{"id":28289,"date":"2017-02-01T13:37:30","date_gmt":"2017-02-01T21:37:30","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/?p=28289"},"modified":"2017-02-01T13:37:30","modified_gmt":"2017-02-01T21:37:30","slug":"war-drums-trumps-national-security-advisor-threatens-iran","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/2017\/02\/01\/war-drums-trumps-national-security-advisor-threatens-iran\/","title":{"rendered":"War Drums: Trump&#8217;s National Security Advisor Threatens Iran"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>It wasn&#8217;t hard to see this coming. President Trump&#8217;s National Security Advisor, Gen. Michael Flynn, delivered a <a href=\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/ABCPolitics\/status\/826866888252678147\">clear threat<\/a> to the government of Iran today, ominously stating that &#8220;as of this day, we are officially putting Iran on notice.&#8221; What is less clear is the <span>the General&#8217;s <\/span>rationale for issuing the threat.<\/p>\n<p>Flynn cites two justifications for bringing the US on war footing against Iran. Both are dubious. First, he blames Iran for a recent attack on a Saudi naval vessel carried out by Houthi forces in Yemen. According to Flynn, because the Houthis are backed by Iran &#8211; itself a <a href=\"https:\/\/www.washingtonpost.com\/news\/monkey-cage\/wp\/2016\/05\/16\/contrary-to-popular-belief-houthis-arent-iranian-proxies\/?utm_term=.c5f67afefb11\">specious claim<\/a> &#8211; it is Iran that is actually responsible for the attack.<\/p>\n<p>Even if it were true that the Houthis are Iranian proxies, this kind of guilt-by-association reasoning gets quite awkward when considering what some US-backed rebels in Syria have done with US-provided weapons and training. Like <a href=\"http:\/\/www.dailymail.co.uk\/news\/article-3697770\/US-backed-Nour-al-Din-al-Zenki-behead-boy-accused-al-Quds-spy-Assad.html\">beheading young boys<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p><!--more--><\/p>\n<p>What Flynn fails to mention is that Saudi Arabia has been attacking neighboring Yemen since 2015, with US assistance, leaving tens of thousands killed and injured and the Middle East&#8217;s poorest country in the midst of devastating famine. Saudi Arabia&#8217;s war on Yemen was unprovoked, initiated only to force Riyadh&#8217;s preferred leader onto its southern neighbor. Under Flynn&#8217;s logic, it is perfectly fine for Saudi Arabia to initiate a <a href=\"http:\/\/www.independent.co.uk\/news\/world\/middle-east\/yemen-air-strike-bomb-kills-140-saudi-arabia-usa-white-house-a7352386.html\">genocidal<\/a> war of aggression against another country. But the victim of the attack had better not fight back or the United States will blame yet a third country that has nothing to do with it.<\/p>\n<p>And these are the experts?<\/p>\n<p>The second reason for putting Iran at the top of Flynn&#8217;s hit list: Over the weekend Iran tested a medium-range ballistic missile which Flynn claims violates the P5+1 negotiated and UN-backed Iran nuclear deal. UN Security Council Resolution 2231 &#8220;calls on&#8221; Iran to not undertake any activity related to ballistic missiles capable of delivering nuclear weapons, but this section has been interpreted as a request rather than a prohibition. There are no specific provisions in the nuclear deal that explicitly prevent Iran from testing a missile.<\/p>\n<p>In fact, Iran has tested several ballistic missiles since the nuclear agreement was signed but this time the US reaction is far different. Iran has been &#8220;emboldened,&#8221; said General Flynn, by an Obama Administration that was &#8220;weak and ineffective&#8221; in its dealings with Iran. He went on to lament that Iran has not been &#8220;thankful to the United States for these agreements.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>Flynn&#8217;s subordinates have long complained of his aggressive style, including a <a href=\"https:\/\/www.nytimes.com\/2016\/12\/03\/us\/politics\/in-national-security-adviser-michael-flynn-experience-meets-a-prickly-past.html\">demand<\/a> after the 2012 Benghazi attack on a CIA facility that analysts find some link to Iran. This pressure to &#8220;stove-pipe&#8221; intelligence to suit a predetermined policy is eerily reminiscent of the methods used to push the 2003 Iraq war. He was <a href=\"http:\/\/nypost.com\/2016\/07\/09\/the-military-fired-me-for-calling-our-enemies-radical-jihadis\/\">fired from his previous job<\/a> as Defense Intelligence Agency chief for, reportedly, his extremely hostile views toward Iran.<\/p>\n<p>Adding together President Trump&#8217;s call to the Saudi king, where they discussed Iran&#8217;s &#8220;destabilizing&#8221; actions, and a preemptive war authorization bill languishing in the US House, the current danger of a US strike on Iran is just an accident &#8211; or a false flag &#8211; away. <\/p>\n<p><i>Daniel McAdams is director of the <a href=\"http:\/\/www.ronpaulinstitute.org\/\">The Ron Paul Institute for Peace &amp; Prosperity<\/a>. Reprinted from The Ron Paul Institute for Peace &amp; Prosperity.<\/i><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>It wasn&#8217;t hard to see this coming. President Trump&#8217;s National Security Advisor, Gen. Michael Flynn, delivered a clear threat to the government of Iran today, ominously stating that &#8220;as of this day, we are officially putting Iran on notice.&#8221; What is less clear is the the General&#8217;s rationale for issuing the threat. Flynn cites two [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":241,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_seopress_robots_primary_cat":"","_seopress_titles_title":"","_seopress_titles_desc":"","_seopress_robots_index":"","_et_pb_use_builder":"","_et_pb_old_content":"","_et_gb_content_width":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3],"tags":[],"coauthors":[],"class_list":["post-28289","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-news"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"meta_box":{"disable_donate_message":"","custom_donate_message":"","subtitle":""},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/28289","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/241"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=28289"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/28289\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":28291,"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/28289\/revisions\/28291"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=28289"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=28289"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=28289"},{"taxonomy":"author","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/coauthors?post=28289"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}