{"id":17234,"date":"2012-11-26T10:09:40","date_gmt":"2012-11-26T18:09:40","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/antiwar.com\/blog\/?p=17234"},"modified":"2012-11-26T10:10:14","modified_gmt":"2012-11-26T18:10:14","slug":"obamas-war-on-transparency","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/2012\/11\/26\/obamas-war-on-transparency\/","title":{"rendered":"Obama&#8217;s War on Transparency"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Obama&#8217;s war on transparency is forever intensifying. His <a href=\"http:\/\/www.tomdispatch.com\/archive\/175500\/peter_van_buren_fear_the_silence\">crackdown on whistleblowers<\/a> and <a href=\"http:\/\/antiwar.com\/blog\/2012\/01\/17\/why-chris-hedges-is-suing-barack-obama\/\">attacks on legitimate journalism<\/a> as national security threats are now infamous. But last week the President <a href=\"http:\/\/www.fas.org\/sgp\/obama\/nitp.pdf\">issued<\/a> a &#8220;Memorandum for the Heads of Executive Departments and Agencies&#8221; which detailed new requirements that agencies must meet in order to tackle &#8220;insider threats,&#8221; or the threat of potential leakers and whistleblowers.<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/antiwar.com\/blog\/2012\/11\/26\/obamas-war-on-transparency\/obama3-4\/\" rel=\"attachment wp-att-17236\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\" wp-image-17236 alignright\" src=\"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2012\/11\/Obama3.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"363\" height=\"305\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2012\/11\/Obama3-300x251.jpg 300w, https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2012\/11\/Obama3.jpg 518w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 363px) 100vw, 363px\" \/><\/a>The new standards, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.fas.org\/blog\/secrecy\/2012\/11\/wh_insider_threat.html\">according to Steven Aftergood<\/a> at Secrecy News, are based on an October 2011\u00a0<a href=\"http:\/\/www.fas.org\/irp\/offdocs\/eo\/eo-13587.htm\">executive order<\/a>, &#8220;and they reflect the ongoing tightening of safeguards on classified information in response to the voluminous leaks of the last few years.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>To illustrate the extent to which the Obama administration has driven the conduct of the Executive Branch underground, consider that the government <a href=\"http:\/\/news.antiwar.com\/2012\/07\/03\/cost-of-keeping-government-secret-rises-to-11-billion\/\">spent more than $11 billion dollars<\/a> in 2011 just on keeping secrets from the American public (compared with\u00a0$4.7 billion in 2001).<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/antiwar.com\/blog\/2011\/08\/02\/government-secrecy-is-worse-than-you-think\/\">Document reviews conducted by ISOO<\/a>\u00a0in 2009 discovered violations of classification rules in 65% of the documents examined, with several agencies posting error rates of more than 90%.\u00a0According to the ISOO, the government made a record 76,795,945 classification decisions in 2010, an increase of more than 40% from 2009.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cTo me it illustrates the most important problem \u2014 namely that we are classifying far too much information,\u201d Aftergood has said. \u201cThe credibility of the classification system is collapsing under the weight of bogus secrets.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>At this point, though, the Obama administration is just piling on:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>But the latest issuance also illustrates the superfluousness (or worse) of current congressional action concerning leaks.\u00a0 Executive branch agencies do not need Congress to tell them to develop \u201ca comprehensive insider threat program management plan,\u201d as would be required by the Senate version of the pending\u00a0<a href=\"http:\/\/www.fas.org\/irp\/congress\/2012_cr\/s3454.pdf\">FY2013 Intelligence Authorization Act<\/a>\u00a0(section 509).\u00a0 Such plans will go forward in any case.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>And this intelligence bill contains measures\u00a0intended to restrict contacts between reporters and government officials, in an attempt to crack down on press freedoms when they happen to conflict with what Obama wants Americans to read about.<\/p>\n<p>Sen. Ron Wyden has spoken out against the bill.\u00a0\u201cI have been on the Senate Intelligence Committee for 12 years now, and I can recall numerous specific instances where I found out about serious government wrongdoing\u2013such as the NSA\u2019s warrantless wiretapping program, or the CIA\u2019s coercive interrogation program\u2013only as a result of disclosures by the press,\u201d\u00a0<a href=\"http:\/\/www.fas.org\/irp\/congress\/2012_cr\/wyden-hold.html\">he said<\/a>. And Obama is out to change that.<\/p>\n<p>Aftergood:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>Sen. Ron Wyden has\u00a0<a href=\"http:\/\/www.fas.org\/irp\/congress\/2012_cr\/wyden-hold.html\">placed a hold<\/a>\u00a0on the pending intelligence bill, citing objections to several of\u00a0<a href=\"http:\/\/www.fas.org\/irp\/congress\/2012_cr\/ssci-leaks.pdf\">the proposed anti-leak provisions<\/a>\u00a0contained in Title V of the bill. He said the proposed steps were misguided or counterproductive.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cI am concerned that they will lead to less-informed public debate about national security issues, and also undermine the due process rights of intelligence agency employees, without actually enhancing national security,\u201d\u00a0<a href=\"http:\/\/www.fas.org\/irp\/congress\/2012_cr\/wyden-hold.html\">he said<\/a>\u00a0on November 14.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>Obama&#8217;s efforts have the feel of making these secrecy measures a permanent fixture of the US government.<\/p>\n<p><em>\u201cThe liberties of a people never were, nor ever will be, secure, when the transactions of their rulers may be concealed from them.\u201d &#8211; Patrick Henry<\/em><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Obama&#8217;s war on transparency is forever intensifying. His crackdown on whistleblowers and attacks on legitimate journalism as national security threats are now infamous. But last week the President issued a &#8220;Memorandum for the Heads of Executive Departments and Agencies&#8221; which detailed new requirements that agencies must meet in order to tackle &#8220;insider threats,&#8221; or the [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":86,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_seopress_robots_primary_cat":"","_seopress_titles_title":"","_seopress_titles_desc":"","_seopress_robots_index":"","_et_pb_use_builder":"","_et_pb_old_content":"","_et_gb_content_width":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3],"tags":[],"coauthors":[],"class_list":["post-17234","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-news"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"meta_box":{"disable_donate_message":"","custom_donate_message":"","subtitle":""},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/17234","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/86"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=17234"}],"version-history":[{"count":4,"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/17234\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":17240,"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/17234\/revisions\/17240"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=17234"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=17234"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=17234"},{"taxonomy":"author","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/coauthors?post=17234"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}