{"id":24673,"date":"2014-12-29T10:08:44","date_gmt":"2014-12-29T18:08:44","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/antiwar.com\/blog\/?p=24673"},"modified":"2014-12-29T10:08:44","modified_gmt":"2014-12-29T18:08:44","slug":"mark-udall-urged-to-disclose-fulltorturereport","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/2014\/12\/29\/mark-udall-urged-to-disclose-fulltorturereport\/","title":{"rendered":"Mark Udall Urged To Disclose Full&nbsp;Torture&nbsp;Report"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><i>Sen. Mark Udall has called for the full release of the Senate Intelligence Committee\u2019s report on torture. However, as a still-sitting member of Congress, he has a constitutional protection to read most of the still-secret report on the Senate floor &#150; and a group of intelligence veterans urges him to do just that<\/i><\/p>\n<p>MEMORANDUM FOR: Senator Mark Udall<br \/> FROM: Veteran Intelligence Professionals for Sanity (VIPS)<br \/> SUBJECT: Stopping Torture<\/p>\n<p>We, the undersigned are veteran intelligence officers with a combined total of over 300 years of experience in intelligence work. We send you this open letter at what seems to be the last minute simply because we had been hoping we would not have to.<\/p>\n<p>You seem on the verge of leaving the Senate without letting your fellow Americans know all they need to know about CIA torture. In the eight weeks since you lost your Senate seat you gave off signs that, during your last days in office, you would provide us with a fuller account of this sordid chapter in our country\u2019s history, exercising your right to immunity under the \u201cSpeech or Debate\u201d clause in Article 1 of the Constitution.<\/p>\n<p>Your rhetoric against torture and in defense of the Constitution has been strong, but we now sense a white flag beneath it. We fear you intend to silently steal away, and thus deny the American people their last best chance to learn what they need to know about the record of CIA torture.<\/p>\n<p><!--more--><\/p>\n<p>We had been encouraged by your Dec. 10 speech on the Senate floor, in which you referred to the release of the Executive Summary of the Senate Intelligence Committee\u2019s Study on CIA torture the previous day and said: \u201cMy goal is to ensure the <strong>full truth<\/strong> comes out about this grim time in the history of the CIA and our nation, so that neither the CIA nor any future administration repeats the grievous mistake this important oversight work reveals.\u201d (our emphasis)<\/p>\n<p>Very quickly, though, your goal became fuzzier. When Scott Raab of <em>Esquire Magazine<\/em> asked you right after your speech, \u201cDo you think the remaining 6,000 or so pages will become public?\u201d You answered: \u201cI do. It\u2019s my fervent hope that they will be declassified. I will continue to call for the entire report to be declassified. The details are important &#8230; the entire report ought to be released.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>With all due respect, Senator, exactly who do you think is going to do that, if not you? Was your \u201cgoal to ensure the <strong>full truth<\/strong> comes out\u201d more rhetoric than reality? We are extremely disappointed at your apparent readiness to throw in the towel.<\/p>\n<p>You had told Raab on Nov. 21, \u201cWhat happened [the torture, lying, and cover-up] broke faith with the Constitution,\u201d adding, \u201cThere are some that would like this report [the Senate Intelligence Committee Study] never to see the light of day. There are some that are running out the clock.\u201d Clearly, you are on to their game. Are you going to let the clock run out, when what we actually need is a full-court press?<\/p>\n<p><strong>A Fine Floor Speech<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>You called, again, for CIA Director John Brennan to resign, while at the same time noting that President Obama has expressed full confidence in him and has \u201cdemonstrated that trust by making no effort at all to rein him in.\u201d In your words, the CIA keeps \u201cposing impediments or obstacles\u201d to full disclosure of its \u201cbarbaric program\u201d of torture. And you made light of Obama\u2019s merely stating, \u201cHopefully, we don\u2019t do it again in the future.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>\u201cThat\u2019s not good enough,\u201d you added, and of course you are right. Finally, you complain: \u201cIf there\u2019s no real leadership from the White House helping the public understand that the CIA\u2019s torture program wasn\u2019t necessary and didn\u2019t save lives or disrupt terrorist plots, then what\u2019s to stop the next White House and CIA director from supporting torture? &#8230;<\/p>\n<p>\u201cThe CIA has lied to its overseers and the public, destroyed and tried to hold back evidence, spied on the Senate, made false charges against our staff, and lied about torture and the results of torture. And no one has been held to account. &#8230; There are right now people serving at high-level positions at the agency who approved, directed, or committed acts related to the CIA\u2019s detention and interrogation program.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>QED \u2013 as you have demonstrated \u2013 there is no \u201creal leadership\u201d in the White House on this transcendentally important issue.<\/p>\n<p>Thus, it struck us as disingenuous to finish, as you do, with a glaring non sequitur. You call on our timid President to \u201cpurge his administration\u201d of a CIA director in whom he says he has \u201cfull confidence,\u201d together with the torture alumni and alumnae still tenaciously protected by the same director.<\/p>\n<p>Again, with all due respect, it seems equally disingenuous to appeal to this President to declassify and release the earlier review ordered by former CIA Director Leon Panetta, the conclusions of which directly refute several of Brennan\u2019s claims \u2013 much less release the full 6,800-page study of which we are permitted only a heavily redacted \u201cexecutive summary.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>You even include Panetta\u2019s own observation that President Obama and Brennan both were unhappy with Panetta\u2019s initial agreement with the committee to allow staff access to operational cables and other sensitive documents about the torture program.<\/p>\n<p>So where is the real leadership going to come from? Clearly, not from the White House. Russian President Putin is going to give Crimea to NATO before Obama does any of the things you suggested. And you know it.<\/p>\n<p>So where could the initiative come from in these final days before the Senate changes hands? Frankly, Senator Udall, we had been counting on you rising to the challenge before this unique opportunity is lost, probably forever.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Where We Are Coming From<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>We are, frankly, at a loss to explain your hesitancy \u2013 your lack of follow-through toward your stated goal \u201cto ensure the full truth comes out &#8230; so that neither the CIA nor any future administration repeats the grievous mistake [of torture].\u201d<\/p>\n<p>If you summon the courage to discharge what you no doubt realize is your duty, there is no way you will end up in jail. Indeed, this is precisely the kind of situation the Founders had in mind when they wrote the \u201cSpeech or Debate\u201d clause into Article 1 of the Constitution.<\/p>\n<p>Whatever it is that you fear, you might keep in mind that several of us \u2013 who lack the immunity you enjoy \u2013 have paid and continue to pay a heavy price for exposing lies, injustice, and abuses like torture. One of us \u2013 the first to reveal that those grisly kinds of torture (aka \u201cenhanced interrogation techniques\u201d) were approved at the highest level of government \u2013 is in prison serving a 30-month sentence. A number of us have seen the inside of prisons for doing the right thing; and all of us know what it feels like to be shunned by former colleagues.<\/p>\n<p>Also important, despite our many years of service as senior intelligence officers and our solid record for accuracy, we are effectively banned from the so-called \u201cmainstream media,\u201d which continues to prefer the role of security-state accomplice in disparaging, for example, the findings of the Senate Intelligence Committee Study. (Never mind that the study is based on indisputably original CIA cables and other documents.) In contrast, you are not banned from the media \u2013 yet. You have a few more days; you need to use them.<\/p>\n<p>In your \u201cAdditional Views\u201d on the Senate committee Study released on Dec. 9, you applaud Sen. Dianne Feinstein \u201cfor seeing this project to completion.\u201d But wait. You are surely aware (1) that the project remains far from complete; and (2) that if you or one of your Senate colleagues do not move tout suite to release the full Study together with the earlier review commissioned by Panetta, the \u201cproject\u201d will not be brought to \u201ccompletion\u201d any time soon \u2013 unless a courageous whistleblower runs great risk and does what you can do with impunity.<\/p>\n<p>Moreover, releasing the report, as you have the authority to do under the Constitution, would publicly demonstrate that at least one legal method of whistleblowing does exist. So when such truly illegal actions occur, even at the most senior levels, there is a way of righting wrongs.<\/p>\n<p>You are correct to call the committee Study \u201cone of the most significant examples of oversight in the history of the U.S. Senate.\u201d We imagine that the strong support you and Sen. Ron Wyden gave Sen. Feinstein helped make it so. And we join you both in applauding Sen. Feinstein\u2019s tenacity in getting the Study\u2019s 500-page executive summary released. John Brennan used every conceivable ruse to slow-roll and eviscerate the summary, but Sen. Feinstein faced him down. She achieved all she could, given the circumstances. But the project remains far from \u201ccompletion.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>In your \u201cAdditional Views\u201d you note that, as a new member of the intelligence committee four years ago, you were \u201cdeeply disturbed to learn specifics about the flaws in the [torture] program, the misrepresentations, the brutality.\u201d You add that you wrote the President letters about this in May, June, and July of this year. Surely the lack of response told you something. Please \u2013 not another letter to Obama. You need to go beyond letters.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Your Turn<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Now it\u2019s your turn, Senator Udall. Put Constitution and conscience into play, together with the immunity you enjoy. You can \u2013 and, in our view, your oath to the Constitution dictates that you must \u2013 rise to the occasion and find a way to release the entire 6,800-page Study, including CIA\u2019s comments (but not redacted to a fare-thee-well). You need to put this at the very top of your job jar \u2013 now, before it is too late.<\/p>\n<p>The American people are owed the truth. As you have noted more than once, they are not likely to get it from Brennan \u2013 or the President for that matter. Nor will it come from the mainstream media with their customary \u201con-the-one-hand-and-then-on-the-other\u201d approach to journalism. Polling data on the widespread acceptance of using torture \u201cto keep us safe\u201d is a direct result of that kind of coverage \u2013 as well as of the artful crafting of words and phrases in the questions asked in those surveys.<\/p>\n<p>The comments of the many of the TV talking-torture heads seem almost designed to discourage viewers from reading the damning executive summary itself. Who wants to read such abhorrent stuff at Christmastime, anyway?<\/p>\n<p>If those who approved and conducted torture are not held accountable, torture is a virtual certainty for the future. In that sense, you are quite right in saying that the Committee staff has done \u201cseminal\u201d work. The seeds have been sown for reining in an executive agency acting lawlessly; or, alternatively, for endorsing, out of fear, the practice of torture in the future.<\/p>\n<p>John Brennan, those who were in the CIA chain of command for torture, and the co-opted lawyers and faux-psychologists who lent their needed skills to the enterprise may be a bit nervous over the next few days until you are safely gone. But there is little sign they actually expect you to rise to the challenge.<\/p>\n<p>Indeed, Brennan and Co. seem intent on advertising their power and impunity by recently leaking the latest demonstration of lack of accountability. Surprise, surprise: the panel appointed by Brennan to investigate Brennan and his people for hacking into Senate Intelligence Committee computers has reportedly decided to hold no one accountable, including Brennan himself, who initially lied about it. Now we learn that he apparently authorized the hacking in the first place, so everyone involved receives a stay-out-of-jail-free card. Smug impunity needs to be challenged using your immunity.<\/p>\n<p>Finally, Senator Udall, history books will record the release of the highly redacted summary of the five-year-in-the-making Senate report on torture. It will also record whether or not the Senate rose \u2013 even if only in the form of a single, un-intimidated man, to expose truly and in fullness what was done in the name of the American people. Our history is replete with such individual acts of courage by Americans who put country before self. Will you join them?<\/p>\n<p><strong>For the Steering Group, Veteran Intelligence Professionals for Sanity (VIPs)<\/strong><\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>\n<div class=\"entry-content\">William Binney, former Technical Director, World Geopolitical &amp; Military Analysis, NSA; co-founder, SIGINT Automation Research Center (ret.)<\/div>\n<\/li>\n<li>\n<div class=\"entry-content\">Thomas Drake, Defense Intelligence Senior Executive Service, NSA (resigned)<\/div>\n<\/li>\n<li>\n<div class=\"entry-content\">Daniel Ellsberg, former State Dept. &amp; Defense Dept. Official (VIPS Associate)<\/div>\n<\/li>\n<li>\n<div class=\"entry-content\">Mike Gravel, former Senator from Alaska; former Army intelligence officer<\/div>\n<\/li>\n<li>\n<div class=\"entry-content\">Larry Johnson, CIA analyst &amp; State Department\/counterterrorism, (ret.)<\/div>\n<\/li>\n<li>\n<div class=\"entry-content\">John Kiriakou, former CIA counterterrorism operations officer; federal prison, Loretto, Pennsylvania<\/div>\n<\/li>\n<li>\n<div class=\"entry-content\">Edward Loomis, former Chief, SIGINT Automation Research Center, NSA<\/div>\n<\/li>\n<li>\n<div class=\"entry-content\">David MacMichael, USMC &amp; National Intelligence Council (ret.)<\/div>\n<\/li>\n<li>\n<div class=\"entry-content\">Ray McGovern, Army Infantry\/Intelligence officer &amp; CIA presidential briefer (ret.)<\/div>\n<\/li>\n<li>\n<div class=\"entry-content\">Elizabeth Murray, Deputy National Intelligence Officer for Middle East (ret.)<\/div>\n<\/li>\n<li>\n<div class=\"entry-content\">Todd Pierce, MAJ, U.S. Army Judge Advocate (ret.)<\/div>\n<\/li>\n<li>\n<div class=\"entry-content\">Coleen Rowley, Minneapolis Division Counsel &amp; Special Agent, FBI (ret.)<\/div>\n<\/li>\n<li>\n<div class=\"entry-content\">Peter Van Buren, Department of State, Foreign Service Officer (ret.)<\/div>\n<\/li>\n<li>\n<div class=\"entry-content\">Kirk Wiebe, Senior Analyst, SIGINT Automation Research Center, NSA (ret.)<\/div>\n<\/li>\n<li>\n<div class=\"entry-content\">Ann Wright, Col., US Army (ret); Foreign Service Officer (ret.)<\/div>\n<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p><i>Reprinted from <a href=\"http:\/\/consortiumnews.com\/\">Consortium News<\/a> with permission.<\/i><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Sen. Mark Udall has called for the full release of the Senate Intelligence Committee\u2019s report on torture. However, as a still-sitting member of Congress, he has a constitutional protection to read most of the still-secret report on the Senate floor &#150; and a group of intelligence veterans urges him to do just that MEMORANDUM FOR: [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":153,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_seopress_robots_primary_cat":"","_seopress_titles_title":"","_seopress_titles_desc":"","_seopress_robots_index":"","_et_pb_use_builder":"","_et_pb_old_content":"","_et_gb_content_width":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3],"tags":[],"coauthors":[],"class_list":["post-24673","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-news"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"meta_box":{"disable_donate_message":"","custom_donate_message":"","subtitle":""},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/24673","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/153"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=24673"}],"version-history":[{"count":3,"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/24673\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":24675,"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/24673\/revisions\/24675"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=24673"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=24673"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=24673"},{"taxonomy":"author","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/coauthors?post=24673"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}