{"id":22926,"date":"2014-02-24T07:04:39","date_gmt":"2014-02-24T15:04:39","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/antiwar.com\/blog\/?p=22926"},"modified":"2014-02-24T07:04:39","modified_gmt":"2014-02-24T15:04:39","slug":"egypts-military-resigns-awaits-inevitable-election-to-continue-us-backed-dictatorship","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/2014\/02\/24\/egypts-military-resigns-awaits-inevitable-election-to-continue-us-backed-dictatorship\/","title":{"rendered":"Egypt&#8217;s Military Resigns, Awaits Inevitable &#8216;Election&#8217; to Continue US-Backed Dictatorship"},"content":{"rendered":"<div id=\"attachment_22568\" style=\"width: 590px\" class=\"wp-caption aligncenter\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-22568\" class=\"size-full wp-image-22568\" alt=\"Secretary of Defense Chuck Hagel meets with Egyptian general Abdel Fatah Saeed Al Sisy\" src=\"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2013\/12\/hires_130424-D-BW835-350a-e1387472972979.jpg\" width=\"580\" height=\"387\" \/><p id=\"caption-attachment-22568\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">Secretary of Defense Chuck Hagel meets with Egyptian general Abdel Fatah Saeed Al Sisy<\/p><\/div>\n<p>Almost every brutal regime in the world, no matter how depraved, needs at least a veneer of popular legitimacy. Egypt&#8217;s ruling military junta, which ousted a democratically elected government back in July and has imposed harsh crackdowns ever since, is angling for just such &#8220;legitimacy&#8221; by &#8220;resigning&#8221; ahead of national elections.<\/p>\n<p>The <a href=\"http:\/\/www.latimes.com\/world\/worldnow\/la-fg-wn-egypt-government-resigns-20140224,0,1607433.story#axzz2uFSJOJ2F\"><em>Los Angeles Times<\/em><\/a>:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>In a surprise move that paves way for army Field Marshal Abdel Fattah Sisi to run in the upcoming presidential election, Egyptian Prime Minister Hazem Beblawi announced his Cabinet&#8217;s resignation on Monday.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<div>\n<blockquote><p>According to Egyptian regulations, Sisi, who is still the country&#8217;s acting defense minister, has to quit his military post before he can be nominated as a civilian candidate.<\/p>\n<p>An Egyptian official was quoted by Reuters as saying that Sisi did not want to appear to be acting alone by solely submitting his resignation.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;This was done as a step that was needed ahead of Sisi&#8217;s announcement that he will run for president,&#8221; the official told Reuters.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>After months of gutting the Muslim Brotherhood, sidelining secular parties, and harshly cracking down on anyone who speaks ill of the military regime, the junta can be confident in a win for Sisi. At the RAND Corp., Jeff Martini <a href=\"http:\/\/www.rand.org\/blog\/2014\/02\/the-egyptian-regimes-achilles-heel.html\">explains<\/a> Egypt&#8217;s &#8220;disheartening but predictable pattern.&#8221;<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>The generals consolidate power while their allies in the Interior Ministry crack down on the Muslim Brotherhood. Now, with the front pages of half of Egypt&#8217;s papers proclaiming the virtues of Abdel Fattah al-Sisi, Egypt&#8217;s new strongman in waiting, and the other half running tales of the Brotherhood&#8217;s terrorist connections, the question in Egypt is no longer what is going on \u2014 the trajectory, a return to military dictatorship, should be clear to anyone.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>&#8220;The traditional arrangement was to have a single dominant party securing the generals&#8217; interests while smaller parties bludgeoned each other in a show of political competition,&#8221; Martini adds. &#8220;But with no single party left to play that primary role and none on the horizon&#8221; the generals are left to find other ways to neuter the political system and retain their power.<\/p>\n<p>The &#8220;generals&#8217; civilian coalition [may] break down,&#8221; in which case they will &#8220;govern unilaterally.&#8221; &#8220;But without the barest window dressing of civilian rule, that will be much riskier business.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>Egypt&#8217;s chaotic post-Mubarak saga of perpetual overthrow and transition has left the United States to eagerly capitalize on whoever is ruling Egypt (always with the military &#8211; which has close ties to the U.S. military &#8211; in the background) in order to maintain the U.S. as the dominant foreign influence despite the ongoing uncertainty in who will govern into the future. That is still the case now: Egypt is set to receive another $1.6 billion in foreign aid.<\/p>\n<p>And for what? What indispensable benefits does this support for dictatorship yield? It&#8217;s true that,\u00a0as\u00a0<em>The New York Times<\/em>\u00a0<a href=\"http:\/\/antiwar.com\/blog\/2012\/03\/26\/military-aid-to-egypt-preserved-for-rent-seekers\/\">reported<\/a>\u00a0in 2012, U.S. aid to Egypt helps keep the pockets of defense corporations nice and full. In terms of the &#8220;national interest,&#8221; the two arguments are to maintain the Egypt-Israel peace treaty and to maintain America&#8217;s privilege access to the Suez Canal. But as I wrote about <a href=\"http:\/\/antiwar.com\/blog\/2014\/01\/06\/arguments-for-continued-us-meddling-in-egypt-are-bogus\/\">here<\/a>, those arguments are bogus.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Almost every brutal regime in the world, no matter how depraved, needs at least a veneer of popular legitimacy. Egypt&#8217;s ruling military junta, which ousted a democratically elected government back in July and has imposed harsh crackdowns ever since, is angling for just such &#8220;legitimacy&#8221; by &#8220;resigning&#8221; ahead of national elections. The Los Angeles Times: [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":86,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_seopress_robots_primary_cat":"","_seopress_titles_title":"","_seopress_titles_desc":"","_seopress_robots_index":"","_et_pb_use_builder":"","_et_pb_old_content":"","_et_gb_content_width":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3],"tags":[],"coauthors":[],"class_list":["post-22926","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-news"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"meta_box":{"disable_donate_message":"","custom_donate_message":"","subtitle":""},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/22926","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/86"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=22926"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/22926\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":22927,"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/22926\/revisions\/22927"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=22926"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=22926"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=22926"},{"taxonomy":"author","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/coauthors?post=22926"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}