{"id":16966,"date":"2012-11-04T19:53:20","date_gmt":"2012-11-05T03:53:20","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/antiwar.com\/blog\/?p=16966"},"modified":"2012-11-04T19:53:20","modified_gmt":"2012-11-05T03:53:20","slug":"consulate-security-failures-as-excuse-for-military-escalation","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/2012\/11\/04\/consulate-security-failures-as-excuse-for-military-escalation\/","title":{"rendered":"Consulate Security Failures as Excuse for Military Escalation"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Bringing the September 11 attack on the Benghazi Consulate finally full circle today, a new <a href=\"http:\/\/www.bendbulletin.com\/article\/20121104\/NEWS0107\/211040406\/\">analysis piece<\/a> is reporting that the reason the Pentagon didn&#8217;t respond to a multi-hour attack in a Libyan city is that, shockingly, the US doesn&#8217;t have a massive military force deployed in Africa ready for any and all possible adventures. <\/p>\n<p>That&#8217;s going to change, of course, and military officials say this has given &#8220;new energy&#8221; to the call for massive deployments in Africa. <\/p>\n<p>Its mostly uncritically presented, of course. It&#8217;s just a formality really: something happened and now the US is going to throw troops at it. That&#8217;s the one constant in US foreign policy. <\/p>\n<p>The practical matters are entirely ignored, of whether a US quick-action force inside Africa would really be any closer to Benghazi, a port city on the Mediterranean Sea which is a 90 minute flight from Naples, than the one that&#8217;s already in Europe. That the attack was a function of a State Department not taking security even a little seriously and ignoring repeated expressions of concern, that&#8217;s out of the conversation too. The US spends an outrageous amount of money on the military, and the idea that any given city on the planet doesn&#8217;t have a bunch of US helicopter gunships deployable in a matter of minutes is a shock to the narrative of the all-powerful US military. <\/p>\n<p>The lack of a &#8220;quick-reaction force&#8221; in Africa should be a function of the complete lack of legitimate US security interests in Africa to justify such a force. Instead its being bemoaned as a failing while officials look for more and more points of military involvement in Africa to justify yet more escalation. <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Bringing the September 11 attack on the Benghazi Consulate finally full circle today, a new analysis piece is reporting that the reason the Pentagon didn&#8217;t respond to a multi-hour attack in a Libyan city is that, shockingly, the US doesn&#8217;t have a massive military force deployed in Africa ready for any and all possible adventures. [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":32,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_seopress_robots_primary_cat":"","_seopress_titles_title":"","_seopress_titles_desc":"","_seopress_robots_index":"","_et_pb_use_builder":"","_et_pb_old_content":"","_et_gb_content_width":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3],"tags":[],"coauthors":[],"class_list":["post-16966","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-news"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"meta_box":{"disable_donate_message":"","custom_donate_message":"","subtitle":""},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/16966","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/32"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=16966"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/16966\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":16967,"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/16966\/revisions\/16967"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=16966"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=16966"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=16966"},{"taxonomy":"author","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/coauthors?post=16966"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}