Despite the words of friendship, the diverging perspectives of the Obama administration and the Netanyahu government on key issues in the Middle East \u2013 the Arab uprisings, the Palestinian issue and the Iranian nuclear program \u2013 are profound.<\/p>\n
The dispute on the nuclear issue is centered on red lines. Israel, like the Bush administration, considers a nuclear capability in Iran a red line. It argues that the only acceptable guarantee that Iran does not get a nuclear weapon is for Iran to have no enrichment program.<\/p>\n
The Obama administration puts the red line not at enrichment \u2013 which is permitted under international law \u2013 but at nuclear weapons. This is a clearer, more enforceable red line that also has the force of international law behind it. <\/p>\n
While expressing his sympathy and friendship with Israel, Obama did not yield his red line at AIPAC. With the backing of the US Military, he has stood firm behind weaponization rather than weapons capability as the red line. <\/p>\n
He said: \u201cI have said that when it comes to preventing Iran from obtaining a nuclear weapon<\/em><\/strong> (emphasis added), I will take no options off the table, and I mean what I say.\u201d <\/p>\n This is crucial because it is essentially a question of war and peace.<\/p>\n Critically, Obama\u2019s rejection of containment at AIPAC was in the context of containing a nuclear-armed<\/em> Iran, not a nuclear capable Iran. <\/p>\n He said: \u201cIran\u2019s leaders should know that I do not have a policy of containment; I have a policy to prevent Iran from obtaining a nuclear weapon<\/strong><\/em>.\u201d <\/p>\n Nowhere in the speech is he aligning himself, or even mentioning, the Israeli red line of \u201cnuclear capability.\u201d <\/p>\n The President\u2019s tough words regarding his readiness to use military action is all in the context of preventing a nuclear weapon in Iran, not a nuclear capability. Strikingly, the president uses the D word \u2013 diplomacy \u2013 more than the M word \u2013 military action \u2013 in his speech (even though he primarily presents it as move that enabled greater sanctions on Iran.)<\/p>\n The Israeli red line is a fast track to an unnecessary and counterproductive war. This is why the US military and Obama so adamantly opposes this red line \u2013 because it ensures both war and a nuclear-armed Iran down the road.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" Despite the words of friendship, the diverging perspectives of the Obama administration and the Netanyahu government on key issues in the Middle East \u2013 the Arab uprisings, the Palestinian issue and the Iranian nuclear program \u2013 are profound. The dispute on the nuclear issue is centered on red lines. Israel, like the Bush administration, considers […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":94,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_seopress_robots_primary_cat":"","_seopress_titles_title":"","_seopress_titles_desc":"","_seopress_robots_index":"","_et_pb_use_builder":"","_et_pb_old_content":"","_et_gb_content_width":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3],"tags":[],"coauthors":[],"class_list":["post-14336","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-news"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"meta_box":{"disable_donate_message":"","custom_donate_message":"","subtitle":""},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/14336","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/94"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=14336"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/14336\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":14337,"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/14336\/revisions\/14337"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=14336"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=14336"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=14336"},{"taxonomy":"author","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/coauthors?post=14336"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}