{"id":28840,"date":"2017-04-14T09:58:54","date_gmt":"2017-04-14T17:58:54","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/?p=28840"},"modified":"2017-04-14T09:58:54","modified_gmt":"2017-04-14T17:58:54","slug":"what-have-we-done-executive-power-drones-and-trump","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/2017\/04\/14\/what-have-we-done-executive-power-drones-and-trump\/","title":{"rendered":"What Have We Done: Executive Power, Drones, and Trump"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>The news is rife with President Trump\u2019s threatened and actual military misadventures: in Syria, Yemen, and North Korea. But these military actions take on a new gravity considering the vast and secret powers Trump inherited.<\/p>\n<p>Former President Obama <a href=\"https:\/\/theintercept.com\/drone-papers\/the-assassination-complex\/\" data-saferedirecturl=\"https:\/\/www.google.com\/url?hl=en&amp;q=https:\/\/theintercept.com\/drone-papers\/the-assassination-complex\/&amp;source=gmail&amp;ust=1492178716070000&amp;usg=AFQjCNE1iJP2MCI65vCizyiOtIBL16DneQ\">escalated the use of drone strikes<\/a> \u2013 including in non-battlefield arenas such as Libya, Pakistan, Somalia, and Yemen \u2013 so it is no surprise that President Trump has continued with abandon. While Obama put some constraints on drones, Trump gave the secretive, unaccountable CIA <a href=\"https:\/\/www.wsj.com\/articles\/trump-gave-cia-power-to-launch-drone-strikes-1489444374\" data-saferedirecturl=\"https:\/\/www.google.com\/url?hl=en&amp;q=https:\/\/www.wsj.com\/articles\/trump-gave-cia-power-to-launch-drone-strikes-1489444374&amp;source=gmail&amp;ust=1492178716070000&amp;usg=AFQjCNGdvIBaescGcPhhyf_kS4gnWaqnaQ\">new authority<\/a> to conduct drone strikes against \u201csuspected militants.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Specifically, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.wilsoncenter.org\/event\/the-efficacy-and-ethics-us-counterterrorism-strategy\" data-saferedirecturl=\"https:\/\/www.google.com\/url?hl=en&amp;q=https:\/\/www.wilsoncenter.org\/event\/the-efficacy-and-ethics-us-counterterrorism-strategy&amp;source=gmail&amp;ust=1492178716070000&amp;usg=AFQjCNEsehxlT5rWnC1yMX-Jl4gU8UH7sQ\">President Obama\u2019s constraints<\/a> on drones included that targets pose an \u201cimminent threat,\u201d that their capture is \u201cnot feasible,\u201d and that there be \u201cnear certainty\u201d civilians will not be injured or killed. However, Obama didn\u2019t always hew closely to his own policy, which evolved throughout his Presidency as legitimate criticism of drone strikes increased. One of the most famous Americans targeted and killed by a drone, <a href=\"https:\/\/ccrjustice.org\/home\/get-involved\/tools-resources\/fact-sheets-and-faqs\/al-aulaqi-v-obama-government-kill-lists\" data-saferedirecturl=\"https:\/\/www.google.com\/url?hl=en&amp;q=https:\/\/ccrjustice.org\/home\/get-involved\/tools-resources\/fact-sheets-and-faqs\/al-aulaqi-v-obama-government-kill-lists&amp;source=gmail&amp;ust=1492178716070000&amp;usg=AFQjCNGHzD3277gQH4-eprp4hAAFkQLJmQ\">al Qaeda propagandist Anwar al-Awlaki<\/a>, met none of the early purported criteria. Still, the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.nytimes.com\/2014\/06\/24\/us\/justice-department-found-it-lawful-to-target-anwar-al-awlaki.html\" data-saferedirecturl=\"https:\/\/www.google.com\/url?hl=en&amp;q=https:\/\/www.nytimes.com\/2014\/06\/24\/us\/justice-department-found-it-lawful-to-target-anwar-al-awlaki.html&amp;source=gmail&amp;ust=1492178716070000&amp;usg=AFQjCNE2YUarj4f_kmYjyRbEZ3u70cTKsg\">Justice Department under Obama maintained<\/a> that the President had the unilateral authority to target and kill American citizens like al-Awlaki. That power now rests with President Trump who has undertaken aggressive and messy military actions in the early days of his presidency.<\/p>\n<p><!--more--><\/p>\n<p>Trump has pushed for a <a href=\"https:\/\/www.nytimes.com\/2017\/02\/27\/us\/politics\/trump-budget-military.html\" data-saferedirecturl=\"https:\/\/www.google.com\/url?hl=en&amp;q=https:\/\/www.nytimes.com\/2017\/02\/27\/us\/politics\/trump-budget-military.html&amp;source=gmail&amp;ust=1492178716070000&amp;usg=AFQjCNHAtlaJ43xLqqaYkZTiHxuY5rFnDA\">$54 billion increase<\/a> in defense spending. Americans can expect Trump will use their money for expensive military actions like the <a href=\"https:\/\/theintercept.com\/2017\/03\/09\/women-and-children-in-yemeni-village-recall-horror-of-trumps-highly-successful-seal-raid\/\" data-saferedirecturl=\"https:\/\/www.google.com\/url?hl=en&amp;q=https:\/\/theintercept.com\/2017\/03\/09\/women-and-children-in-yemeni-village-recall-horror-of-trumps-highly-successful-seal-raid\/&amp;source=gmail&amp;ust=1492178716070000&amp;usg=AFQjCNHxB26Onoz11a6gGlH8XD7d0dzKeg\">botched raid in Yemen<\/a> that killed innocent women and children and an American soldier and resulted in destruction of a $75 million military helicopter. Or, for decisions that upend years of international relations policy, such as launching <a href=\"https:\/\/www.nytimes.com\/2017\/04\/07\/us\/politics\/trump-syria-airstrikes.html?action=click&amp;contentCollection=Middle%20East&amp;module=RelatedCoverage&amp;region=EndOfArticle&amp;pgtype=article\" data-saferedirecturl=\"https:\/\/www.google.com\/url?hl=en&amp;q=https:\/\/www.nytimes.com\/2017\/04\/07\/us\/politics\/trump-syria-airstrikes.html?action%3Dclick%26contentCollection%3DMiddle%2520East%26module%3DRelatedCoverage%26region%3DEndOfArticle%26pgtype%3Darticle&amp;source=gmail&amp;ust=1492178716070000&amp;usg=AFQjCNGPH0yWi86nxXDzYWVbkPYJs39VBw\">59 Tomahawk cruise missiles at Syria<\/a>. (Replacing them will <a href=\"https:\/\/www.msn.com\/en-us\/money\/companies\/this-is-how-much-it-will-cost-to-replace-the-tomahawks-used-in-syria\/ar-BBzxyXr\" data-saferedirecturl=\"https:\/\/www.google.com\/url?hl=en&amp;q=https:\/\/www.msn.com\/en-us\/money\/companies\/this-is-how-much-it-will-cost-to-replace-the-tomahawks-used-in-syria\/ar-BBzxyXr&amp;source=gmail&amp;ust=1492178716070000&amp;usg=AFQjCNEehKqpWT6qzBIFu8-CBaNX-1z-DA\">probably cost<\/a> at least $1 million per missile).<\/p>\n<p>This does not bode well for the millions of people living under the daily buzz of U.S. military drones. The power to target and kill using drone strikes went too unchecked in the Obama administration because we \u201ctrusted\u201d him. Although small pockets of national security, civil liberties, and peace groups complained about the Trust Doctrine, which seemed to apply to the most controversial conduct in which our country was engaged \u2013 from torture to surveillance to drone operations&#8211;people in positions of power were generally unwilling or unable to imagine what this power would look like in the hands of someone unpredictable, petty, and vengeful. The Obama administration exalted the drone program\u2019s <a href=\"https:\/\/www.wilsoncenter.org\/event\/the-efficacy-and-ethics-us-counterterrorism-strategy\" data-saferedirecturl=\"https:\/\/www.google.com\/url?hl=en&amp;q=https:\/\/www.wilsoncenter.org\/event\/the-efficacy-and-ethics-us-counterterrorism-strategy&amp;source=gmail&amp;ust=1492178716070000&amp;usg=AFQjCNEsehxlT5rWnC1yMX-Jl4gU8UH7sQ\">\u201csurgical precision,\u201d<\/a> the internal checks and balances built in, and the careful calculations before taking strikes. Because many saw Obama as a reasonable, intelligent President and capable leader who won the Nobel Peace Prize, Americans too calmly and too quietly accepted the secret killing practices being waged halfway around the world from US Air Force bases in our backyards in Nevada and California.<\/p>\n<p>The drone program is plagued by secrecy and unaccountability. That was true even before Trump put strike authority with the CIA and possibly relaxed civilian kill standards. Several whistleblowers have <a href=\"https:\/\/www.theguardian.com\/world\/2015\/nov\/18\/obama-drone-war-isis-recruitment-tool-air-force-whistleblowers\" data-saferedirecturl=\"https:\/\/www.google.com\/url?hl=en&amp;q=https:\/\/www.theguardian.com\/world\/2015\/nov\/18\/obama-drone-war-isis-recruitment-tool-air-force-whistleblowers&amp;source=gmail&amp;ust=1492178716070000&amp;usg=AFQjCNGFjry5IakVXrKNd0dMByw-4siJlA\">come forward<\/a> to point out abusive practices and high turnover within the program, misleading government statements on the accuracy of strikes and targeting capabilities, and an overall pressure to launch strikes while falsely presenting the propagandist narrative that drone warfare allows precision targeting with no harmful effects at home in the US. This false narrative persists because politicians want us to believe it \u2013 and so do we.<\/p>\n<p>We opened Pandora\u2019s box and unleashed drones upon humankind. But in this case, the damage was entirely foreseeable.<\/p>\n<p><em>Jesselyn Radack is a national security and human rights attorney who heads the \u201cWhistleblower &amp; Source Protection\u201d project at <a href=\"https:\/\/exposefacts.org\/\">ExposeFacts<\/a>. Twitter: <a href=\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/JesselynRadack\">@jesselynradack<\/a>. Reprinted with permission from <a href=\"https:\/\/exposefacts.org\/\">ExposeFacts<\/a>.<\/em><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>The news is rife with President Trump\u2019s threatened and actual military misadventures: in Syria, Yemen, and North Korea. But these military actions take on a new gravity considering the vast and secret powers Trump inherited. Former President Obama escalated the use of drone strikes \u2013 including in non-battlefield arenas such as Libya, Pakistan, Somalia, and [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":303,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_seopress_robots_primary_cat":"","_seopress_titles_title":"","_seopress_titles_desc":"","_seopress_robots_index":"","_et_pb_use_builder":"","_et_pb_old_content":"","_et_gb_content_width":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3],"tags":[],"coauthors":[],"class_list":["post-28840","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-news"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"meta_box":{"disable_donate_message":"","custom_donate_message":"","subtitle":""},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/28840","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/303"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=28840"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/28840\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":28842,"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/28840\/revisions\/28842"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=28840"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=28840"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=28840"},{"taxonomy":"author","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/coauthors?post=28840"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}