{"id":2172,"date":"2005-06-19T15:02:11","date_gmt":"2005-06-19T22:02:11","guid":{"rendered":""},"modified":"2005-06-19T15:02:11","modified_gmt":"2005-06-19T22:02:11","slug":"mccain-again","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/2005\/06\/19\/mccain-again\/","title":{"rendered":"McCain, Again"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>John McCain &#8212; possibly the worst, most persistent <a href=\"http:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/justin\/j021400.html\">warmonger<\/a> of them all &#8212; is running for President, again, and he&#8217;s on &#8220;Meet the Press&#8221; right this moment, telling the American people that they&#8217;re wrong about Iraq &#8212; we aren&#8217;t totally losing. No, the insurgency isn&#8217;t in its &#8220;last throes,&#8221; but lots of people&#8211; &#8220;foreigners,&#8221; according to McCain &#8212; don&#8217;t think so. We get more &#8220;cut and run&#8221; rhetoric: the American people don&#8217;t want to do it. But what about the <a href=\"http:\/\/www.kansascity.com\/mld\/kansascity\/news\/politics\/11903378.htm\">polls<\/a>: are people lying to pollsters? <\/p>\n<p>What about the 40 percent military recruitment shortfall? McCain&#8217;s solution: more &#8220;patriotic&#8221; propaganda. And more money, of course. <\/p>\n<p>What should Bush say to the country about Iraq? &#8220;It&#8217;s going to be a long, hard slog.&#8221; Yeah, just like this interview. &#8220;We&#8217;ve had some successes.&#8221; Hmmmm&#8230;. sounds familiar. &#8220;Stay the course.&#8221; What a novel idea! &#8220;And that means addressing issues such as Syria.&#8221; We don&#8217;t have to &#8220;respect Syria&#8217;s border.&#8221; He claims that most of the suicide bombers are not Iraqi. &#8220;We may have to do what&#8217;s necessary.&#8221; Invade Syria? Tim &#8220;Suck-up&#8221; Russertt doesn&#8217;t dare to ask.<\/p>\n<p>Compare and contrast to comments of Nebraska Republican Sen. Chuck Hagel &#8212; another Republican who is mentioned frequently as a White House aspirant &#8212; to <i>US News<\/i> magazine. <a href=\"http:\/\/www.usnews.com\/usnews\/news\/articles\/050627\/27bush.htm\">Hagel<\/a> <\/p>\n<p><i>&#8220;Is angry. He&#8217;s upset about the more than 1,700 U.S. soldiers killed and nearly 13,000 wounded in Iraq. He&#8217;s also aggravated by the continued string of sunny assessments from the Bush administration, such as Vice President Dick Cheney&#8217;s recent remark that the insurgency is in its &#8216;last throes.&#8217; &#8216;Things aren&#8217;t getting better; they&#8217;re getting worse. The White House is completely disconnected from reality,&#8217; Hagel tells U.S. News. &#8216;It&#8217;s like they&#8217;re just making it up as they go along. The reality is that we&#8217;re losing in Iraq.&#8217; <\/p>\n<p>&#8220;That&#8217;s strikingly blunt talk from a member of the president&#8217;s party, even one cast as something of a pariah in the GOP because of his early skepticism about the war. &#8216;I got beat up pretty good by my own party and the White House that I was not a loyal Republican,&#8217; he says. Today, he notes, things are changing: &#8216;More and more of my colleagues up here are concerned.'&#8221;<\/i><\/p>\n<p>McCain, the media-darling &#8220;maverick,&#8221; reiterates the White House&#8217;s talking points, while Hagel, the true maverick, speaks truth to power. <\/p>\n<p>McCain on the prospect of a run for the White House: &#8220;It&#8217;s an option.&#8221; Ignore the denials: he&#8217;s running. <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>John McCain &#8212; possibly the worst, most persistent warmonger of them all &#8212; is running for President, again, and he&#8217;s on &#8220;Meet the Press&#8221; right this moment, telling the American people that they&#8217;re wrong about Iraq &#8212; we aren&#8217;t totally losing. No, the insurgency isn&#8217;t in its &#8220;last throes,&#8221; but lots of people&#8211; &#8220;foreigners,&#8221; according [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":6,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_seopress_robots_primary_cat":"","_seopress_titles_title":"","_seopress_titles_desc":"","_seopress_robots_index":"","_et_pb_use_builder":"","_et_pb_old_content":"","_et_gb_content_width":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[],"tags":[676],"coauthors":[],"class_list":["post-2172","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","tag-antiwar-movement"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"meta_box":{"disable_donate_message":"","custom_donate_message":"","subtitle":""},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2172","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/6"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2172"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2172\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2172"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=2172"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=2172"},{"taxonomy":"author","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/coauthors?post=2172"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}