{"id":118,"date":"2003-09-25T15:46:07","date_gmt":"2003-09-25T22:46:07","guid":{"rendered":""},"modified":"2003-09-25T15:46:07","modified_gmt":"2003-09-25T22:46:07","slug":"not-a-dimes-worth-of-difference","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/2003\/09\/25\/not-a-dimes-worth-of-difference\/","title":{"rendered":"Not a Dime&#8217;s Worth of Difference"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Here&#8217;s <a href=\"http:\/\/www.weeklystandard.com\/Content\/Public\/Articles\/000\/000\/003\/157wjmhn.asp\" title=\"Fred Barnes slathering attention on Sen. Hillary Clinton\">Fred Barnes slathering attention on Sen. Hillary Clinton<\/a> on the Weekly Standard website: <\/p>\n<p><i>President Bush has a surprising defender of his contention that Saddam Hussein had weapons of mass destruction&#8211;Democratic Sen. Hillary Clinton of New York. &#8220;The intelligence from Bush 1 to Clinton to Bush 2 was consistent&#8221; in concluding Saddam had chemical and biological weapons and was trying to develop a nuclear capability, Clinton said this morning. And Saddam&#8217;s expulsion of weapons inspectors and &#8220;the behavior&#8221; of his regime &#8220;pointed to a continuing effort&#8221; to produce WMD, she added.<\/i><\/p>\n<p>Only the sort of boobs who find Hannity &#038; Colmes invigorating would be surprised by this. The War Party protects its own.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Here&#8217;s Fred Barnes slathering attention on Sen. Hillary Clinton on the Weekly Standard website: President Bush has a surprising defender of his contention that Saddam Hussein had weapons of mass destruction&#8211;Democratic Sen. Hillary Clinton of New York. &#8220;The intelligence from Bush 1 to Clinton to Bush 2 was consistent&#8221; in concluding Saddam had chemical and [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":15,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_seopress_robots_primary_cat":"","_seopress_titles_title":"","_seopress_titles_desc":"","_seopress_robots_index":"","_et_pb_use_builder":"","_et_pb_old_content":"","_et_gb_content_width":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[],"tags":[676],"coauthors":[],"class_list":["post-118","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","tag-antiwar-movement"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"meta_box":{"disable_donate_message":"","custom_donate_message":"","subtitle":""},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/118","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/15"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=118"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/118\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=118"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=118"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=118"},{"taxonomy":"author","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/coauthors?post=118"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}