{"id":3000,"date":"2006-09-22T14:42:15","date_gmt":"2006-09-22T21:42:15","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/2006\/09\/22\/torture-the-law-of-the-land-torture-mastermind-reviewed\/"},"modified":"2006-09-22T15:25:54","modified_gmt":"2006-09-22T22:25:54","slug":"torture-the-law-of-the-land-torture-mastermind-reviewed","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/2006\/09\/22\/torture-the-law-of-the-land-torture-mastermind-reviewed\/","title":{"rendered":"Torture the Law of the Land & Torture Mastermind Reviewed"},"content":{"rendered":"

The key players in the U.S. Senate have agreed with the Bush administration to retroactively legalize torture by U.S. government agents. The compromise deal struck yesterday will block prosecution for CIA officials who tortured detainees since 9\/11.\u00c2\u00a0 I would expect that, in the name of \u00e2\u20ac\u0153fair play,\u00e2\u20ac\u009d someone will begin pushing similar legislation to give immunity to U.S. military officials who tortured detainees in Afghanistan and Iraq.<\/p>\n

The legislative \u00e2\u20ac\u0153compromise\u00e2\u20ac\u009d blocks detainees from suing in federal court after they have been tortured.\u00c2\u00a0 Game, set, match.<\/p>\n

And it is worse than naive for Americans to comfort themselves with the notion that the U.S. government will only torture \u00e2\u20ac\u0153Islamo-fascists.\u00e2\u20ac\u009d The administration’s Enemies List is far more expansive.<\/p>\n

The deal is not\u00c2\u00a0yet\u00c2\u00a0carved into the statute book, so….<\/p>\n

On the same topic -\u00c2\u00a0The American Conservative posted online today<\/strong><\/a> my review of John Yoo’s new book, War by Other Means<\/strong>. Here are some outtakes of the review:<\/p>\n

George W. Bush has made absolutism respectable among American conservatives. And no one has done more pimping for president-as-Supreme-Leader than John Yoo, the former Justice Department official who helped create the \u00e2\u20ac\u0153commander-in-chief override\u00e2\u20ac\u009d doctrine, unleashing presidents from the confines of the law. At a time when Bush is pushing Congress to approve the use in military tribunals of confessions that resulted from torture, it is vital to understand the thinking of the Bush administration\u00e2\u20ac\u2122s most visible advocate of \u00e2\u20ac\u0153coercive interrogation.\u00e2\u20ac\u009d<\/p>\n

Yoo\u00e2\u20ac\u2122s new book, War by Other Means: An Insider\u00e2\u20ac\u2122s Account of the War on Terror<\/strong>, reads like a slippery lawyer\u00e2\u20ac\u2122s brief submitted to a dim judge who gets all his information from Fox News. Though Yoo\u00e2\u20ac\u2122s misrepresentations and omissions should provoke outrage, his book will likely receive accolades from many conservative reviewers. This new volume compliments Yoo\u00e2\u20ac\u2122s first book, The Powers of War and Peace, which revealed that the Founding Fathers intended to permit presidents to start wars on their own whims, regardless of what the Constitution says.<\/p>\n

Perhaps Yoo\u00e2\u20ac\u2122s authoritarian tendencies resulted from his time at Harvard, where empowering an elite is always in fashion. Yoo paints every proposal for limiting the president\u00e2\u20ac\u2122s power as a dangerous novelty. He is always trying to shift the burden of proof onto anyone who thinks the president should not be a czar.
\n……
\nWhile curtsying to the prevailing rhetoric on democracy, Yoo shows contempt for \u00e2\u20ac\u0153government by consent.\u00e2\u20ac\u009d He claims the 2004 election vindicated Bush\u00e2\u20ac\u2122s torture policy: \u00e2\u20ac\u0153Our nation had a presidential and congressional election after Abu Ghraib and the leaking of the [2002] memos. If the people had disagreed with administration policies, they could have made a change.\u00e2\u20ac\u009d<\/p>\n

How could the people judge the policy when the Bush administration was suppressing almost all information about it? There were no independent probes into the torture scandal during 2004. All the investigators were under the thumb of the Pentagon. The investigations were designed to look only downward\u00e2\u20ac\u201dwith no authority to pursue wrongdoing to the highest branches of the Pentagon and the White House. The Bush team succeeded in delaying the vast majority of damning revelations until after he was re-elected. Presumably, the public can \u00e2\u20ac\u0153approve\u00e2\u20ac\u009d atrocities even when the government deceives them about the actual events.<\/p>\n

Yoo reasons like a devious personal-injury lawyer\u00e2\u20ac\u201dyet it is the rights of the American people that are being run over. He is being feted by conservative foundations and think tanks, and often treated deferentially by liberals, for a theory of presidential power that would make Hobbes proud.<\/p>\n

Yoo believes Americans should presume that the government always has a good reason for violating the law, even when it deceives the citizens about the reasoning. Yoo\u00e2\u20ac\u2122s doctrines are absolutely unfit for any system with a pretense of self-government.****<\/p>\n

Comments\/condemnations welcome at I am welcoming comments at http:\/\/jimbovard.com\/blog\/2006\/09\/22\/torture-the-law-of-the-land-and-the-torture-mastermind-reviewed\/<\/a><\/p>\n

\u00c2\u00a0<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

The key players in the U.S. Senate have agreed with the Bush administration to retroactively legalize torture by U.S. government agents. The compromise deal struck yesterday will block prosecution for CIA officials who tortured detainees since 9\/11.\u00c2\u00a0 I would expect that, in the name of \u00e2\u20ac\u0153fair play,\u00e2\u20ac\u009d someone will begin pushing similar legislation to give […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":45,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_seopress_robots_primary_cat":"","_seopress_titles_title":"","_seopress_titles_desc":"","_seopress_robots_index":"","_et_pb_use_builder":"","_et_pb_old_content":"","_et_gb_content_width":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[],"tags":[676],"coauthors":[],"class_list":["post-3000","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","tag-antiwar-movement"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"meta_box":{"disable_donate_message":"","custom_donate_message":"","subtitle":""},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3000","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/45"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=3000"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3000\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=3000"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=3000"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=3000"},{"taxonomy":"author","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/coauthors?post=3000"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}