Well, lordy be. A lawyer for The New York Times <\/i>has figured out that prosecuting WikiLeaks publisher Julian Assange might gore the ox of The Gray Lady herself.<\/p>\n
The Times<\/i>\u2019s deputy general counsel, David McCraw, told a group of judges on the West Coast on Tuesday that such prosecution would be a gut punch to free speech, according to Maria Dinzeo, writing<\/a> for the Courthouse News Service<\/i>.<\/p>\n Curiously, as of this writing, McCraw\u2019s words have found no mention in the Times <\/i>itself. In recent years, the newspaper has shown a marked proclivity to avoid printing anything that might risk its front row seat at the government trough.<\/p>\n <\/p>\n Stating the obvious, McCraw noted that the \u201cprosecution of him [Assange] would be a very, very bad precedent for publishers \u2026 he\u2019s sort of in a classic publisher\u2019s position and I think the law would have a very hard time drawing a distinction between The New York Times <\/i>and WikiLeaks.\u201d<\/p>\n That’s because, for one thing, the Times <\/i>itself published many stories based on classified information revealed by WikiLeaks and other sources. The paper decisively turned against Assange once WikiLeaks published the DNC and Podesta emails. <\/p>\n More broadly, no journalist in America since John Peter Zenger<\/a> in Colonial days has been indicted or imprisoned for their work. Unless American prosecutors could prove that Assange personally took part in the theft of classified material or someone’s emails, rather than just receiving and publishing them, prosecuting him merely for his publications would be a first since the British Governor General of New York, William Cosby, imprisoned Zenger in 1734 for ten months for printing articles critical of Cosby. Zenger was acquitted by a jury because what he had printed was proven to be factual \u2013 a claim WikiLeaks can also make.<\/p>\n McCraw went on to emphasize that, \u201cAssange should be afforded the same protections as a traditional journalist.\u201d The Times <\/i>lawyer avoided criticizing what the United Nations has branded \u2013 twice \u2013 the \u201carbitrary detention\u201d of Assange and his incommunicado, solitary confinement-like situation in the Ecuador embassy in London since March. Multiple reports indicate the new government of Ecuador will evict Assange into the hands of British police.<\/p>\n These days we need to be thankful for small favors. It’s nice to know the Times <\/i>now considers Assange a journalist, even though it did not spring to his defense when he was being widely branded a \u201chigh-tech terrorist\u201d \u2013 as can be seen here in my very last appearance<\/a> on CNN’s domestic broadcast almost eight years ago.<\/p>\n Mike Pompeo, when he was CIA director, called WikiLeaks a \u201cnon-state, hostile intelligence service,\u201d and Assange’s lawyers believe there is already a sealed indictment against him in the state of Virginia. Assange fears that if he is arrested on flimsy bail skipping charges he will be extradited to the United States. Is the Fourth Estate Dead?<\/b><\/p>\n Ten years ago I contended that The Gray Lady \u2013 like the rest of the Fourth Estate \u2013 was moribund. More recently, I have been saying it is dead. I now stand corrected. Rumors of its death have been exaggerated. But how does one characterize its current state?<\/p>\n Let me borrow a memorable phrase from philosopher Billy Crystal, playing Miracle Max in \u201cThe Princess Bride,\u201d while trying to bring the character Wesley back to life. He is just \u201cmostly dead,\u201d Chrystal insisted.<\/p>\n And so it is with today\u2019s corporate media, with a tiny chance, now that The New York Times<\/i>, watching out for its own equities, might help Assange avoid prosecution for practicing journalism. Actually, he has been accused so far of no crime of any kind.<\/p>\n Eight years ago, when the Sam Adams Associates for Integrity gave Assange its annual award, the Fourth Estate was a bit more than just a distant memory. So we attempted to put his award in historical perspective. Below is the text <\/a>of the citation presented to Assange, together with the traditional SAAI corner-brightener candlestick holder, by former UK Ambassador Craig Murray (himself an SAAI laureate) and Daniel Ellsberg. <\/p>\n
<\/b><\/p>\n
![](\"https:\/\/consortiumnews.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/07\/Assange-on-balcony.jpg\"){kind=link}