{"id":2840,"date":"2006-07-07T20:54:55","date_gmt":"2006-07-08T03:54:55","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/2006\/07\/07\/ben-wattenberg-is-dead-wrong-as-usual\/"},"modified":"2006-07-07T21:40:33","modified_gmt":"2006-07-08T04:40:33","slug":"ben-wattenberg-is-dead-wrong-as-usual","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/2006\/07\/07\/ben-wattenberg-is-dead-wrong-as-usual\/","title":{"rendered":"Ben Wattenberg is Dead Wrong &#8212; As Usual"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>I&#8217;ve been watching Ben Wattenberg&#8217;s PBS program, &#8220;<a href=\"http:\/\/www.pbs.org\/thinktank\/\">Thinktank<\/a>,&#8221; for quite a while now. That&#8217;s not because the party-lining neocon is especially interesting, nor is it due to his guest line-up, which is usually so wonkish &#8212; or <a href=\"http:\/\/www.pbs.org\/thinktank\/transcript1234.html\">so neoconnish<\/a> &#8212; that the effect is either soporific or irritating. No, the reason I catch at least the tail end of it is because it comes on right before &#8220;The McLaughlin Group,&#8221; which I don&#8217;t want to miss a nano-second of. Over the years, however, I&#8217;ve grown rather fond of ol&#8217; Ben Wattenberg, with his old-style Scoop Jackson Social Democratic-style warmongering and his genuine bafflement that anyone could dispute the neoconservative party line. I&#8217;ve found myself yelling at the tv: &#8220;Hey, Ben, c&#8217;mon &#8212; you don&#8217;t really believe that, do you?&#8221; Never did I ever expect he would one day yell back.<\/p>\n<p>He did it on his &#8220;<a href=\"http:\/\/wattenblog.blogspot.com\/2006\/07\/justin-raimondo-is-dead-wrong.html\">Wattenblog<\/a>&#8220;:<\/p>\n<p><em>&#8220;<a href=\"http:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/justin\/?articleid=9249\">Justin Raimondo<\/a> is dead wrong\u00c2\u00a0<\/em><\/p>\n<p><em>&#8220;Lyndon Johnson used to say he was a free man, an American, a Texan and a Democrat \u00e2\u20ac\u201d in that order. I believe Joe Lieberman has the same hierarchy of values, with the state changed.<\/em><em>&#8220;Fifty or a hundred years from now the USA will be known in larger measure because we promoted and purveyed the values of liberty, democracy and human rights. Justin: You have a problem with that? The jihadist islamo-fascists want to destroy America through fear \u00e2\u20ac\u201d fear of plagues (small pox, anthrax etc.) and through massive conversion to a religion some of whose adherents condone terrorism. Wake up and smell the coffee!<\/p>\n<p><\/em><\/p>\n<p class=\"post-footer\"><font face=\"Trebuchet MS\" color=\"#999999\" size=\"2\">posted by Ben Wattenberg at <\/font><a title=\"permanent link\" href=\"http:\/\/wattenblog.blogspot.com\/2006\/07\/justin-raimondo-is-dead-wrong.html\"><font face=\"Trebuchet MS\" color=\"#996699\" size=\"2\">8:46 AM<\/font><\/a>&#8220;<\/p>\n<p class=\"post-footer\">Yes, as a matter of fact, I <em>do<\/em> have a problem with that &#8212; because, to begin with, in the next fifty to one-hundred years, the U.S. will be remembered for going bankrupt with astonishing rapidity, not, as Wattenberg insists, for spreading &#8220;liberty,&#8221; &#8220;democracy&#8221; and &#8220;human rights.&#8221; Those values will have been largely lost where it counts &#8212; on the home front &#8211;precisely because we launched a crusade to export them at gunpoint. In Iraq, the American implant will have long ago withered on the vine.<\/p>\n<p class=\"post-footer\">As for fear of anthrax and other plagues, I would suggest Ben consult the FBI on the former: they all but accused and indicted a &#8220;<a href=\"http:\/\/www.washingtonpost.com\/ac2\/wp-dyn\/A49717-2003Sep9?language=printer\">person of interest<\/a>&#8220;\u00c2\u00a0in the case, and then dropped the ball,\u00c2\u00a0ruining a person&#8217;s life and bungling the investigation in the process. On the general subject of fear, and its political uses, I would further suggest he take it up with <a href=\"http:\/\/politicalhumor.about.com\/library\/images\/blfearfactor.htm\">George W. Bush<\/a> and <a href=\"http:\/\/www.americanprogressaction.org\/site\/apps\/nl\/content2.asp?c=klLWJcP7H&#038;b=699965&#038;ct=1760371\">Dick Cheney<\/a>, both of whom, in concert with <a href=\"http:\/\/www.brainyquote.com\/quotes\/quotes\/c\/condoleezz164877.html\">other<\/a> administration officials, conjured visions of mushroom clouds blossoming over American cities if we didn&#8217;t go to war in Iraq.<\/p>\n<p class=\"post-footer\">Does Wattenberg really believe Osama bin Laden aims at converting the majority of Americans to his version of Sunni Islam? And how, exactly, does he intend to accomplish this &#8212; by repealing history, abolishing the Judeo-Christian tradition, and launching a cultural revolution in America? Good luck with that one &#8230;.<\/p>\n<p class=\"post-footer\">Piling the absurd atop the improbable, Wattenberg invokes LBJ in his defense of Senator Lieberman &#8212; not a very auspicious invocation. The old <a href=\"http:\/\/www.religion-online.org\/showarticle.asp?title=782\">fraudster<\/a> was effectively <a href=\"http:\/\/www.lbjlib.utexas.edu\/johnson\/archives.hom\/speeches.hom\/680331.asp\">forced from office<\/a> on account of his prosecuting &#8212; and escalating &#8212; an enormously unpopular war, just as Lieberman is endangered by a similar upsurge in antiwar sentiment over Iraq. If Wattenberg insists on invoking the spirit of LBJ in defending Lieberman, then perhaps we can take this as a premonition of the Connecticut Senator&#8217;s political fate.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>I&#8217;ve been watching Ben Wattenberg&#8217;s PBS program, &#8220;Thinktank,&#8221; for quite a while now. That&#8217;s not because the party-lining neocon is especially interesting, nor is it due to his guest line-up, which is usually so wonkish &#8212; or so neoconnish &#8212; that the effect is either soporific or irritating. No, the reason I catch at least [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":6,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_seopress_robots_primary_cat":"","_seopress_titles_title":"","_seopress_titles_desc":"","_seopress_robots_index":"","_et_pb_use_builder":"","_et_pb_old_content":"","_et_gb_content_width":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[],"tags":[676],"coauthors":[],"class_list":["post-2840","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","tag-antiwar-movement"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"meta_box":{"disable_donate_message":"","custom_donate_message":"","subtitle":""},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2840","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/6"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2840"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2840\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2840"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=2840"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=2840"},{"taxonomy":"author","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/coauthors?post=2840"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}