{"id":1528,"date":"2004-12-08T16:03:42","date_gmt":"2004-12-08T23:03:42","guid":{"rendered":""},"modified":"2004-12-08T16:03:42","modified_gmt":"2004-12-08T23:03:42","slug":"not-that-glenn-reynolds-would-try-to-mislead-anyone","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/2004\/12\/08\/not-that-glenn-reynolds-would-try-to-mislead-anyone\/","title":{"rendered":"Not That Glenn Reynolds Would Try to Mislead Anyone"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><P>Oh no. Perish the thought! <A HREF=\"http:\/\/instapundit.com\/archives\/019717.php\">He\u2019s running<\/A> with that <A HREF=\"http:\/\/www.timesonline.co.uk\/article\/0,,3-1393172,00.html\">Yushchenko poisoning &quot;confirmed&quot;<\/A> story from the <I>London Times<\/I> \u2013 many hours after it\u2019s been thoroughly debunked by the Associated Press, which <A HREF=\"http:\/\/seattlepi.nwsource.com\/national\/apeurope_story.asp?category=1103&amp;slug=Austria%20Yushchenko\">reports<\/A>:<\/P><P><i>&quot;The cause of the illness that has left Ukrainian opposition leader Viktor Yushchenko&#8217;s face pockmarked is still not known, the director of the hospital that treated him said Wednesday, rejecting a report that the presidential candidate was poisoned.<\/i><\/P><P><i>&quot;\u2026Doctors are still running tests to try to determine what caused the illness, said Dr. Michael Zimpfer, the Rudolfinerhaus director.<\/i><\/P><P><I>&quot;\u2026Zimpfer rejected as \u2018<B>entirely untrue<\/B>\u2019 a story in the Wednesday edition of the London daily <\/i>The Times<I>, which quoted Dr. Nikolai Korpan &#8211; the Rudolfinerhaus physician who oversaw Yushchenko&#8217;s treatment &#8211; as saying that Yushchenko had been poisoned and the intention was to kill the candidate.<\/i><\/P><P><i>&quot;Korpan also was quoted as denying making the remarks.&quot;<\/i><\/P><P>You mean the news media is \u2013 yikes! \u2013 biased??? The <I>Times <\/I>was \u2026 lying? Omigod, say it isn\u2019t so!<\/P><P>Glenn was even busy implicating Vladimir Putin as the culprit. Evidence? Who needs evidence? Certainly not a professor of <I>law<\/I>\u2026.<\/P><P>To those of us with built-in BS-detectors, however, it wasn\u2019t hard to anticipate this particular debunking. The Times story claims that the poisoning has been &quot;confirmed,&quot; but somehow neglects to name the mysterious substance that supposedly disfigured Yushchenko\u2019s once-handsome visage. Oh, and, even though the &quot;poisoning&quot; diagnosis is &quot;confirmed,&quot; there\u2019s just one minor complication:<\/P><P><i>&quot;We need to check him again here in Vienna. If we received him today, we could finish the whole investigation in two or three days.&quot; <\/i><\/P><P>Unfortunately, however, according to the <I>Times<\/I>\u2019s Jeremy Page &#8212; &quot;reporting&quot; from Kiev &#8212; &quot;a spokeswoman said [Yushchenko] had no plans to travel to Vienna.&quot; Gee, so I guess that means the &quot;mystery&quot; wouldn\u2019t be cleared up until \u2026 after the election. How convenient.<\/P><P>The key tip off, however, that the whole story was bogus from beginning to end is that the Cato Institute&#8217;s resident neocon and Karen Kean Lopez of <I>National Review<\/I> both believed it \u2013 and no doubt still do. Ideology trumps reality every time.<\/P> <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Oh no. Perish the thought! He\u2019s running with that Yushchenko poisoning &quot;confirmed&quot; story from the London Times \u2013 many hours after it\u2019s been thoroughly debunked by the Associated Press, which reports:&quot;The cause of the illness that has left Ukrainian opposition leader Viktor Yushchenko&#8217;s face pockmarked is still not known, the director of the hospital that [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":6,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_seopress_robots_primary_cat":"","_seopress_titles_title":"","_seopress_titles_desc":"","_seopress_robots_index":"","_et_pb_use_builder":"","_et_pb_old_content":"","_et_gb_content_width":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[],"tags":[676],"coauthors":[],"class_list":["post-1528","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","tag-antiwar-movement"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"meta_box":{"disable_donate_message":"","custom_donate_message":"","subtitle":""},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1528","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/6"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1528"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1528\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1528"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1528"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1528"},{"taxonomy":"author","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/coauthors?post=1528"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}