{"id":2469,"date":"2005-10-26T18:13:59","date_gmt":"2005-10-27T01:13:59","guid":{"rendered":""},"modified":"2005-10-26T18:13:59","modified_gmt":"2005-10-27T01:13:59","slug":"la-repubblica-uk-niger-intelligence","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/2005\/10\/26\/la-repubblica-uk-niger-intelligence\/","title":{"rendered":"<I>La Repubblica<\/I> &#8211; UK Niger &#8220;intelligence&#8221;"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Henry Farrell at Crooked Timber has translated part of today&#8217;s <A HREF=\"http:\/\/crookedtimber.org\/2005\/10\/26\/more-from-la-repubblica\/\"><i>La Repubblica<\/i> piece<\/A>:<BLOCKQUOTE><I>La Repubblica<\/I> has another story today on the role of Italian intelligence in feeding bogus evidence on Niger to Hadley and others in the US and elsewhere. There\u2019s one key piece of new information. UK intelligence claimed to have evidence independent of the forged documents, which showed that Iraq had indeed been trying to obtain uranium in Niger. According to <i>La Repubblica<\/i>:    <BLOCKQUOTE>This \u201cevidence\u201d has never been brought forward \u2026 \u201cIf it ever were brought forward,\u201d said a source in Forte Braschi to la Repubblica, with a smile, \u201cit would be discovered, with red faces, that it was Italian intelligence collected by SISMI at the end of the 1980\u2019s, and shared with our friend Hamilton McMillan.\u201d<\/BLOCKQUOTE><\/BLOCKQUOTE><A HREF=\"http:\/\/crookedtimber.org\/2005\/10\/26\/more-from-la-repubblica\/\">More analysis by Henry here.<\/A><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Henry Farrell at Crooked Timber has translated part of today&#8217;s La Repubblica piece:La Repubblica has another story today on the role of Italian intelligence in feeding bogus evidence on Niger to Hadley and others in the US and elsewhere. There\u2019s one key piece of new information. UK intelligence claimed to have evidence independent of the [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":26,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_seopress_robots_primary_cat":"","_seopress_titles_title":"","_seopress_titles_desc":"","_seopress_robots_index":"","_et_pb_use_builder":"","_et_pb_old_content":"","_et_gb_content_width":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[],"tags":[676],"coauthors":[],"class_list":["post-2469","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","tag-antiwar-movement"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"meta_box":{"disable_donate_message":"","custom_donate_message":"","subtitle":""},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2469","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/26"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2469"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2469\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2469"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=2469"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=2469"},{"taxonomy":"author","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/coauthors?post=2469"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}