{"id":2230,"date":"2005-07-14T16:39:12","date_gmt":"2005-07-14T23:39:12","guid":{"rendered":""},"modified":"2005-07-14T16:39:12","modified_gmt":"2005-07-14T23:39:12","slug":"official-truth-in-a-nutshell","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/2005\/07\/14\/official-truth-in-a-nutshell\/","title":{"rendered":"Official Truth in a nutshell"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>I wrote <a href=\"http:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/malic\/?articleid=6646\">&#8220;Smokescreen&#8221;<\/a> in the early hours of July 13, so I could not have read, much less mentioned, an editorial that appeared later that morning in <i>Newsday<\/i>. Titled &#8220;Serbs finally look within,&#8221; the <a href=\"http:\/\/www.newsday.com\/news\/printedition\/opinion\/ny-vpser134341197jul13,0,3577046.story?coll=ny-opinion-print\">editorial<\/a> manages to pull together just about every strand of Official Truth about Srebrenica, and can thus serve as an exemplar of mainstream opinion. It is somehow fitting that such an&#8221; honor&#8221; belongs to a paper that peddled the Pulitzer-winning atrocity propaganda of Roy Gutman, early in the Bosnian War.<!--more--><\/p>\n<p>Starting out by repeating the tale of &#8220;more than 7500&#8221; Muslims massacred by Serbs in the &#8220;worst single atrocity in Europe since World War II,&#8221; <i>Newsday<\/i> calls Srebrenica &#8220;an unpardonable blot on the conscience of Serbs and the international community.&#8221; Sure, the editorial continues, the European UN peacekeepers were at fault for not helping the Muslims, but the real blame lies with the Serbian people as a whole. Oh yes, none of that &#8220;individual responsibility&#8221; claptrap any more, it&#8217;s all collective:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>&#8220;the Serbian people only recently have come to recognize, however grudgingly, their collusion in the systematic mass murder at Srebrenica, when their nationalistic anti-Muslim fervor was stoked by former President Slobodan Milosevic.&#8221;<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>Four unproven &#8211; indeed, ricidulous &#8211; claims are presented here as facts beyond dispute: that what took place in Srebrenica was &#8220;systematic,&#8221; that Serbs &#8220;colluded&#8221; in it, that there was an anti-Muslim fervor, and that Milosevic was responsible for it. <\/p>\n<p>Having made such assumptions, and proceeding to inform us that Milosevic is on trial for war crimes (surely, that proves his guilt, right?), <i>Newsday<\/i> editors then shake their heads and say that Mladic and Karadzic are still at large. And surely, the Serbian people are to blame: &#8220;For Mladic and Karadzic to continue evading justice, they need the help of Serbs.&#8221; The conclusion: Serbia should get no &#8220;privileges&#8221; such as &#8220;aid&#8221; and EU membership, until it delivers these two to the Hague Inquisition.<\/p>\n<p>Finally, <i>Newsday<\/i> makes the inevitable argument about the UN: Srebrenica &#8220;led to the involvement of the United States and NATO to halt the conflict after UN peacekeepers proved their impotence.&#8221; The UN may have learned a lesson, they aver, if it stages a NATO-like intervention in Darfur. But even so, it is time for &#8220;regional organizations&#8221; to &#8220;summon the will to act&#8221; when it comes to humanitarian interventions. The age of the UN is over; the age of the Empire is upon us.<\/p>\n<p>Had I fabricated an editorial to prove the point I was making in &#8220;Smokescreen,&#8221; I would not have done better.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>I wrote &#8220;Smokescreen&#8221; in the early hours of July 13, so I could not have read, much less mentioned, an editorial that appeared later that morning in Newsday. Titled &#8220;Serbs finally look within,&#8221; the editorial manages to pull together just about every strand of Official Truth about Srebrenica, and can thus serve as an exemplar [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":9,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_seopress_robots_primary_cat":"","_seopress_titles_title":"","_seopress_titles_desc":"","_seopress_robots_index":"","_et_pb_use_builder":"","_et_pb_old_content":"","_et_gb_content_width":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[],"tags":[676],"coauthors":[],"class_list":["post-2230","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","tag-antiwar-movement"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"meta_box":{"disable_donate_message":"","custom_donate_message":"","subtitle":""},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2230","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/9"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2230"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2230\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2230"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=2230"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=2230"},{"taxonomy":"author","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/coauthors?post=2230"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}