{"id":27899,"date":"2016-10-23T06:45:49","date_gmt":"2016-10-23T14:45:49","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/?p=27899"},"modified":"2016-10-23T06:45:49","modified_gmt":"2016-10-23T14:45:49","slug":"why-is-petraeus-an-expert-on-mosul","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/2016\/10\/23\/why-is-petraeus-an-expert-on-mosul\/","title":{"rendered":"Why Is Petraeus an Expert on Mosul?"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>General (retired) <a href=\"https:\/\/bracingviews.com\/2013\/09\/18\/americas-ascetic-warrior-generals\/\">David Petraeus<\/a> was on PBS the other day to explain the current Iraqi offensive on Mosul. Sure, his military \u201csurges\u201d in Iraq and Afghanistan had no staying power, and he disgraced himself by <a href=\"https:\/\/bracingviews.com\/2015\/03\/04\/petraeus-and-snowden-both-leakers-of-classified-material-same-punishment\/\">sharing classified information<\/a> with his mistress during an extramarital affair, but nevertheless let\u2019s call on him as an unbiased \u201c<a href=\"https:\/\/bracingviews.com\/2016\/07\/05\/petraeus-the-messiah\/\">expert<\/a>\u201d on all things military. Right?<\/p>\n<p>Anyway, I thought the following <a href=\"http:\/\/www.pbs.org\/newshour\/bb\/petraeus-says-theres-bigger-challenge-come-iraq-retakes-mosul-isis\/\">words of Petraeus<\/a> were revealing:<\/p>\n<p><em>But that\u2019s the extent of what we [the U.S.] can do [in Iraq today]. We can encourage, we can nudge, we can cajole [the Iraqi military and Kurdish forces]. We can\u2019t force. And it is going to have to be Iraqis at the end of the day that come together, recognizing that, if they cannot, fertile fields will be planted for the planting of the seeds of ISIS 3.0, of further extremism in Iraq.<\/em><\/p>\n<p>Wow. There&#8217;s no sense here that the US is to blame for planting the seeds of Iraqi extremism (or, at the very least, fertilizing them) in those \u201cfertile fields.\u201d Overthrowing Saddam Hussein in 2003 and demobilizing Iraqi military forces predictably left a power vacuum that facilitated factionalism and extremism in Iraq, which was only exacerbated by an extended and mismanaged US occupation. Petraeus\u2019s \u201cSurge\u201d in 2007 papered over some of the worst cracks, but only temporarily, a fact that Petraeus himself knew (consider all his caveats about \u201cgains\u201d being \u201cfragile\u201d and \u201creversible\u201d).<\/p>\n<p><!--more--><\/p>\n<p>But no matter. Petraeus is now saying it\u2019s up to the Iraqis to get their act together, with some \u201cnudging\u201d and \u201ccajoling\u201d by the US I\u2019m sure Iraqi leaders are happy to learn that US experts like Petraeus are behind them, ready to encourage and nudge and cajole. They\u2019re likely happiest with US Apache helicopters and direct tactical assistance via Special Ops teams (yes, there are US boots on the ground, and they\u2019re in harm\u2019s way).<\/p>\n<p>And Petraeus\u2019s reference to ISIS 3.0: Isn\u2019t it strange to compare a terrorist organization\u2019s evolution to a new software product roll-out? Petraeus might have added that ISIS 1.0 came as a result of the extended US occupation of Iraq, and that ISIS 2.0 came as US forces pulled out, leaving behind Iraqi security forces that the US claimed were ready to defend Iraq, but which <a href=\"http:\/\/www.tomdispatch.com\/post\/175907\/tomgram%3A_william_astore%2C_america%27s_hollow_foreign_legions\/\">fled in 2014<\/a>, abandoning their weapons and equipment to ISIS forces. Put plainly, US bungling helped to launch ISIS 1.0 and to equip ISIS 2.0. And yet Petraeus suggests if there\u2019s an ISIS 3.0, that version will be entirely the fault of the Iraqis.<\/p>\n<p>Throughout the Petraeus interview, there\u2019s a callous calculus in place. For example, earlier in the interview, Petraeus casually notes the population of Mosul, originally 2 million people, is down to 1.2 million and dropping. Nothing is said about the missing 800,000 Iraqis. Most are refugees, but many are dead. Doesn&#8217;t their fate suggest a colossal failure of the war and occupation you ran, General Petraeus? But questions such as this are never asked in the mainstream media.<\/p>\n<p>In its long wars in the Greater Middle East, the US has an incredibly short and corrupted memory. Indeed, to stay with Petraeus and his software analogies, the American memory is a circular file that is constantly overwritten with flawed data. That\u2019s a recipe not for smooth running but for catastrophic crashes. And so it has proved.<\/p>\n<p><i>William J. Astore is a retired lieutenant colonel (USAF). He taught history for fifteen years at military and civilian schools and blogs at <a href=\"https:\/\/bracingviews.com\/\">Bracing Views<\/a>. He can be reached at <a href=\"mailto:wastore@pct.edu\">wastore@pct.edu<\/a>. Reprinted from <a href=\"https:\/\/bracingviews.com\/\">Bracing Views<\/a> with the author&#8217;s permission.<\/i><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>General (retired) David Petraeus was on PBS the other day to explain the current Iraqi offensive on Mosul. Sure, his military \u201csurges\u201d in Iraq and Afghanistan had no staying power, and he disgraced himself by sharing classified information with his mistress during an extramarital affair, but nevertheless let\u2019s call on him as an unbiased \u201cexpert\u201d [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":290,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_seopress_robots_primary_cat":"","_seopress_titles_title":"","_seopress_titles_desc":"","_seopress_robots_index":"","_et_pb_use_builder":"","_et_pb_old_content":"","_et_gb_content_width":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3],"tags":[],"coauthors":[],"class_list":["post-27899","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-news"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"meta_box":{"disable_donate_message":"","custom_donate_message":"","subtitle":""},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/27899","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/290"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=27899"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/27899\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":27901,"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/27899\/revisions\/27901"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=27899"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=27899"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=27899"},{"taxonomy":"author","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/coauthors?post=27899"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}