{"id":17124,"date":"2012-11-12T21:09:59","date_gmt":"2012-11-13T05:09:59","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/antiwar.com\/blog\/?p=17124"},"modified":"2012-11-12T21:09:59","modified_gmt":"2012-11-13T05:09:59","slug":"the-art-of-foreign-investment","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/2012\/11\/12\/the-art-of-foreign-investment\/","title":{"rendered":"The Art of Foreign Investment"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><em>&#8220;Lets you, and me, and all your money that&#8217;s in all our banks talk.&#8221; <\/em><br \/>\n&#8211; a hypothetical French prospectus<\/p>\n<p>With its economy struggling like many others in the European Union, France is in bad need of foreign investment. And it&#8217;d like it to be in cash. And it&#8217;s already got that cash. <\/p>\n<p>In what even by diplomatic standards seems to be an incredibly cynical effort, French Foreign Minister Laurent Fabius and Industry Minister Arnaud Montebourg have headed to Libya to announce that <a href=\"http:\/\/news.yahoo.com\/france-eyes-libya-deals-unfreezing-2-billion-assets-214924044--finance.html\">they are &#8220;ready&#8221; to start releasing<\/a> some seized Libyan assets to the nation&#8217;s sovereign wealth fund, and that they think it&#8217;d be swell if that sovereign wealth fund invested those assets in French businesses. <\/p>\n<p>&#8220;France is committed through me to immediately begin unfreezing the funds of the Libyan Investment Authority estimated at $1.865 billion,&#8221; Fabius told Libya&#8217;s parliament, while Montebourg pointed out France can get them a really good deal on a refinery in Normandy. <\/p>\n<p>All told France seized $8-$9 billion in Libyan assets last year, and has only given Libya $1.8 billion so far. The addition $5 billion or so above and beyond what was given was not mentioned, likely because France didn&#8217;t have anything juicy to sell them for that part of the money yet. <\/p>\n<p>Putting aside the implied shakedown going on here, it would seem like Libya, which was pounded with airstrikes by France and other NATO members just a year ago, would have a lot of other uses for that money other than buying Norman oil refineries. With Libya&#8217;s oil-rich economy looking to rebound and the French economy <a href=\"http:\/\/www.cnbc.com\/id\/49756772\">staggering along <\/a>at an estimated 0.3 percent annual growth, it seems like the sovereign wealth fund would also find their own nation a better return on investment. <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>&#8220;Lets you, and me, and all your money that&#8217;s in all our banks talk.&#8221; &#8211; a hypothetical French prospectus With its economy struggling like many others in the European Union, France is in bad need of foreign investment. And it&#8217;d like it to be in cash. And it&#8217;s already got that cash. In what even [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":32,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_seopress_robots_primary_cat":"","_seopress_titles_title":"","_seopress_titles_desc":"","_seopress_robots_index":"","_et_pb_use_builder":"","_et_pb_old_content":"","_et_gb_content_width":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3],"tags":[],"coauthors":[],"class_list":["post-17124","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-news"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"meta_box":{"disable_donate_message":"","custom_donate_message":"","subtitle":""},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/17124","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/32"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=17124"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/17124\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":17125,"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/17124\/revisions\/17125"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=17124"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=17124"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=17124"},{"taxonomy":"author","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/coauthors?post=17124"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}