{"id":2522,"date":"2005-11-18T18:24:42","date_gmt":"2005-11-19T01:24:42","guid":{"rendered":""},"modified":"2005-11-18T18:24:42","modified_gmt":"2005-11-19T01:24:42","slug":"fitzgerald-convenes-new-grand-jury","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/2005\/11\/18\/fitzgerald-convenes-new-grand-jury\/","title":{"rendered":"Fitzgerald Convenes New Grand Jury"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>It looks like <a href=\"http:\/\/news.yahoo.com\/s\/nm\/20051118\/pl_nm\/bush_leak_dc_19\">Patrick J. Fitzgerald<\/a> isn&#8217;t quite done:<\/p>\n<p><i>&#8220;Special prosecutor Patrick Fitzgerald said in court filings that the ongoing CIA leak investigation will involve proceedings before a new grand jury, a possible sign he could seek new charges in the case.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;In filings obtained by Reuters on Friday, Fitzgerald said &#8220;the investigation is continuing&#8221; and that &#8220;the investigation will involve proceedings before a different grand jury than the grand jury which returned the indictment&#8221; against Vice President Dick Cheney&#8217;s chief of staff, Lewis &#8220;Scooter&#8221; Libby.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;Fitzgerald did not elaborate in the document. For two years he has been investigating the leak of covert CIA operative Valerie Plame&#8217;s identity. The grand jury that indicted Libby expired after the charges were filed late last month.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;President George W. Bush&#8217;s top political adviser, Karl Rove, was not indicted along with Libby. But lawyers involved in the case said Rove remained under investigation and may still be charged.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;Earlier this week Washington Post journalist Bob Woodward disclosed that he testified under oath to Fitzgerald that a senior Bush administration official had casually told him in mid-June 2003 about CIA operative Valerie Plame&#8217;s position at the agency.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;Fitzgerald&#8217;s comments about bringing proceedings before a different grand jury were contained in court filings in which he backed off seeking a blanket order to keep all documents in the CIA leak case secret.&#8221;<\/i><\/p>\n<p>This ought to dispel the notion &#8212; pushed by the <a href=\"http:\/\/antiwar.com\/justin\/?articleid=7908\">Scooter Libby Fan Club<\/a> &#8212; that the Fitzgerald investigation is much ado about nothing. Here is a special prosecutor determined to get to the bottom of Treason-gate &#8212; and more power to him!<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>It looks like Patrick J. Fitzgerald isn&#8217;t quite done: &#8220;Special prosecutor Patrick Fitzgerald said in court filings that the ongoing CIA leak investigation will involve proceedings before a new grand jury, a possible sign he could seek new charges in the case. &#8220;In filings obtained by Reuters on Friday, Fitzgerald said &#8220;the investigation is continuing&#8221; [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":6,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_seopress_robots_primary_cat":"","_seopress_titles_title":"","_seopress_titles_desc":"","_seopress_robots_index":"","_et_pb_use_builder":"","_et_pb_old_content":"","_et_gb_content_width":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[],"tags":[676],"coauthors":[],"class_list":["post-2522","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","tag-antiwar-movement"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"meta_box":{"disable_donate_message":"","custom_donate_message":"","subtitle":""},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2522","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/6"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2522"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2522\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2522"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=2522"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=2522"},{"taxonomy":"author","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/coauthors?post=2522"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}