{"id":1639,"date":"2005-01-16T18:37:13","date_gmt":"2005-01-17T01:37:13","guid":{"rendered":""},"modified":"2005-01-16T18:37:13","modified_gmt":"2005-01-17T01:37:13","slug":"investors-business-daily-goes-over-the-edge","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/2005\/01\/16\/investors-business-daily-goes-over-the-edge\/","title":{"rendered":"<I>Investor&#8217;s Business Daily<\/I> Goes Over the Edge"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><a href=\"http:\/\/fairuse.1accesshost.com\/news3\/ibd1.html\"><I>Investor&#8217;s Business Daily<\/I> wants the US to invade Syria:<\/a><\/p>\n<blockquote><p><I>Regime change in Syria should be the ultimate goal of the civilized world.<\/I><\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>And they seem to have no illusions about it:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p><I>A move against Syria would no doubt have given critics even more reason to make the Vietnam comparison: Syria would be to Iraq what Laos and Cambodia were to Vietnam.<\/I><\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>Yes&#8230;.<\/p>\n<blockquote><p><I>But so what? Critics do little other than criticize. And in this case, they&#8217;d do nothing to make our troops safer in Iraq except bring them home, which would only make the world less safe for others.<\/I><\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>The editorial continues to explain how Syria is the most evil nation on Earth.  For the life of me, I don&#8217;t understand how they think this is good for business.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Investor&#8217;s Business Daily wants the US to invade Syria: Regime change in Syria should be the ultimate goal of the civilized world. And they seem to have no illusions about it: A move against Syria would no doubt have given critics even more reason to make the Vietnam comparison: Syria would be to Iraq what [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":8,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_seopress_robots_primary_cat":"","_seopress_titles_title":"","_seopress_titles_desc":"","_seopress_robots_index":"","_et_pb_use_builder":"","_et_pb_old_content":"","_et_gb_content_width":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[],"tags":[676],"coauthors":[],"class_list":["post-1639","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","tag-antiwar-movement"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"meta_box":{"disable_donate_message":"","custom_donate_message":"","subtitle":""},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1639","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/8"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1639"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1639\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1639"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1639"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1639"},{"taxonomy":"author","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/coauthors?post=1639"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}