{"id":32310,"date":"2018-12-17T18:22:35","date_gmt":"2018-12-18T02:22:35","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/?p=32310"},"modified":"2018-12-17T18:22:35","modified_gmt":"2018-12-18T02:22:35","slug":"the-pentagon-budget-aim-high","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/2018\/12\/17\/the-pentagon-budget-aim-high\/","title":{"rendered":"The Pentagon Budget: Aim High!"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>As a candidate, Donald Trump <a href=\"https:\/\/bracingviews.com\/2017\/08\/29\/with-the-pentagon-trump-has-morphed-into-hillary-clinton\/\">occasionally tossed<\/a> a few rhetorical grenades in the Pentagon&#8217;s general direction. He said America&#8217;s wars wasted trillions of dollars. He said he was <a href=\"https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/watch?v=kul34O_yMLs\">smarter<\/a> than the generals on ISIS (&#8220;Believe me!&#8221;). He said the F-35 jet fighter cost way <a href=\"https:\/\/bracingviews.com\/2016\/12\/23\/the-f-35-fighter-not-invisible-to-trumps-radar\/\">too much<\/a>, along with a planned replacement for Air Force One. He said he&#8217;d be much tougher on companies like Lockheed Martin, Boeing, and other major defense contractors.<\/p>\n<p>Instead of toughness, Trump as president has proven to be the Pentagon&#8217;s lackey. Recently, he opined the Pentagon&#8217;s budget was out of control (&#8220;crazy&#8221;), and he suggested a 5% cut in fiscal year (FY) 2020. That trial balloon was shot down quickly as Trump directed Secretary of Defense Mattis to submit a record-setting <a href=\"https:\/\/www.politico.com\/story\/2018\/12\/09\/trump-pentagon-defense-spending-budget-1054068\">$750 billion budget<\/a> for FY 2020. This is roughly $50 billion more than the <a href=\"https:\/\/militarybenefits.info\/2018-defense-budget-overview\/\">FY 2018 budget<\/a> for &#8220;defense.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p><!--more--><\/p>\n<p>Trump&#8217;s big boost in spending put me to mind of a famous quip by Winston Churchill in the days of &#8220;Dreadnought&#8221; battleships. Prior to World War I, Britain was <a href=\"https:\/\/www.bbc.com\/news\/magazine-27641717\">squabbling over<\/a> how many of these very expensive battleships needed to be built to deter Germany and to keep command of the seas. Churchill&#8217;s famous quip:<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;The Admiralty had demanded six ships; the economists offered four; and we finally compromised on eight.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>In this case, the Pentagon had postured they needed roughly <a href=\"https:\/\/bracingviews.com\/2018\/12\/03\/the-pentagons-733-billionfloor\/\">$733 billion<\/a> in FY 2020, Trump had suggested $700 billion, and they compromised on $750 billion.<\/p>\n<p>Once again, Trump proves his mastery of &#8220;the art of the deal.&#8221; Not.<\/p>\n<p><i>William J. Astore is a retired lieutenant colonel (USAF). He taught history for fifteen years at military and civilian schools and blogs at <a href=\"https:\/\/bracingviews.com\/\">Bracing Views<\/a>. He can be reached at <a href=\"mailto:wastore@pct.edu\">wastore@pct.edu<\/a>. Reprinted from <a href=\"https:\/\/bracingviews.com\/\">Bracing Views<\/a> with the author&#8217;s permission.<\/i><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>As a candidate, Donald Trump occasionally tossed a few rhetorical grenades in the Pentagon&#8217;s general direction. He said America&#8217;s wars wasted trillions of dollars. He said he was smarter than the generals on ISIS (&#8220;Believe me!&#8221;). He said the F-35 jet fighter cost way too much, along with a planned replacement for Air Force One. [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":290,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_seopress_robots_primary_cat":"","_seopress_titles_title":"","_seopress_titles_desc":"","_seopress_robots_index":"","_et_pb_use_builder":"","_et_pb_old_content":"","_et_gb_content_width":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3],"tags":[],"coauthors":[],"class_list":["post-32310","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-news"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"meta_box":{"disable_donate_message":"","custom_donate_message":"","subtitle":""},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/32310","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/290"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=32310"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/32310\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":32312,"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/32310\/revisions\/32312"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=32310"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=32310"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=32310"},{"taxonomy":"author","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/coauthors?post=32310"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}