{"id":29466,"date":"2017-08-02T06:58:48","date_gmt":"2017-08-02T14:58:48","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/?p=29466"},"modified":"2017-08-02T06:58:48","modified_gmt":"2017-08-02T14:58:48","slug":"rep-john-duncan-conservative-peace-proponent-will-not-seek-reelection-to-us-house","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/2017\/08\/02\/rep-john-duncan-conservative-peace-proponent-will-not-seek-reelection-to-us-house\/","title":{"rendered":"Rep. John Duncan, Conservative Peace Proponent, Will Not Seek Reelection to US&nbsp;House"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/duncan.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"442\" height=\"382\" class=\"alignnone size-full wp-image-29471\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/duncan-300x259.jpg 300w, https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/duncan.jpg 442w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 442px) 100vw, 442px\" \/><\/p>\n<p> Rep. John J. Duncan, Jr. (R-TN) announced on Monday that he will not seek reelection in 2018 to the United States House of Representatives. In addition to being one of the longest-serving Republican members of the House (representing the second district of Tennessee since 1988), Duncan, who argues that being antiwar is a conservative position, is also one of the House\u2019s strongest proponents for peace.<\/p>\n<p>In his April of 2015 editorial \u201c<a href=\"http:\/\/www.ronpaulinstitute.org\/archives\/featured-articles\/2015\/april\/28\/a-return-to-the-peace-party\/\">A Return to The Peace Party<\/a>,\u201d Duncan lamented the Republican Party drifting toward being a war-supporting party and argued that it should revert to its past position as the peace party. \u201cWhen I was a teenager,\u201d Duncan wrote, \u201cI remember reading a publication from the Republican National Committee that said, \u2018Democrats start wars, Republicans end them.\u2019\u201d Duncan wrote in the editorial that he not only thought the party\u2019s shift toward hawkishness is wrong but also declared, \u201cI think it is a recipe for defeat if my Republican party becomes known as a party favoring permanent, forever wars &#8211; war without end.\u201d<\/p>\n<p><!--more--><\/p>\n<p>Duncan elaborated on his editorial\u2019s analysis in an in-depth C-SPAN <a href=\"http:\/\/www.ronpaulinstitute.org\/archives\/peace-and-prosperity\/2015\/may\/19\/rep-john-duncan-gop-as-war-party-is-a-recipe-for-defeat\/\">interview<\/a> the next month.<\/p>\n<p>Duncan has also spoken up in the House against war, including in a June of 2015 <a href=\"http:\/\/www.ronpaulinstitute.org\/archives\/congress-alert\/2015\/june\/28\/rep-john-duncan-permanent-forever-endless-war-in-the-middle-east-is-not-conservative\/\">speech<\/a> in which Duncan proclaimed, \u201cthere has been nothing conservative about our policy of permanent, forever, endless war in the Middle East,\u201d and in March of 2014 when he advised in a <a href=\"http:\/\/www.ronpaulinstitute.org\/archives\/congress-alert\/2014\/april\/07\/rep-john-duncan-s-plea-for-us-non-intervention-in-ukraine\/\">speech<\/a> in opposition to US intervention in Ukraine that, \u201cWe don&#8217;t need to be sending billions to Ukraine, and we especially should not escalate this situation into some type of military confrontation.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Duncan has cast votes in opposition to US wars and sanctions, including when he was <a href=\"http:\/\/clerk.house.gov\/evs\/2002\/roll455.xml\">one of only six House Republicans<\/a> to vote in October of 2002 against authorizing the US commencing a war against Iraq and <a href=\"http:\/\/www.ronpaulinstitute.org\/archives\/congress-alert\/2017\/july\/27\/breaking-senate-passes-russia-iran-north-korea-sanctions-bill-98-2\/\">one of only three House members<\/a> to vote last week against legislation imposing and expanding sanctions against Iran, North Korea, and Russia.<\/p>\n<p>Duncan voted against the Iraq War despite the strong support in his district for starting the war. &#8220;When I pushed that button to vote no on that war,&#8221; Duncan is quoted in a Knoxville News Sentinel <a href=\"http:\/\/archive.knoxnews.com\/news\/local\/congressman-duncan-risked-career-voting-against-the-iraq-war-ep-358584570-356036121.html\/\">article<\/a> regarding his vote, &#8220;I thought I might be ending my political career. I&#8217;m not trying to over-dramatize it. I really thought I might be.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>That vote did not end Duncan\u2019s political career. But, 15 years and eight elections later, Duncan himself has decided to leave the House.<\/p>\n<p>Commenting this week regarding his work in the House in a statement about his decision to not seek reelection, Duncan <a href=\"http:\/\/wate.com\/2017\/07\/31\/congressman-jimmy-duncan-will-not-seek-reelection\/\">wrote<\/a>, \u201cDuring my time in Congress, I\u2019ve worked as hard as I can to fight for what I believe in \u2013 fiscal conservatism, smaller government, and a more humble foreign policy that puts America first.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Duncan is a member of the Advisory Board of the Ron Paul Institute for Peace and Prosperity.<\/p>\n<p><i>Reprinted from <a href=\"http:\/\/ronpaulinstitute.org\/\">The Ron Paul Institute for Peace &amp; Prosperity<\/a>.<\/i><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Rep. John J. Duncan, Jr. (R-TN) announced on Monday that he will not seek reelection in 2018 to the United States House of Representatives. In addition to being one of the longest-serving Republican members of the House (representing the second district of Tennessee since 1988), Duncan, who argues that being antiwar is a conservative position, [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":225,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_seopress_robots_primary_cat":"","_seopress_titles_title":"","_seopress_titles_desc":"","_seopress_robots_index":"","_et_pb_use_builder":"","_et_pb_old_content":"","_et_gb_content_width":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3],"tags":[],"coauthors":[],"class_list":["post-29466","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-news"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"meta_box":{"disable_donate_message":"","custom_donate_message":"","subtitle":""},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/29466","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/225"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=29466"}],"version-history":[{"count":6,"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/29466\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":29469,"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/29466\/revisions\/29469"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=29466"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=29466"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=29466"},{"taxonomy":"author","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/coauthors?post=29466"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}