{"id":25537,"date":"2015-08-05T09:44:50","date_gmt":"2015-08-05T17:44:50","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/antiwar.com\/blog\/?p=25537"},"modified":"2015-08-06T05:40:44","modified_gmt":"2015-08-06T13:40:44","slug":"70th-anniversary-of-the-a-bombing-of-hiroshima-and-nagasaki","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/2015\/08\/05\/70th-anniversary-of-the-a-bombing-of-hiroshima-and-nagasaki\/","title":{"rendered":"70th Anniversary of the A-bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>This week marks the 70th anniversary of the U.S. atomic bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki, President Harry Truman&#8217;s acts of mass murder against the Japanese in August 1945. Some <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Atomic_bombings_of_Hiroshima_and_Nagasaki\">90,000-166,000<\/a> individuals were killed in Hiroshima on Aug. 6. The Nagasaki bombing on Aug. 9 killed 39,000-80,000 human beings. (It has come to my attention that the U.S. military bombed <a href=\"http:\/\/fff.org\/explore-freedom\/article\/bombings-worse-nagasaki-hiroshima\/\"><b>Tokyo<\/b><\/a>on Aug. 14 &#150; after destroying Hiroshima and Nagasaki and after Emperor Hirohito expressed his readiness to surrender.)<\/p>\n<p>There isn&#8217;t much to be said about those unspeakable atrocities against civilians that hasn&#8217;t been said many times before. The U.S. government never needed atomic bombs to commit mass murder, but it dropped them anyway. (Remember this when judging the <a href=\"http:\/\/sheldonfreeassociation.blogspot.com\/2015\/07\/two-cheers-for-iran-agreement.html\">official U.S. moralistic stance toward Iran<\/a>.) Its &#8220;conventional&#8221; weapons have been potent enough. (See the earlier <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Tokyo_firebombing\">firebombing of Tokyo<\/a>.) Nor did it need the bombs to persuade Japan to surrender; the Japanese government had been suing for peace. The U.S. government may not have used atomic weapons since 1945, but it has not yet given up mass murder as a political\/military tactic. Presidents and presidential candidates are still expected to say that, with respect to nuclear weapons, &#8220;no options are off the table.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>Mario Rizzo has pointed out that Americans were upset by the murder of 3,000 people on 9\/11 yet seem not to be bothered that &#8220;their&#8221; government murdered hundreds of thousands of Japanese civilians in two days. Conservatives, ironically, were among the <a href=\"http:\/\/www.independent.org\/newsroom\/article.asp?id=5056\">earliest critics<\/a> of Truman&#8217;s mass murder. It&#8217;s also worth noting that the top military leaders of the day opposed the use of atomic bombs. <\/p>\n<p> As Harry Truman once said, &#8220;I don&#8217;t give &#8217;em hell. I just drop A-bombs on their cities and they think it&#8217;s hell.&#8221; (Okay, he didn&#8217;t really say that, but he might as well have.) <\/p>\n<p> Some people still see the A-bombs as <a href=\"http:\/\/www.miamiherald.com\/opinion\/opn-columns-blogs\/glenn-garvin\/article29893303.html\">the only alternative to invasion<\/a>, which would have cost many more civilian lives. Now there&#8217;s the fallacy of the false alternative in dying color. Why couldn&#8217;t the U.S. military have called it a day and gone home? Why the assumption that the state must destroy and conquer its &#8220;enemy&#8221;? Why demand unconditional surrender? (To back up a step, why go to war against Japan at all? Pearl Harbor was the result of systematic, intentional provocation &#150; as Herbert Hoover and others pointed out at the time) &#150; perhaps with complete Roosevelt&#8217;s foreknowledge. A government less concerned with a rival to its and its allies&#8217; colonial possessions might have not gotten involved.)<\/p>\n<p> Rad Geek People&#8217;s Daily has a poignant post <a href=\"http:\/\/radgeek.com\/gt\/2007\/08\/06\/815_am\/\"><b>here<\/b><\/a>. Rad says: &#8220;As far as I am aware, the atomic bombing of the Hiroshima city center, which deliberately targeted a civilian center and killed over half of the people living in the city, remains the deadliest act of terrorism in the history of the world.&#8221; <\/p>\n<p> Other things to read: Anthony Gregory&#8217;s &#8220;<a href=\"http:\/\/www.lewrockwell.com\/2011\/08\/anthony-gregory\/hiroshima-nagasaki-and-the-us-terror-state\/\" style=\"font-family: 'Times New Roman', serif; font-size: 12pt;\" title=\"Hiroshima, Nagasaki, and the US Terror State\">Hiroshima, Nagasaki, and the US Terror State,&#8221;<\/a><b style=\"font-family: 'Times New Roman', serif; font-size: 12pt;\"><\/b>David Henderson&#8217;s <a href=\"http:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/henderson\/?articleid=11405\" style=\"font-family: 'Times New Roman', serif; font-size: 12pt;\">&#8220;Remembering Hiroshima,&#8221;<\/a> and G.E.M. Anscombe&#8217;s <a href=\"http:\/\/www.anthonyflood.com\/anscombetrumansdegree.htm\">&#8220;Mr. Truman&#8217;s Decree.&#8221;<\/a><\/p>\n<p> Finally, if you read nothing else on this subject, read Ralph Raico&#8217;s article <a href=\"https:\/\/mises.org\/library\/harry-truman-and-atomic-bomb\">here<\/a>. <\/p>\n<p><i>Sheldon Richman is a Research Fellow at <a href=\"http:\/\/independent.org\/\">The Independent Institute<\/a>, which is based in Oakland, California. This originally appeared on his blog, <a href=\"http:\/\/sheldonfreeassociation.blogspot.com\/\">Free Association<\/a>.<\/i><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>This week marks the 70th anniversary of the U.S. atomic bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki, President Harry Truman&#8217;s acts of mass murder against the Japanese in August 1945. Some 90,000-166,000 individuals were killed in Hiroshima on Aug. 6. The Nagasaki bombing on Aug. 9 killed 39,000-80,000 human beings. (It has come to my attention that [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":177,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_seopress_robots_primary_cat":"","_seopress_titles_title":"","_seopress_titles_desc":"","_seopress_robots_index":"","_et_pb_use_builder":"","_et_pb_old_content":"","_et_gb_content_width":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3],"tags":[],"coauthors":[],"class_list":["post-25537","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-news"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"meta_box":{"disable_donate_message":"","custom_donate_message":"","subtitle":""},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/25537","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/177"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=25537"}],"version-history":[{"count":4,"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/25537\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":25548,"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/25537\/revisions\/25548"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=25537"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=25537"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=25537"},{"taxonomy":"author","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/coauthors?post=25537"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}