{"id":3134,"date":"2006-12-05T12:21:42","date_gmt":"2006-12-05T19:21:42","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/2006\/12\/05\/biking-with-donald-rumsfeld\/"},"modified":"2006-12-05T12:37:48","modified_gmt":"2006-12-05T19:37:48","slug":"biking-with-donald-rumsfeld","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/2006\/12\/05\/biking-with-donald-rumsfeld\/","title":{"rendered":"Biking With Donald Rumsfeld"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Last week, someone <a href=\"http:\/\/www.nytimes.com\/2006\/12\/03\/world\/middleeast\/03military.html?n=Top%2fReference%2fTimes%20Topics%2fPeople%2fR%2fRumsfeld%2c%20Donald%20H%2e&#038;pagewanted=print\">slipped<\/a>    <em>New York Times<\/em> reporters Michael R. Gordon and David S. Cloud the secret    memo finished by Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld just two days before he    &#8220;resigned.&#8221; It was the last in a flurry of famed Rumsfeldian <a href=\"http:\/\/www.bbc.co.uk\/blogs\/thereporters\/adam_brookes\/2006\/11\/rumsfeld_open_case.html\">&#8220;snowflakes&#8221;<\/a>    that have fluttered down upon the Pentagon these past years. This one, though,    was &#8220;submitted&#8221; to the White House and clearly meant for the President&#8217;s eyes.    In it, the Secretary of Defense offered a veritable laundry list of possible    policy adjustments in Iraq, adding up to what, according to Gordon and Cloud,    is both an acknowledgement of failure and &#8220;a major course correction.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>Think of this last zany, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.juancole.com\/2006\/12\/rumsfelds-shocking-memo-over-100-dead.html\">only    semi-coherent<\/a> Rumsfeldian document &#8212; part of Washington&#8217;s grim ongoing    silly season over Iraq &#8212; as Rumsfeld&#8217;s last stand. In it, he quite literally    cycles (as in bicycles) back to the origins of the Bush administration&#8217;s shredded    Iraq policy. It is, in a pathetic sense, that policy stripped bare.<\/p>\n<p>Here are just three last-stand aspects of <a href=\"http:\/\/www.nytimes.com\/2006\/12\/03\/world\/middleeast\/03mtext.html?pagewanted=print\">the    memo<\/a> that have been largely or totally overlooked in most reporting:<\/p>\n<p>1. <em>&#8220;Begin modest withdrawals of U.S. and Coalition forces (start \u00e2\u20ac\u02dctaking    our hand off the bicycle seat&#8217;), so Iraqis know they have to pull up their socks,    step up and take responsibility for their country.&#8221;<\/em><\/p>\n<p>From the early, carefree, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.cnn.com\/2003\/US\/04\/11\/sprj.irq.pentagon\/\">&#8220;stuff    happens&#8221;<\/a> period of the occupation comes the wonderfully patronizing image    embedded in this mixed metaphor of a passage &#8212; though I suppose Iraqis perched    on bike seats could indeed have crumpled socks. The image of the Iraqi (child)    learning how to ride the bike of democracy &#8212; or whatever &#8212; with the American    (parent) looming behind, hand steadying the seat, was already not just a neocolonial,    but a neocon classic by the time the President used it back in May 2004. (In    fact, in an even more infantilizing fashion, he spoke of taking the <a href=\"http:\/\/www.cbsnews.com\/stories\/2004\/01\/19\/iraq\/main594228.shtml\">&#8220;training    wheels&#8221;<\/a> off the Iraqi bike.)<\/p>\n<p>Many others in the administration proudly used it as well. Rumsfeld in his    rococo fashion <a href=\"http:\/\/www.findarticles.com\/p\/articles\/mi_qn4156\/is_20040321\/ai_n12587629\/print\">elaborated    wildly<\/a> on the image in a speech to U.S. troops that same year:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>&#8220;Getting Iraq straightened out\u00e2\u20ac\u00a6 was like teaching a kid to ride a    bike: \u00e2\u20ac\u02dcThey&#8217;re learning, and you&#8217;re running down the street holding on to the    back of the seat. You know that if you take your hand off they could fall, so    you take a finger off and then two fingers, and pretty soon you&#8217;re just barely    touching it. You can&#8217;t know when you&#8217;re running down the street how many steps    you&#8217;re going to have to take. We can&#8217;t know that, but we&#8217;re off to a good start.'&#8221;<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>And now, long after kids stopped riding bikes in Iraq and started ending up    dead in ditches, our nearly former Defense Secretary just couldn&#8217;t help cycling    back to the good old days.<\/p>\n<p>2. <em>&#8220;Conduct an accelerated draw-down of U.S. bases. We have already reduced    from 110 to 55 bases. Plan to get down to 10 to 15 bases by April 2007, and    to 5 bases by July 2007.&#8221;<\/em><\/p>\n<p>Talk about cycling back to the beginning, Rumsfeld&#8217;s &#8220;major course correction&#8221;    takes us right to the original basing plans the Pentagon had on entering Iraq.    As the <em>New York Times<\/em> reported in a <a href=\"http:\/\/www.truthout.org\/docs_03\/042103B.shtml\">front-page    piece<\/a> on April 19, 2003 (and then no one, including reporters at the <em>Times<\/em>,    paid much attention to again), the Pentagon entered Iraq with plans already    on the drawing board to build four major bases well beyond urban areas. These    were to be <a href=\"http:\/\/www.tomdispatch.com\/index.mhtml?pid=59774\">permanent<\/a>    in all but name and, from them, the Bush administration planned to nail down    the oil heartlands of the planet (while making up for the loss &#8212; thanks to    Osama bin Laden&#8217;s efforts &#8212; of our bases in Saudi Arabia).<\/p>\n<p>Now, here we are, over three and a half catastrophic years later, back to those    four bases (built to the tune of multibillions of American taxpayer dollars)    plus one &#8212; undoubtedly the former Camp Victory, the huge American base that    grew up on the edge of Baghdad International Airport (as well, of course, as    the new, almost finished billion-dollar U.S. embassy with its &#8220;staff&#8221; of thousands    inside Baghdad&#8217;s Green Zone).<\/p>\n<p>3. <em>&#8220;Aggressively beef up the Iraqi MOD [Ministry of Defense] and MOI [Ministry    of the Interior], and other Iraqi ministries critical to the success of the    ISF [Iraqi Security Forces] &#8212; the Iraqi Ministries of Finance, Planning, Health,    Criminal Justice, Prisons, etc. &#8212; by reaching out to U.S. military retirees    and Reserve\/National Guard volunteers (i.e., give up on trying to get other    USG Departments to do it.)&#8221;<\/em><\/p>\n<p>This mad suggestion, hardly noticed by anyone, cycles us back to the attitude    with which Bush &#038; Co. first entered Iraq. Iraqi sovereignty? Who ever heard    of it? Just do what you want. Flood any ministry with a bunch of U.S. military    retirees, all of whom can have their heavy hands on untold Iraqi bureaucratic    bike seats. This is an idea just about as brilliant as every other one initiated    by this administration in Iraq.<\/p>\n<p>And why do I have a sneaking suspicion that all those &#8220;U.S. military retirees&#8221;    and other &#8220;volunteers&#8221; might just not rush to offer their services to Iraq&#8217;s    death-squad infiltrated Ministries of the Interior and Defense? If you biked    around that corner without those training wheels &#8212; and some body armor &#8212; I    suspect you&#8217;d be likely to find yourself in the Baghdad morgue in no time at    all.<\/p>\n<p>In this way was Rumsfeld&#8217;s last stand remarkably like his first pedal. If only,    after September 11, 2001, someone had left the training wheels on when the Bush    administration went pedaling off on its merry, shock-and-awe way.<\/p>\n<p><em>Cross-posted from <\/em><a href=\"http:\/\/www.thenation.com\/blogs\/notion\/_by-tom\">The   Nation<\/a><em><a href=\"http:\/\/www.thenation.com\/blogs\/notion\/_by-tom\"> blog<\/a>.   Visit <a href=\"http:\/\/www.tomdispatch.com\/\">TomDispatch<\/a> for more Tom Engelhardt.<\/em><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Last week, someone slipped New York Times reporters Michael R. Gordon and David S. Cloud the secret memo finished by Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld just two days before he &#8220;resigned.&#8221; It was the last in a flurry of famed Rumsfeldian &#8220;snowflakes&#8221; that have fluttered down upon the Pentagon these past years. This one, though, [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":47,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_seopress_robots_primary_cat":"","_seopress_titles_title":"","_seopress_titles_desc":"","_seopress_robots_index":"","_et_pb_use_builder":"","_et_pb_old_content":"","_et_gb_content_width":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[],"tags":[676],"coauthors":[],"class_list":["post-3134","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","tag-antiwar-movement"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"meta_box":{"disable_donate_message":"","custom_donate_message":"","subtitle":""},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3134","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/47"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=3134"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3134\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=3134"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=3134"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=3134"},{"taxonomy":"author","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/coauthors?post=3134"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}