{"id":2029,"date":"2005-04-26T00:00:15","date_gmt":"2005-04-26T07:00:15","guid":{"rendered":""},"modified":"2005-04-26T00:00:15","modified_gmt":"2005-04-26T07:00:15","slug":"snap-out-of-it","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/2005\/04\/26\/snap-out-of-it\/","title":{"rendered":"Snap out of it"},"content":{"rendered":"

Jacob Hornberger reminds us<\/a> of the true nature of our unlimited republic:<\/p>\n

“Zacarias Moussaoui\u2019s guilty plea<\/a> to terrorism charges in U.S. federal district court does not end the Pentagon\u2019s threat that hangs over the head of every federal judge who has jurisdiction over an indicted terrorist defendant. <\/p>\n

Moussaoui\u2019s punishment must still be decided, either by a jury or by the judge if both Moussaoui and the government waive a jury. The problem is that the Pentagon and the Justice Department are still claiming the power to remove Moussaoui from the jurisdiction of the federal court and transfer him to the military for punishment, including execution. Don\u2019t forget that that\u2019s in fact what they\u2019ve done to Jose Padilla and Ali al-Marri and that they are fighting for the power to do this to every other American citizen and every foreigner whom they suspect of being a terrorist.<\/p>\n

Thus, if it looks like the jury or the judge might be unwilling to impose the death penalty on Moussaoui, the military might simply take the law into its own hands and do the dirty deed itself, transferring Moussaoui to Gitmo and executing him there, independent of any federal judicial interference.<\/p>\n

That\u2019s why the Moussaoui case \u2014 or more accurately, the Pentagon\u2019s claim of power to punish Americans and others without due process of law \u2014 still presents the most ominous threat to the freedom of the American people in our lifetime.”<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

The funny part is that the feds have said before that they don’t even really believe he was meant to be the twentieth hijacker. That was Ramzi Binalshibh<\/a>. As Seymour Hersh has written<\/a>, <\/p>\n

“The assumption of government bungling was predicated on the assumption that Moussaoui was indeed the twentieth hijacker. (There were five hijackers on each of the three planes that hit their targets, but only four on the flight that went down in Pennsylvania.) Moussaoui has said in federal court that he was a member of Al Qaeda, but he has denied any involvement in the hijackings. Many present and former F.B.I. and C.I.A. officials have told me that they believe he was “a wanna-be,” as one put it, and far too volatile and unstable to handle a long-term undercover terrorist operation. Nevertheless, they said, Moussaoui may have crucial knowledge about Al Qaeda.”<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

Oh, well. Close enough for an execution<\/a>, right?
\nIf you’re not a terrorist, you don’t have anything to worry about.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Jacob Hornberger reminds us of the true nature of our unlimited republic: “Zacarias Moussaoui\u2019s guilty plea to terrorism charges in U.S. federal district court does not end the Pentagon\u2019s threat that hangs over the head of every federal judge who has jurisdiction over an indicted terrorist defendant. Moussaoui\u2019s punishment must still be decided, either by […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":39,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_seopress_robots_primary_cat":"","_seopress_titles_title":"","_seopress_titles_desc":"","_seopress_robots_index":"","_et_pb_use_builder":"","_et_pb_old_content":"","_et_gb_content_width":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[],"tags":[676],"coauthors":[],"class_list":["post-2029","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","tag-antiwar-movement"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"meta_box":{"disable_donate_message":"","custom_donate_message":"","subtitle":""},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2029","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/39"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2029"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2029\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2029"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=2029"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=2029"},{"taxonomy":"author","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/coauthors?post=2029"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}