In the early 1970s, I was chief of the CIA\u2019s Soviet Foreign Policy Branch in which Robert M. Gates worked as a young CIA analyst. While it may be true that I was too inexperienced at the time to handle all the management challenges of such a high-powered office, one of the things I did get right was my assessment of Gates in his Efficiency Report.<\/p>\n
I wrote that if his overweening ambition were not reined in, young Bobby was sure to become an even more dangerous problem. Who could have known, then, how huge a problem? As it turned out, I was not nearly as skilled as Gates at schmoozing senior managers who thus paid no heed to my warning. Gates was a master at ingratiating himself to his superiors.<\/p>\n
The supreme irony came a short decade later when we \u2013 ALL of us, managers, analysts, senior and junior alike \u2013 ended up working under Gates. Ronald Reagan\u2019s CIA Director William Casey had found in Gates just the person to do his bidding, someone who earned the title \u201cwindsock Bobby\u201d because he was clever enough to position himself in whatever direction the powerful winds were blowing.<\/p>\n
To justify the expensive military buildup of the 1980s and the proxy wars that Reagan wanted fought required judging the Soviet Union to be ascendant and marching toward world domination. In that cause, Gates was just the man to shatter the CIA\u2019s commitment to providing presidents with objective analysis. He replaced that proud legacy with whatever \u201cinformation\u201d would serve the White House\u2019s political needs.<\/p>\n
As Casey\u2019s choice to head the CIA analytical division and then serve as deputy CIA director, Gates showed himself to be super-successful at weeding out competent analysts, especially those \u2013 like Melvin A. Goodman \u2013 who knew the Soviet Union cold and recognized its new President Mikhail Gorbachev for the reformer he was.<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
Those analysts who refused to toe Gates\u2019s line \u2013 which required judging Gorbachev to be a phony and ignoring signs of the coming Soviet collapse \u2013 lost their jobs to more malleable managers who saw things the Gates way. Goodman was one senior analyst who quit in disgust.<\/p>\n
Yet, those CIA bureaucrats, who were more interested in personal promotion than promoting the truth, thrived under the Casey-Gates regime. The likes of John McLaughlin and Douglas MacEachin, whom Gates put in charge of Soviet analysis, wormed their way to the top of the agency. However, since the CIA had blinded itself to signs of the change that Gorbachev represented, the agency missed the fall of the U.S.S.R. in 1991.<\/p>\n
Despite that stunning embarrassment, Gates\u2019s acolytes suffered no career damage. After all, they were simply regurgitating the \u201cwisdom\u201d of Gates, who \u2013 after he moved over to President George H.W. Bush\u2019s National Security Council staff \u2013 had kept insisting to the very end that the Soviet Communist Party would NEVER lose power.<\/p>\n
So, it should have come as no surprise two decades later that many of those same CIA bureaucrats who had been promoted under Gates would be part of the malleable managerial m\u00e9nage that did President George W. Bush\u2019s bidding in conjuring up fraudulent intelligence to \u201cjustify\u201d the disastrous war on Iraq in 2003.<\/p>\n
Then, Gates, who says in his new memoir Duty<\/a><\/i> that he supported the invasion of Iraq, was brought back into government in 2006 as Defense Secretary to oversee the war\u2019s escalation, the much-touted \u201csurge,\u201d which led to the deaths of another 1,000 U.S. soldiers and countless more Iraqis but failed to achieve the political and economic reconciliation that Bush had set as its top goal.<\/p>\n I wrote about Gates back then \u2013 as well as when he was reappointed as Defense Secretary by President Barack Obama in 2009 \u2013 so I decided that there were more useful things for me to do than, once again, expose Gates. More useful things like exposing other mendacious miscreants<\/a>, like Director of National Intelligence James Clapper and National Security Agency Director Keith Alexander.<\/p>\n The mainstream U.S. news media was again falling short (surprise, surprise) in exposing these current operators, and Gates, after all, left the Official Washington scene in 2011. I also didn\u2019t want to risk nausea by reading Gates\u2019s latest Apologia pro Vita Sua.<\/p>\n I thought that anyone following the copious reporting on Consortiumnews.com regarding Gates would greet with appropriate skepticism his latest self-serving set of excuses. [See, for instance, \u201cRobert Gates Double-Crosses Obama<\/a>.\u201d] Plus, the un-malleable Mel Goodman, the only CIA division chief to quit rather than bend to Gates\u2019s dishonesty, had just given us an excellent piece titled \u201cBob Gates\u2019s Mean, Misguided Memoir.<\/a>\u201d<\/p>\n Veterans Deserve the Truth<\/b><\/p>\n So, my personal thinking was to give Gates a pass this time around. But then I began reflecting on my experiences over the past three months spending time with U.S. military veterans, including in Gates\u2019s new home state of Washington and in North Carolina and Florida, on speaking tours hosted largely by my fellow Veterans For Peace. Most of my hosts are survivors of the Vietnam War, the Gulf War of 1991, Iraq, and Afghanistan. Most of them still grapple with serious wounds of one kind or another.<\/p>\n Then, when I got home this past weekend from my latest speaking tour, I read Dan Zak\u2019s sympathetic-to-Gates feature story<\/a> in the Washington Post, describing how Gates wells up with tears when he thinks of the 11,000 troops (Gates\u2019s own count) killed or wounded in Iraq and Afghanistan on his watch as Defense Secretary.<\/p>\n That got me to thinking about my hosts and their families and all such survivors of unnecessary warfare. They surely deserve the truth about Gates\u2019s self-serving role in prolonging the agony, the killing, and the maiming in both Iraq and Afghanistan \u2013 the unconscionable waste of life, the trauma and the missing limbs for which Gates bears huge responsibility.<\/p>\n And it occurred to me that Gates\u2019s rapidly written memoir represents a holding action. His hurry to publish, even while the administration that he most recently served is still in office, betokens an unseemly rush to get his turgid version of events on the record, creating a decent interval before Afghanistan implodes, as Iraq is now doing (with 70 killed on Sunday alone).<\/p>\n Eventually the inescapable truth will out \u2013 at least for those who can \u201chandle the truth.\u201d Namely, that what happened during the celebrated \u201csurges\u201d in Iraq and Afghanistan amounted to little more than a sacrifice of thousands of U.S. troops on the altar of the unbridled ambition that I observed in the first Efficiency Report that I wrote on Gates.<\/p>\n The many pages of his memoir devoted to how much he loved those troops \u2013 and how he has asked to be buried among them at Arlington National Cemetery \u2013 amounted to an attempt to anticipate and deflect accusations that he, in actuality, betrayed those young men and women by sending more of them to die just to buy time for President Bush and other politicians to slip out of Washington before the ultimate defeats in Iraq and Afghanistan.<\/p>\n Americans also deserve to know how presidents from Ronald Reagan and George H.W. Bush through George W. Bush and Barack Obama cynically used Gates\u2019s skills and ambitions to give them political cover for their own dirty work, from the waste of countless billions in taxpayer dollars on excessive military spending to the justification and prosecution of misguided and feckless wars.<\/p>\n That\u2019s why I feel I must break my promise to myself that I would not devote one additional minute to exposing this Teflon-coated charlatan, Robert Gates. Why? Because nowhere has the Fawning Corporate Media been quite so fawning as in their misbegotten adulation of \u201cwise man\u201d Gates.<\/p>\n Five years ago, for example, the late \u201cdean of the Washington press corps,\u201d Washington Post columnist David Broder, hailed Gates as \u201cincapable of dissembling.\u201d It is too late to disabuse Broder of his fantasy on Gates. But it may not be too late to inform those still interested in the real Bobby Gates that it would be much closer to the truth to say that Gates was \u201cincapable of not dissembling.\u201d<\/p>\n Toward that end, I have dug out just three articles that I have authored in recent years in an attempt to put Robert M. Gates in some honest context. They are: \u201cGates and the Urge to Surge<\/a>\u201d; \u201cAfghan Lessons from the Iraq War<\/a>\u201d; and \u201cHow to Read Gates\u2019s Shift on the Wars<\/a>.\u201d<\/p>\n Ray McGovern works with Tell the Word, a publishing arm of the ecumenical Church of the Saviour in inner-city Washington. He came to Washington over 50 years ago and worked as a CIA analyst under seven Presidents, one less than Gates. Ray now serves on the Steering Group of Veteran Intelligence Professionals for Sanity (VIPS).<\/i><\/p>\n