{"id":17471,"date":"2012-12-18T07:39:23","date_gmt":"2012-12-18T15:39:23","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/antiwar.com\/blog\/?p=17471"},"modified":"2012-12-18T07:39:23","modified_gmt":"2012-12-18T15:39:23","slug":"us-to-substantially-increase-military-presence-in-philippines","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/2012\/12\/18\/us-to-substantially-increase-military-presence-in-philippines\/","title":{"rendered":"US to Substantially Increase Military Presence in Philippines"},"content":{"rendered":"

The US is going to “substantially increase its military presence in the Philippines, increasing the number of troops, aircraft and ships which routinely rotate through the country,” according to The Diplomat<\/em><\/a>.<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/a>For what purpose? Well, the transparent excuse US officials gave was almost laughable: to “serve The Philippines when struggling against natural disasters.”<\/p>\n

Of course, nobody actually believes that. Long before this decision to substantially increase US military presence in the Philippines was finalized, the US had been building up the Philippines\u2019s military and security forces, offering funding and weapons\u00a0in exchange for greater American presence<\/a>\u00a0in the country. The Philippines is just one of the many countries the Obama administration has been courting to greater client state status as part of their \u2018strategic pivot\u2019 to the Asia-Pacific region, which is aimed at containing China\u2019s rising military and economic sway. Essentially,\u00a0to maintain U.S. hegemony<\/a>.<\/p>\n

Washington has been building new military bases and refurbishing old ones in the region in order to\u00a0lay the ground-work for an \u201cair-sea battle\u201d<\/a>\u00a0with China. The idea is to have enough US bases peppered throughout the region so that China would be too surrounded to safely attack.<\/p>\n

The nationalistic, Great Game geo-politicking has its own grim consequences for the US relationship with China, but very separate consequences for the Philippines. Unfortunately, it follows a very similar pattern of Washington enabling human rights abuses in exchange for using the country as geo-political leverage.<\/p>\n

In July,\u00a0Human Rights Watch is again\u00a0called on President Aquino<\/a>\u00a0of the Philippines to prosecute and put a stop to the rampant torture, extra-judicial killings, and disappearances of \u201cleftist activists, journalists, and clergy.\u201d\u00a0Just since Obama took office, taxpayers have sent\u00a0almost $700 million<\/a>\u00a0to the Filipino government, making it one of the biggest recipients of US military aid in all of Asia, at a time when\u00a0numerous embassy cables<\/a>\u00a0released by WikiLeaks acknowledge systematic extrajudicial killings, abduction, and false arrests perpetrated by the US-supported security forces. That aid is likely to increase now that this new deal has been secured.<\/p>\n

It also looks like the US is lumping in the Philippines in the war on terror. Apparently there is a small cadre of Islamic militants there, but they don’t appear to present any threat to the US.\u00a0In February,\u00a0Washington\u00a0launched a drone strike in the southern Philippines<\/a>\u00a0that reportedly killed 15 people associated with these groups. It looks very much like how the US launched drone strikes at the behest of the Saleh regime in Yemen when it was clear Saleh was using the US drone war to eliminate his own domestic political enemies.<\/p>\n

The airstrike prompted angry reactions from some in the Philippines weary of US breach of their sovereignty. One Philippine representative, Luz Ilagan,\u00a0called for an end to US military intervention<\/a>\u00a0in their national affairs.<\/p>\n

Ilagan also called for a probe into what she referred to as the \u201cextensive and intensive intrusion of the US military in Armed Forces of the Philippines (AFP)\u00a0operations.\u201d She added, \u201cIf these reports are true, then US troops are participating in and conducting operations beyond what is allowed in the Visiting Forces Agreement and directly transgressing our sovereignty. More importantly, their participation in these operations is a potential magnet for the Philippines\u2019 participation in a brewing US-instigated regional conflict.\u201d<\/p>\n

The US is once again using its military muscle to occupy a foreign country for the sake of its own hegemony, to the detriment of the Philippines and the security of the entire region.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

The US is going to “substantially increase its military presence in the Philippines, increasing the number of troops, aircraft and ships which routinely rotate through the country,” according to The Diplomat. For what purpose? Well, the transparent excuse US officials gave was almost laughable: to “serve The Philippines when struggling against natural disasters.” Of course, […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":86,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_seopress_robots_primary_cat":"","_seopress_titles_title":"","_seopress_titles_desc":"","_seopress_robots_index":"","_et_pb_use_builder":"","_et_pb_old_content":"","_et_gb_content_width":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3],"tags":[],"coauthors":[],"class_list":["post-17471","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-news"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"meta_box":{"disable_donate_message":"","custom_donate_message":"","subtitle":""},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/17471","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/86"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=17471"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/17471\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":17474,"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/17471\/revisions\/17474"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=17471"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=17471"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=17471"},{"taxonomy":"author","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/coauthors?post=17471"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}