The verdict is in. All civilized people must hate Dennis Rodman. Politicians from John McCain to John Kerry, and pundits from Bill O\u2019Reilly to Chris Matthews are outraged that any American, let alone the eccentric Rodman, would travel to the land of the third member of the Axis of Evil. Earlier this week, Rodman, along with six fellow former NBA players, left for North Korea where they played an exhibition basketball game against a team of North Koreans. The game took place in front of North Korean dictator Kim Jong Un, as part of Kim\u2019s birthday celebration. American politicians and pundits across the board are aghast, and most Americans are not far behind them in their hysteria. The atmosphere evokes George Orwell\u2019s "Two Minutes Hate" sessions from 1984, where citizens of Oceania are forced to watch daily video shorts depicting scenes of Oceania\u2019s enemies in order to keep the Oceanic people frenzied with war fever. Similarly, any deviation from McCain\u2019s or Clinton\u2019s hardline hatred of our mortal enemy North Korea borders on treason. The nightly headlines detailing Rodman\u2019s idiocy are constant.<\/p>\n
Is Rodman\u2019s trip really that bad? I don\u2019t think so. In fact, I think it\u2019s an extremely positive step in the right direction if one is truly concerned with the freedom of North Koreans. For one thing, can anyone name a single thing that the State Department has done to normalize relations between our feuding governments? Have Hillary Clinton, John Kerry, or any other so-called diplomats spoken with their North Korean counterparts, let alone traveled there to show solidarity with North Korean citizens? Not that I know of. I don\u2019t care if the North Korean government is "unreasonable" or "insane". That\u2019s a state diplomat\u2019s sole job, to forge peaceful and harmonious relationships with other state actors, no matter how difficult they may be. <\/p>\n
How any government official could call herself a diplomat when her first instinct in statecraft is to issue harsh condemnations, threats and ignite cold wars is beyond me. Diplomats are supposed to be peacemakers, not antagonists. If I didn\u2019t know better, I\u2019d think the State Department & Co. are more interested in maintaining preselected foreign enemies than they are in peacemaking. But the State Department\u2019s propensity for feuding is part of a larger problem — government\u2019s utter inability to give repressed foreigners their freedom. Governments have only one arrow in their quiver: Force. When there is a problem, foreign or domestic, force is the government\u2019s only answer.<\/p>\n
For what tools does a state actually have in foreign policy? Sanctions. Threats of war. Actual war. Foreign aid. That\u2019s it. All involve violence, real or threatened, and in the case of foreign aid, theft and grotesque cronyism. Of course, a Secretary of State could travel to a foreign country just as Rodman has done, but what good would such a visit do? At the end of the day, a politician\u2019s visit would be nothing more than one master telling another master how to treat his subjects. North Koreans, and all other unfree persons, need less masters and more experience. The experience that comes from seeing other cultures and from learning that there is an entire world outside their own small country. No, Rodman and six old NBA players may not be the major dose of culture that\u2019s going to set the North Koreans free. But it\u2019s a start. A start at opening up North Korea to outsiders who bring with them a diversity of appearance, lifestyle and opinion, all things that are celebrated here in the United States. <\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
I\u2019m encouraged by the Rodman crew\u2019s trip, and applaud their effort. Had I not seen it happen, I probably would\u2019ve been led to believe that North Korea had a strict No Americans Allowed policy. I don\u2019t pretend to have the answer on how to free North Koreans from their government chains, but it doesn\u2019t take great imagination to envision annual American basketball games blossoming into something larger. People are creative and doors get opened where least expected. <\/p>\n
And no, I don\u2019t love seeing someone of Rodman\u2019s stature palling around with someone as nasty as Kim Jong UN and singing him happy birthday. I don\u2019t like seeing any government official bowed to, praised or celebrated, North Korean or otherwise. But think about it. If you had the prominence of Rodman and desired to take the first step in opening up a walled-off country, would you make any progress by dissing the country\u2019s iron-fisted leader, whose invitation you depend on? Not a chance. Perhaps Rodman\u2019s admiration for Kim is genuine, but his motivation shouldn\u2019t matter. His warm behavior towards Kim has allowed Rodman an opportunity that no United States government official has been able to achieve. At times, one wonders whether the United States government is merely angry with Rodman for striking a blow against its monopoly on diplomacy.<\/p>\n
Only shifts in culture and attitudes bring about freedom and progress. Governments are reactive, and more Rodman outings in North Korea means more knowledge for North Koreans, and a resulting hunger for information about the world beyond their state borders. Who knows when North Koreans\u2019 cultural curiosity will turn into a demand to freely interact with the world.<\/p>\n
Chad Nelson is a practicing attorney based out of Providence, RI. He is a devoted market anarchist and peace activist. Follow him on Twitter @cnels43.<\/i><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
The verdict is in. All civilized people must hate Dennis Rodman. Politicians from John McCain to John Kerry, and pundits from Bill O\u2019Reilly to Chris Matthews are outraged that any American, let alone the eccentric Rodman, would travel to the land of the third member of the Axis of Evil. Earlier this week, Rodman, along […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":118,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_seopress_robots_primary_cat":"","_seopress_titles_title":"","_seopress_titles_desc":"","_seopress_robots_index":"","_et_pb_use_builder":"","_et_pb_old_content":"","_et_gb_content_width":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3],"tags":[],"coauthors":[],"class_list":["post-22687","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-news"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"meta_box":{"disable_donate_message":"","custom_donate_message":"","subtitle":""},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/22687","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/118"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=22687"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/22687\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":22689,"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/22687\/revisions\/22689"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=22687"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=22687"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=22687"},{"taxonomy":"author","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/coauthors?post=22687"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}