{"id":2499,"date":"2005-11-08T06:36:35","date_gmt":"2005-11-08T13:36:35","guid":{"rendered":""},"modified":"2005-11-08T06:36:35","modified_gmt":"2005-11-08T13:36:35","slug":"ledeen-smears-himself","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/2005\/11\/08\/ledeen-smears-himself\/","title":{"rendered":"Ledeen Smears Himself"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Michael Ledeen is <a href=\"http:\/\/www.aei.org\/publications\/pubID.23424,filter.all\/pub_detail.asp\">whining<\/a> about reports that supposedly accuse him of forging the fake Niger documents. There&#8217;s just one problem, though: no one that I have read on the subject is making any such accusation. The <a href=\"http:\/\/www.warandpiece.com\/blogdirs\/002925.html\"><i>La Repubblica<\/i> series<\/a> by Carlo Bonini and Giuseppe d&#8217;Avanzo says that Ledeen was the conduit for the forgeries, &#8220;stovepiping&#8221; them &#8212; or their content &#8212; from Rome to Washington via the Office of Special Plans &#8212; the Pentagon&#8217;s parallel intelligence-gathering operation that did an end-run around the CIA. <\/p>\n<p>As for my own <a href=\"http:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/justin\/?articleid=7681\">contribution<\/a> to the story, it explicitly states Ledeen was a &#8220;conduit&#8221; for the report, and that the forging was done by others. <\/p>\n<p>Ledeen, the master of obfuscation, is confusing the issue: but then that&#8217;s not too surprising. He&#8217;s eager to deny his own reported role in this shameful affair, but it seems distinctly odd that he&#8217;s doing so by overstating it &#8212; basically accusing himself of crimes no one has fingered him for. He ought to give himself a break &#8212; and give us one, too. No one is fooled by this strenuous smoke-blowing. But I can&#8217;t help thinking that where there&#8217;s so much smoke, there has to be a certain amount of fire &#8230;<\/p>\n<p>UPDATE: Several readers have pointed to this bit of &#8220;dialogue&#8221; between Ledeen and &#8220;James Jesus Angleton,&#8221; whose shade Ledeen communes with (via ouija board) to set us mortals straight, to correct my contention that Ledeen is &#8220;whining&#8221; about being tagged as a forger:<\/p>\n<p><i>&#8220;JJA: The ones that say you forged them? I didn&#8217;t know your French was<br \/>\ngood enough&#8230;<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;ML: No, no, not those. Anyway hardly anybody said that, mostly they<br \/>\naccused me of schlepping them, not forging them.&#8221;<\/i><\/p>\n<p>If we remember that Angleton is, after all, quite dead, and that Ledeen&#8217;s by-now-tiresome literary device is just that &#8212; a device &#8212; we are confronted with the curious conundrum of Ledeen smearing himself out of one side of his mouth, and correcting himself out of the other. <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Michael Ledeen is whining about reports that supposedly accuse him of forging the fake Niger documents. There&#8217;s just one problem, though: no one that I have read on the subject is making any such accusation. The La Repubblica series by Carlo Bonini and Giuseppe d&#8217;Avanzo says that Ledeen was the conduit for the forgeries, &#8220;stovepiping&#8221; [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":6,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_seopress_robots_primary_cat":"","_seopress_titles_title":"","_seopress_titles_desc":"","_seopress_robots_index":"","_et_pb_use_builder":"","_et_pb_old_content":"","_et_gb_content_width":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[],"tags":[676],"coauthors":[],"class_list":["post-2499","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","tag-antiwar-movement"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"meta_box":{"disable_donate_message":"","custom_donate_message":"","subtitle":""},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2499","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/6"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2499"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2499\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2499"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=2499"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=2499"},{"taxonomy":"author","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/coauthors?post=2499"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}