{"id":20762,"date":"2013-07-21T19:58:06","date_gmt":"2013-07-22T03:58:06","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/antiwar.com\/blog\/?p=20762"},"modified":"2013-07-21T19:58:06","modified_gmt":"2013-07-22T03:58:06","slug":"underwear-2-the-next-generation-of-exploding-britches","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/2013\/07\/21\/underwear-2-the-next-generation-of-exploding-britches\/","title":{"rendered":"Underwear 2: The &#8216;Next-Generation&#8217; of Exploding Britches"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab&#8217;s failed underwear bombing on Christmas of 2009 has fueled the imagination of many a TSA agent. Not that the TSA really did anything to foil him, mind, the underbomber&#8217;s explosive parcel managed to start a small fire that burned his genitals pretty bad, but that was about it. <\/p>\n<p>Still, the &#8220;next-generation&#8221; of exploding britches looms large, <a href=\"http:\/\/thehill.com\/video\/in-the-news\/312407-tsa-chief-reveals-details-of-second-underwear-bomb\">officials are pretty sure<\/a>. Dubbed &#8220;our greatest threat,&#8221; a &#8220;clear and present danger,&#8221; and probably some other stuff that sounds like Tom Clancy novels, <a href=\"http:\/\/uk.reuters.com\/article\/2013\/07\/20\/uk-usa-yemen-bombmaker-idUKBRE96J01W20130720\">Underwear 2 <\/a>was spotted by a double agent.   <\/p>\n<p>The menace of Underwear 2 continues to grow in the mind of TSA chief John Pistole, and justify ever more aggressive TSA policies. <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab&#8217;s failed underwear bombing on Christmas of 2009 has fueled the imagination of many a TSA agent. Not that the TSA really did anything to foil him, mind, the underbomber&#8217;s explosive parcel managed to start a small fire that burned his genitals pretty bad, but that was about it. Still, the &#8220;next-generation&#8221; of [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":32,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_seopress_robots_primary_cat":"","_seopress_titles_title":"","_seopress_titles_desc":"","_seopress_robots_index":"","_et_pb_use_builder":"","_et_pb_old_content":"","_et_gb_content_width":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3],"tags":[],"coauthors":[],"class_list":["post-20762","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-news"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"meta_box":{"disable_donate_message":"","custom_donate_message":"","subtitle":""},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/20762","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/32"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=20762"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/20762\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":20763,"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/20762\/revisions\/20763"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=20762"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=20762"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=20762"},{"taxonomy":"author","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/coauthors?post=20762"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}