{"id":31285,"date":"2018-06-14T06:46:17","date_gmt":"2018-06-14T14:46:17","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/?p=31285"},"modified":"2018-06-14T06:46:17","modified_gmt":"2018-06-14T14:46:17","slug":"trumps-giving-diplomacy-a-chance-his-critics-should-too","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/2018\/06\/14\/trumps-giving-diplomacy-a-chance-his-critics-should-too\/","title":{"rendered":"Trump&#8217;s Giving Diplomacy a Chance. His&nbsp;Critics Should, Too."},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Some critics have knocked President Trump for making &#8220;too many concessions&#8221; to North Korean leader Kim Jong-un at the historic Singapore Summit &#8211; the first-ever meeting between a U.S. president and North Korean leader.<\/p>\n<p>Trump&#8217;s foreign policy instincts have had me white-knuckled for the past year and a half. But against a backdrop of possible nuclear war, it would be overly cynical not to recognize the meeting\u2019s potential for good.<\/p>\n<p>At best, the meeting set the stage for North Korea\u2019s denuclearization &#8211; and <a href=\"https:\/\/slate.com\/news-and-politics\/2018\/06\/the-korean-war-might-finally-come-to-an-end-heres-why-it-mattered.html\">possibly even an end<\/a> to the nearly 70-year-old, stalemated Korean War. If you\u2019re against war, this is a good development.<\/p>\n<p><!--more--><\/p>\n<p>Just six months ago, reasonable people had reasonable fears of the world\u2019s first two-sided nuclear war, as President Trump and North Korean leader Kim Jong Un traded <a href=\"https:\/\/www.huffingtonpost.com\/entry\/dotard-vs-rocketman-the-nuclear-standoff-that-rattled-2017_us_5a3e8bdce4b0b0e5a7a27be6\">middle-school insults<\/a> and flaunted their nuclear arsenals.<\/p>\n<p>There are still countless ways the negotiations could go wrong, and real reasons to fear that hardline members of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.cnbc.com\/2018\/06\/06\/bolton-takes-back-seat-but-remains-a-looming-presence-for-the-north-korea-summit.html\">administration<\/a> &#8211; and its <a href=\"https:\/\/www.nytimes.com\/2018\/06\/06\/opinion\/north-korea-summit-trump-kim.html\">opposition<\/a>, too &#8211; would allow that to happen. But diplomacy offers chances for bigger gains, and smaller losses, than war.<\/p>\n<p>Unfortunately, the US spends more than 20 times more on war and militarism than we do on diplomacy each year.<\/p>\n<p>Our choices have been stark.<\/p>\n<p>The US chose war in Iraq over diplomacy in 2003. Our leaders chose certain risk over likely rewards by pulling out of the Iran nuclear deal. And they chose a lone plunge backward over a carefully planned march forward when they stepped back from the Paris climate accord before that.<\/p>\n<p>This must not happen when it comes to the North Korea negotiations.<\/p>\n<p>The costs of war are horrifying. The current wars in Iraq and Afghanistan have cost the US<a href=\"http:\/\/watson.brown.edu\/costsofwar\/figures\/2017\/us-budgetary-costs-post-911-wars-through-fy2018-56-trillion\">$5.6 trillion<\/a>, and <a href=\"http:\/\/watson.brown.edu\/costsofwar\/papers\/summary\">6,800 US soldiers have lost their lives<\/a>. That doesn\u2019t include non-fatal casualties, or the human and economic costs of PTSD and family stress that echo far beyond the battlefield.<\/p>\n<p>And it doesn\u2019t count the <a href=\"http:\/\/watson.brown.edu\/costsofwar\/papers\/summary\">hundreds of thousands<\/a> of innocent civilians who have been needlessly killed throughout our warzones. A full-scale war with North Korea would likely be <a href=\"https:\/\/www.washingtonpost.com\/news\/monkey-cage\/wp\/2018\/01\/08\/a-new-korean-war-would-kill-more-u-s-military-personnel-than-you-might-think\/\">many times worse<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p>The North Korea negotiations are far from over, and could still tip from a fragile diplomacy back to middle-school insults and perhaps even to war. But we can and should be more optimistic than that. Diplomacy isn&#8217;t just the better way. It\u2019s the only way.<\/p>\n<p>For the Korean talks to work, this administration will have to value diplomacy more than it did in its narrow-minded rejection of the Iran deal. It will have to value diplomacy more than it did when it pulled out of the Paris climate agreement.<\/p>\n<p>There\u2019s so much to gain from open communication and keeping our word. And there\u2019s so much more to lose if we allow things to fall apart.<\/p>\n<p><em>Lindsay Koshgarian directs the National Priorities Project at the Institute for Policy Studies, which published an earlier version of this piece. Distributed by <a href=\"https:\/\/OtherWords.org\">OtherWords.org<\/a>.<\/em><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Some critics have knocked President Trump for making &#8220;too many concessions&#8221; to North Korean leader Kim Jong-un at the historic Singapore Summit &#8211; the first-ever meeting between a U.S. president and North Korean leader. Trump&#8217;s foreign policy instincts have had me white-knuckled for the past year and a half. But against a backdrop of possible [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":375,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_seopress_robots_primary_cat":"","_seopress_titles_title":"","_seopress_titles_desc":"","_seopress_robots_index":"","_et_pb_use_builder":"","_et_pb_old_content":"","_et_gb_content_width":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3],"tags":[],"coauthors":[],"class_list":["post-31285","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-news"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"meta_box":{"disable_donate_message":"","custom_donate_message":"","subtitle":""},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/31285","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/375"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=31285"}],"version-history":[{"count":4,"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/31285\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":31287,"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/31285\/revisions\/31287"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=31285"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=31285"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=31285"},{"taxonomy":"author","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/coauthors?post=31285"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}