{"id":11963,"date":"2011-09-28T11:28:40","date_gmt":"2011-09-28T19:28:40","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/?p=11963"},"modified":"2011-09-28T11:28:40","modified_gmt":"2011-09-28T19:28:40","slug":"get-ready-for-the-next-great-human-rights-crusade","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/2011\/09\/28\/get-ready-for-the-next-great-human-rights-crusade\/","title":{"rendered":"Get Ready for the Next Great Human Rights Crusade"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>A mere day after the forces of light and progress ensured that <a href=\"http:\/\/www.washingtonpost.com\/politics\/dadt-repeal-day-sparks-celebrations-by-supporters\/2011\/09\/20\/gIQA6wWxiK_print.html\">no American can be deprived of his or her God-given right to kill foreigners<\/a>, a new crisis of conscience emerged. A <em>Chicago Sun-Times<\/em> <a href=\"http:\/\/www.suntimes.com\/opinions\/7788515-474\/editorial-give-military-women-equal-abortion-rights.html\">editorial<\/a> from Sept. 21 has the details:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p><strong>Give military women equal abortion rights<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Every woman who gets health insurance though the federal government faces a ban on coverage for abortion. We don\u2019t support this policy, but the government at least allows for a few crucial and humane exceptions. For nearly every group, abortion is covered in the case of rape or incest.<\/p>\n<p>But one maddening and profoundly unfair outlier exists: the U.S. Department of Defense.<\/p>\n<p>If a U.S. servicewomen is raped \u2014 a shockingly frequent occurrence \u2014 she not only must navigate a sometimes sexist military culture as she attempts to get care and justice, she also must pay for the abortion herself.<\/p>\n<p>And because some overseas military bases don\u2019t provide abortions, this can include a costly flight home to find a doctor who will provide an abortion.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>So, before we go any further, this is most emphatically <em>not<\/em> about the right to an abortion.* It&#8217;s about who should pay for certain abortions, which is a topic for another site. What I&#8217;m interested in is the &#8220;shockingly frequent&#8221; rape that&#8217;s going on in our <a href=\"http:\/\/www.kpbs.org\/news\/2011\/jun\/23\/us-military-most-trusted-all-american-institutions\/\">most trusted institution<\/a>. Let&#8217;s read on:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>Servicewomen have lacked a rape exception since 1981, with a brief respite under President Bill Clinton. Meanwhile, the number of assaults against women have skyrocketed. In 2010, nearly 3,200 sexual assaults were reported in the military, a number that studies show represents just a fraction of total assaults. \u2026<\/p>\n<p>One young woman we spoke to, Jessica Kenyon, says she got no support and was ostracized after saying she was raped and sexually assaulted.<\/p>\n<p>Kenyon strongly supports the rape exception but worries women will continue to be left to fend for themselves.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cThere is so much torture when you report an assault,\u201d Kenyon told us. \u201cWhat will women have to do to prove they were raped?\u201d<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>Given the context \u2014 and everything we&#8217;ve learned since Abu Ghraib \u2014 is there any reason to believe that she&#8217;s using the word &#8220;torture&#8221; in a strictly figurative sense? Do these rapists hold themselves to a higher standard than the <a href=\"http:\/\/www.alternet.org\/world\/122341\">Army Field Manual<\/a>?<\/p>\n<p>That seems unlikely. So what we have here is an organization speckled with rapists and sadists who are so depraved that they can&#8217;t even keep their hands (and other parts) off their comrades \u2014 yet this doesn&#8217;t raise any broader concerns for the <em>Sun-Times<\/em>. For instance, the editorial makes no mention whatsoever of all the <a href=\"http:\/\/www.atimes.com\/atimes\/Japan\/JC05Dh01.html\">women<\/a> and <a href=\"http:\/\/www.msnbc.msn.com\/id\/30906766\/ns\/world_news-mideast_n_africa\/t\/killings-shattered-dreams-rural-iraqi-family\/\">girls<\/a> (and <a href=\"http:\/\/antiwar.com\/news\/?articleid=2444\">men<\/a> and <a href=\"http:\/\/www.gaypasg.org\/gaypasg\/PressClippings\/2005\/Jan\/US%20soldier%20claims%20gay%20panic%20made%20him%20kill.htm\">boys<\/a>) who <em>didn&#8217;t<\/em> volunteer to join the U.S. military but who are subjected to its &#8220;bad apples&#8221; all the same. Who will pay for their abortions (or funerals)? Who cares? Bigger evils must be confronted. <a href=\"http:\/\/www.suntimes.com\/opinions\/7827757-474\/editorial-does-the-real-gop-boo-gay-soldiers.html\">Gay soldiers are being booed<\/a>!<\/p>\n<p><em>*Rest assured, gentle reader, that when it comes to abortion, you and I are on the same page. I believe wholeheartedly in whatever slogans you believe in, so there&#8217;s no need to post them in comments.<\/em><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>A mere day after the forces of light and progress ensured that no American can be deprived of his or her God-given right to kill foreigners, a new crisis of conscience emerged. A Chicago Sun-Times editorial from Sept. 21 has the details: Give military women equal abortion rights Every woman who gets health insurance though [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":15,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_seopress_robots_primary_cat":"","_seopress_titles_title":"","_seopress_titles_desc":"","_seopress_robots_index":"","_et_pb_use_builder":"","_et_pb_old_content":"","_et_gb_content_width":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[440,3,54,80,9],"tags":[],"coauthors":[],"class_list":["post-11963","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-liberals","category-news","category-troop-support","category-us-military","category-war-crimes"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"meta_box":{"disable_donate_message":"","custom_donate_message":"","subtitle":""},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/11963","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/15"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=11963"}],"version-history":[{"count":25,"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/11963\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":11992,"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/11963\/revisions\/11992"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=11963"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=11963"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=11963"},{"taxonomy":"author","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/coauthors?post=11963"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}