_drug_war_and_eavesdrop_on_journalists\">thousands of known instances of law breaking<\/a> by the government in PATRIOT Act law enforcement behavior and (2) the d<a href=\"http:\/\/www.washingtonpost.com\/world\/mexico-confirms-seeking-us-drone-help-in-drug-war\/2011\/03\/16\/ABbSEZg_story.html\">rone war has extended to the drug war<\/a> as well, perhaps the most spectacular illustration of war-on-terror-induced militarization of almost everything.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Radley Balko, simply one of the best journalists around, has a new piece up at the Huffington Post on the militarization of domestic police departments, especially since 9\/11. Unsurprisingly, the numbers show the terrorist attacks served merely as a pretext for the power-grabbing martial response, which was directed mostly at Americans. New York\u00a0magazine\u00a0reported some telling [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":86,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_seopress_robots_primary_cat":"","_seopress_titles_title":"","_seopress_titles_desc":"","_seopress_robots_index":"","_et_pb_use_builder":"","_et_pb_old_content":"","_et_gb_content_width":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3],"tags":[],"coauthors":[],"class_list":["post-11573","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-news"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"meta_box":{"disable_donate_message":"","custom_donate_message":"","subtitle":""},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/11573","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/86"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=11573"}],"version-history":[{"count":3,"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/11573\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":11575,"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/11573\/revisions\/11575"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=11573"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=11573"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=11573"},{"taxonomy":"author","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/coauthors?post=11573"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}