{"id":31202,"date":"2018-05-30T17:25:46","date_gmt":"2018-05-31T01:25:46","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/?p=31202"},"modified":"2018-05-30T17:25:46","modified_gmt":"2018-05-31T01:25:46","slug":"bolton-adds-another-hardliner-to-the-nsc","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/2018\/05\/30\/bolton-adds-another-hardliner-to-the-nsc\/","title":{"rendered":"Bolton Adds Another Hardliner to the NSC"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><i>Originally appeared on <a href=\"http:\/\/www.theamericanconservative.com\/\">The American Conservative<\/a>.<\/i><\/p>\n<p>Curt Mills <a href=\"http:\/\/nationalinterest.org\/feature\/who-fred-fleitz-26037\">explains<\/a> who Fred Fleitz is and why it matters that he has been hired as John Bolton&#8217;s chief of staff on the National Security Council:<\/p>\n<p><i>But Fleitz\u2019s hiring signals three developments clearly: Bolton\u2019s propensity to tap hardline loyalists; Bolton\u2019s readiness to associate with Iran and North Korean regime change advocates; and Bolton\u2019s assiduous staffing of Russia investigation critics.<\/i><\/p>\n<p>Fleitz has been <a href=\"http:\/\/nymag.com\/daily\/intelligencer\/2018\/05\/bolton-fred-fleitz-center-security-policy-nsc-chief-of-staff.html?utm_source=tw&amp;utm_medium=s3&amp;utm_campaign=sharebutton-t\">working<\/a> for Frank Gaffney&#8217;s Center for Security Policy, which is known for both its wacky conspiracy theories about Islamist infiltration and its hard-line foreign policy views. Like Bolton, he was a vehement opponent of the nuclear deal, and absurdly <a href=\"https:\/\/www.nationalreview.com\/2014\/11\/are-we-already-conceding-bomb-iran-fred-fleitz\/\">claimed<\/a> in 2014 that Obama was &#8220;conceding&#8221; an Iranian nuclear weapon by negotiating the agreement. Bolton&#8217;s hiring of Fleitz is a reunion for the two, as <a href=\"https:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Frederick_H._Fleitz\">Fleitz<\/a> served as Bolton&#8217;s chief of staff when the latter worked in Bush&#8217;s State Department. It was there that he <a href=\"https:\/\/www.huffingtonpost.com\/arianna-huffington\/plamegate-the-john-bolton_b_7648.html\">earned the reputation of being Bolton&#8217;s &#8220;enforcer,&#8221;<\/a> and presumably that is the role he is going to reprise on the NSC. <\/p>\n<p>Fleitz&#8217;s position confirms that Bolton continues to remake the National Security Council in his image, and it shows once again the extent to which hard-line fringe figures have gained extraordinary influence in the Trump White House.<\/p>\n<p><i>Daniel Larison is a senior editor at <\/i><a href=\"http:\/\/www.theamericanconservative.com\/\">The American Conservative<\/a><i>, where he also keeps a solo <a href=\"http:\/\/www.theamericanconservative.com\/larison\">blog<\/a>. He has been published in the<\/i> New York Times Book Review, Dallas Morning News, Orthodox Life, Front Porch Republic, The American Scene, and Culture11<i>, and is a columnist for<\/i> The Week<i>. He holds a PhD in history from the University of Chicago, and resides in Dallas. Follow him on <a href=\"http:\/\/twitter.com\/DanielLarison\">Twitter<\/a>. This article is reprinted from<\/i><a href=\"http:\/\/www.theamericanconservative.com\/\"> The American Conservative<\/a><i> with permission.<\/i><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Originally appeared on The American Conservative. Curt Mills explains who Fred Fleitz is and why it matters that he has been hired as John Bolton&#8217;s chief of staff on the National Security Council: But Fleitz\u2019s hiring signals three developments clearly: Bolton\u2019s propensity to tap hardline loyalists; Bolton\u2019s readiness to associate with Iran and North Korean [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":56,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_seopress_robots_primary_cat":"","_seopress_titles_title":"","_seopress_titles_desc":"","_seopress_robots_index":"","_et_pb_use_builder":"","_et_pb_old_content":"","_et_gb_content_width":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3],"tags":[],"coauthors":[],"class_list":["post-31202","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-news"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"meta_box":{"disable_donate_message":"","custom_donate_message":"","subtitle":""},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/31202","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/56"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=31202"}],"version-history":[{"count":3,"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/31202\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":31204,"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/31202\/revisions\/31204"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=31202"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=31202"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=31202"},{"taxonomy":"author","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/coauthors?post=31202"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}