{"id":239,"date":"2003-11-05T23:30:31","date_gmt":"2003-11-06T06:30:31","guid":{"rendered":""},"modified":"2003-11-05T23:30:31","modified_gmt":"2003-11-06T06:30:31","slug":"jihad-jack-calls-the-kettle-black","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/2003\/11\/05\/jihad-jack-calls-the-kettle-black\/","title":{"rendered":"Jihad Jack Calls the Kettle Black"},"content":{"rendered":"
<\/a>\n<\/div>\n

<\/a>Jack \u201cIslamic Revival<\/a>\u201d Wheeler\u2019s list of those belonging to \u201cThe Anti-American Right<\/a>\u201d includes Antiwar.com advisor Jon Utley, who he claims \u201c\u2026has simply gone around the bend in his hatred for everything America does in terms of foreign policy and everything the Bush administration does, foreign and domestic.\u201d <\/p>\n

One person\u2019s around-the-bend hatred for Bush is another’s consistent opposition to destructive policies, however. In August 2001, Antiwar.com posted an article<\/a> by Utley that criticized Clinton\u2019s military interventionism and had this to say about Bush:<\/p>\n

\u201c\u2026the best defense is ‘to give foreigners less offense,’ in the words of Ivan Eland at CATO. Already under President Bush we seem much less ready to go about bombing other nations as Clinton did. Except for Palestine and Iraq, no blood is being shed by American bombs.”<\/i><\/p>\n

A mere month before the Sept. 11 attacks, Utley presciently warned that the combination of military intervention overseas and lack of civil defense preparedness at home made America “immensely vulnerable to terrorists who would give up their lives for a mission.”<\/p>\n

\u201cThis missing element, not wanting Americans to think that there may be consequences to our killing foreigners, seriously affects civil defense. …<\/p>\n

“Still, the government is now spending $10 billion yearly on civil defense, most of it going to protect government personnel and installations. But very little, only some 2%, is going for civilian medical preparations. … For details on legal and medical preparedness, please see our handout, ‘Preparing for the Terrorist Threat<\/a>,’ published in Insight Magazine last January 15th. \u2026<\/p>\n

“The Pentagon and CIA are surely the most juicy targets for any terrorist, but American bases overseas are easier \u2013 and more likely \u2013 targets now. \u2026<\/p>\n

“However, as Jude Wanniski has written, no one controls mad fanatics. Very possibly any major American city could be targeted by those consumed with hate against us. A dirty bomb could contaminate much of a major city. A small tactical nuke (of which many are reportedly missing from Russian bases) would take out 4 or 5 city blocks; new breakthroughs in biology may develop truly horrendous agents of selective death. Or just plain suicide truck bombers with dynamite in a tunnel could wreak havoc upon us. In truth, we are immensely vulnerable to terrorists who would give up their lives for a mission. \u2026<\/p>\n

“WHAT YOU CAN DO…
\n\u00b7\tGo to your Congressman’s town hall meetings and ask him the embarrassing questions about our interventions overseas and ask for civil defense.
\n\u00b7\tStart a movement asking that our military send guards to protect key bridges and reservoirs and electric stations. The real threats are here, not overseas.”<\/i><\/p>\n

And check out this interesting article (with photo above), “Rogue Statesman<\/a>,” about Wheeler’s Afghan jihad buddy<\/a> Dana Rohrabacher.<\/p>\n

(To be fair to Wheeler, though, he did warn about the dangers of funding Hekmatyar<\/a>.) <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Jack \u201cIslamic Revival\u201d Wheeler\u2019s list of those belonging to \u201cThe Anti-American Right\u201d includes Antiwar.com advisor Jon Utley, who he claims \u201c\u2026has simply gone around the bend in his hatred for everything America does in terms of foreign policy and everything the Bush administration does, foreign and domestic.\u201d One person\u2019s around-the-bend hatred for Bush is another’s […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":5,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_seopress_robots_primary_cat":"","_seopress_titles_title":"","_seopress_titles_desc":"","_seopress_robots_index":"","_et_pb_use_builder":"","_et_pb_old_content":"","_et_gb_content_width":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[],"tags":[676],"coauthors":[],"class_list":["post-239","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","tag-antiwar-movement"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"meta_box":{"disable_donate_message":"","custom_donate_message":"","subtitle":""},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/239","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/5"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=239"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/239\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=239"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=239"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=239"},{"taxonomy":"author","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/coauthors?post=239"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}