{"id":32643,"date":"2019-02-15T07:49:20","date_gmt":"2019-02-15T15:49:20","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/?p=32643"},"modified":"2019-02-15T07:49:20","modified_gmt":"2019-02-15T15:49:20","slug":"walter-b-jones-restoring-power-to-congress-act-would-repeal-the-2001-aumf","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/2019\/02\/15\/walter-b-jones-restoring-power-to-congress-act-would-repeal-the-2001-aumf\/","title":{"rendered":"Walter B. Jones Restoring Power to Congress Act Would Repeal the 2001 AUMF"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>In his work opposing United States wars overseas, Rep. Walter Jones (R-NC), before his death Sunday, put much effort into seeking a repeal of the 2001 authorization for use of military force (AUMF) that has been used by successive presidents as a basis for intervention and war across the world in the name of fighting terrorism. In the week before Jones&#8217; death, Rep. John Garamendi (D-CA) <a href=\"https:\/\/www.rollcall.com\/news\/new-bill-introduced-in-honor-of-rep-walter-jones-would-repeal-the-aumf\">introduced<\/a> the <a href=\"https:\/\/garamendi.house.gov\/sites\/garamendi.house.gov\/files\/GARAME_013_xml.pdf\">Walter B. Jones Restoring Power to Congress Act<\/a> (HR 966), with Jones as the original cosponsor, that would repeal that AUMF and thus eliminate a reason used for presidents to intervene overseas without particular congressional approval.<\/p>\n<p>Garamendi spoke fondly of Jones in Garamendi&#8217;s <a href=\"https:\/\/garamendi.house.gov\/media\/press-releases\/garamendi-introduces-armed-services-legislation-honor-walter-b-jones\">press release<\/a> announcing the introduction of the bill,:<\/p>\n<p><i>&#8216;Congress has a Constitutional responsibility to debate and declare war, and we have abdicated that responsibility for far too long,&#8217; Garamendi stated. &#8216;That is why I am introducing this legislation to repeal the 2001 AUMF within one year of enactment, which would provide ample time to debate this important issue in Congress. I am also grateful to recognize the leadership of my dear friend, Walter Jones, who is currently in hospice care. Walter has championed this cause for years, I have worked with him closely on this issue in Congress. I am grateful for his wisdom, passion, and advocacy.&#8217;<\/i><\/p>\n<p>In March of 2017, Jones and Garamendi spoke in-depth in a C-SPAN interview about their effort to end funding for the US government&#8217;s war in Afghanistan. You can read about and watch that interview <a href=\"http:\/\/www.ronpaulinstitute.org\/archives\/peace-and-prosperity\/2017\/march\/29\/rep-walter-jones-challenges-speaker-paul-ryan-s-refusal-to-allow-afghanistan-war-debate\/\">here<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p><!--more--><\/p>\n<p>In that interview, Jones said the 2001 AUMF has helped lead to a situation where &#8220;Congress is letting the president determine what is going to be done with our military when we have a constitutional duty to declare whether we want to send our men and women to die for this country or not.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>On Monday, Ron Paul spoke at his Ron Paul Liberty Report about Jones, Paul&#8217;s friend and US House of Representatives colleague who was a member of the Ron Paul Institute for Peace and Prosperity&#8217;s advisory board. You can watch Paul&#8217;s discussion of Jones <a href=\"http:\/\/ronpaulinstitute.org\/archives\/featured-articles\/2019\/february\/11\/walter-jones-hero-of-peace\/\">here<\/a>. <\/p>\n<p><i>Reprinted from <a href=\"http:\/\/ronpaulinstitute.org\/\">The Ron Paul Institute for Peace &amp; Prosperity<\/a>.<\/i><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>In his work opposing United States wars overseas, Rep. Walter Jones (R-NC), before his death Sunday, put much effort into seeking a repeal of the 2001 authorization for use of military force (AUMF) that has been used by successive presidents as a basis for intervention and war across the world in the name of fighting [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":225,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_seopress_robots_primary_cat":"","_seopress_titles_title":"","_seopress_titles_desc":"","_seopress_robots_index":"","_et_pb_use_builder":"","_et_pb_old_content":"","_et_gb_content_width":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3],"tags":[],"coauthors":[],"class_list":["post-32643","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-news"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"meta_box":{"disable_donate_message":"","custom_donate_message":"","subtitle":""},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/32643","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/225"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=32643"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/32643\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":32645,"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/32643\/revisions\/32645"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=32643"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=32643"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=32643"},{"taxonomy":"author","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/coauthors?post=32643"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}