{"id":30452,"date":"2018-02-10T08:53:57","date_gmt":"2018-02-10T16:53:57","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/?p=30452"},"modified":"2018-02-10T08:53:57","modified_gmt":"2018-02-10T16:53:57","slug":"ikes-military-industrial-congressional-complex-is-alive-and-very-well","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/2018\/02\/10\/ikes-military-industrial-congressional-complex-is-alive-and-very-well\/","title":{"rendered":"Ike&#8217;s Military-Industrial-Congressional Complex Is Alive and Very Well"},"content":{"rendered":"<\/p>\n<div id=\"attachment_30454\" style=\"width: 565px\" class=\"wp-caption alignnone\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-30454\" src=\"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/02\/gi-money.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"555\" height=\"375\" class=\"size-full wp-image-30454\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/02\/gi-money-300x203.jpg 300w, https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/02\/gi-money.jpg 555w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 555px) 100vw, 555px\" \/><p id=\"caption-attachment-30454\" class=\"wp-caption-text\"><i>Look, Ma: More Money!  Don\u2019t Worry: We\u2019ll Spend It Wisely<\/i><\/p><\/div>\n<p>The new Congressional budget boosts military spending <a href=\"https:\/\/www.theguardian.com\/us-news\/2018\/feb\/09\/senate-budget-deal-us-military-spending\">in a big way<\/a>. Last night&#8217;s <a href=\"https:\/\/www.pbs.org\/newshour\/show\/why-congress-budget-solution-might-not-avert-a-shutdown\">PBS News report <\/a>documented how military spending is projected to increase by $160 billion over two years, but that doesn&#8217;t include &#8220;overseas contingency funding&#8221; for wars, which is another $160 billion over two years. Meanwhile, spending for the opioid crisis, which is killing roughly 60,000 Americans a year (more Americans than were killed in the Vietnam War), is set at a paltry $6 billion ($25 billion was requested).<\/p>\n<p>One thing is certain: <a href=\"https:\/\/bracingviews.com\/2014\/09\/05\/why-i-still-like-ike\/\">Ike was right<\/a> about the undue influence of the military-industrial-Congressional complex.<\/p>\n<p>The military talks about needing all these scores of billions to &#8220;rebuild.&#8221; And, sure, there are ships that need to be refitted, planes in need of repairs, equipment that needs to be restocked, and veterans who need to be cared for. But a massive increase in military and war spending, perhaps as high as $320 billion over two years, is a recipe for excessive waste and even more disastrous military adventurism.<\/p>\n<p>Even if you&#8217;re a supporter of big military budgets, this massive boost in military spending is bad news. Why? <strong>It doesn&#8217;t force the military to think<\/strong>. To set priorities. To define limits. To be creative.<\/p>\n<p>Perhaps you&#8217;ve heard of the expression, &#8220;Spending money like drunken sailors on shore leave.&#8221; Our military has been drunk with money since 9\/11. Is it really wise to give those &#8220;sailors&#8221; an enormous boost in the loose change they&#8217;re carrying, trusting them to spend it wisely?<\/p>\n<p><i>William J. Astore is a retired lieutenant colonel (USAF). He taught history for fifteen years at military and civilian schools and blogs at <a href=\"https:\/\/bracingviews.com\/\">Bracing Views<\/a>. He can be reached at <a href=\"mailto:wastore@pct.edu\">wastore@pct.edu<\/a>. Reprinted from <a href=\"https:\/\/bracingviews.com\/\">Bracing Views<\/a> with the author&#8217;s permission.<\/i><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>The new Congressional budget boosts military spending in a big way. Last night&#8217;s PBS News report documented how military spending is projected to increase by $160 billion over two years, but that doesn&#8217;t include &#8220;overseas contingency funding&#8221; for wars, which is another $160 billion over two years. Meanwhile, spending for the opioid crisis, which is [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":290,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_seopress_robots_primary_cat":"","_seopress_titles_title":"","_seopress_titles_desc":"","_seopress_robots_index":"","_et_pb_use_builder":"","_et_pb_old_content":"","_et_gb_content_width":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3],"tags":[],"coauthors":[],"class_list":["post-30452","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-news"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"meta_box":{"disable_donate_message":"","custom_donate_message":"","subtitle":""},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/30452","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/290"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=30452"}],"version-history":[{"count":4,"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/30452\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":30456,"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/30452\/revisions\/30456"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=30452"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=30452"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=30452"},{"taxonomy":"author","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/coauthors?post=30452"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}