{"id":13754,"date":"2012-01-19T14:43:41","date_gmt":"2012-01-19T22:43:41","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/?p=13754"},"modified":"2012-01-19T14:43:41","modified_gmt":"2012-01-19T22:43:41","slug":"no-war-no-sanctions-no-intervention-no-assassinations","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/2012\/01\/19\/no-war-no-sanctions-no-intervention-no-assassinations\/","title":{"rendered":"No War, No Sanctions, No Intervention, No Assassinations"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Clear, simple, to the point. A nice, simple set of values that all kinds of people should be able to get behind.<\/p>\n<p>It&#8217;s the platform, manifesto, talking points, <i>everything<\/i> of <a href=\"http:\/\/www.facebook.com\/events\/214341975322807\/\" target=\"_blank\"><b>No War on Iran: National Day of Action<\/b><\/a>, February 4th.<\/p>\n<p>A lot of anti-war activities get bogged down in lengthy laundry lists of talking points and arguments from the &#8220;top,&#8221; before they ever reach the larger numbers of people they&#8217;re supposed to recruit or inflluence. They end up having something for everyone to <i>dis<\/i>agree with.<\/p>\n<p>This thing leaves everyone free to make their own arguments and not have to answer for someone else&#8217;s stupid ideas. No war, no sanctions, no intervention, no assassinations. Anything else you want, bring yourself.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;Radical anarchist KN@PPSTER&#8221; and &#8220;sane policy advocate KN@PPSTER&#8221; are both down with the four points, for different but not really incompatible reasons.<\/p>\n<p>From a policy standpoint, screwing with Iran is the silliest damn idea I&#8217;ve heard in a decade characterized by silly ideas.<\/p>\n<p>The US has fought and lost two full-blown wars in Asia (and smaller ones in Asia and elsewhere) over the last ten years, draining its treasury and degrading its military (in both the moral and practical senses).<\/p>\n<p>Launching a third major war, against an opponent three times as populous, with much greater regional support, and much more militarily advanced than either Iraq or Afghanistan &#8230; well, if you were looking for&nbsp; proof that the assorted War Colleges of the US armed forces have &#8220;special needs&#8221; classes, just check out the number of different crayon colors used in drafting <i>that<\/i> contingency plan.<\/p>\n<p>From an anarchist standpoint, war (and preparation for war) is one of the primary instruments which the political class of every country, and their &#8220;transnational&#8221; partners, use to savage the freedoms and empty the pocketbooks of their subjects for their own benefit. 99% of the time, that&#8217;s its <i>only<\/i> purpose. The other 1% of the time is when one particular clique of the political class is in real existential danger from another clique or cliques, and wants their subjects to bail them out.<\/p>\n<p>So, get back to me if the war you&#8217;re selling is revolutionary class struggle, productive (us) vs. political (them). Otherwise, I&#8217;m not buying. And this ain&#8217;t that.<\/p>\n<p>But that&#8217;s all just me. I&#8217;m sure you have your own reasons. On February 4th, let&#8217;s set those other reasons aside and stand together for <b>no war, no sanctions, no intervention, no assassinations<\/b>.<\/p>\n<p>[cross-posted from <a href=\"http:\/\/knappster.blogspot.com\">KN@PPSTER<\/a>]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Clear, simple, to the point. A nice, simple set of values that all kinds of people should be able to get behind. It&#8217;s the platform, manifesto, talking points, everything of No War on Iran: National Day of Action, February 4th. A lot of anti-war activities get bogged down in lengthy laundry lists of talking points [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":80,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_seopress_robots_primary_cat":"","_seopress_titles_title":"","_seopress_titles_desc":"","_seopress_robots_index":"","_et_pb_use_builder":"","_et_pb_old_content":"","_et_gb_content_width":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[5,95,17,69],"tags":[],"coauthors":[],"class_list":["post-13754","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-antiwar-movement","category-intervention","category-iran","category-sanctions"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"meta_box":{"disable_donate_message":"","custom_donate_message":"","subtitle":""},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/13754","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/80"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=13754"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/13754\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":13756,"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/13754\/revisions\/13756"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=13754"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=13754"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=13754"},{"taxonomy":"author","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/coauthors?post=13754"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}