{"id":3279,"date":"2007-02-14T09:35:59","date_gmt":"2007-02-14T16:35:59","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/2007\/02\/14\/people-im-sick-of-part-ii-camille-paglia\/"},"modified":"2007-02-14T09:44:27","modified_gmt":"2007-02-14T16:44:27","slug":"people-im-sick-of-part-ii-camille-paglia","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/2007\/02\/14\/people-im-sick-of-part-ii-camille-paglia\/","title":{"rendered":"People I&#8217;m Sick Of: Part II &#8212; Camille Paglia"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>I could write an entire series of blog posts around the theme &#8220;People I&#8217;m Sick Of.&#8221; As a matter of fact, I think I will &#8230;.<\/p>\n<p>You can read\u00c2\u00a0the first entry\u00c2\u00a0in the series <a href=\"http:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/2007\/02\/14\/3278\/\">here<\/a>. And while I&#8217;m on the subject, there&#8217;s somebody else whose undeserved fame and political pontifications are as irritating as &#8212; well, as Arianna Huffington&#8217;s. I&#8217;m talking about <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Camille_Paglia\">Camille Paglia<\/a>, author of <em>Sexual Personae<\/em>, a head-ache-producing tome of inordinate length and middlebrow airs, who, in the first installment of her revived monthly &#8220;column&#8221; for Salon.com, has <a href=\"http:\/\/www.salon.com\/opinion\/paglia\/2007\/02\/14\/return\/index.html\">this to say<\/a> about the death of Anna Nicole Smith :<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>ABC&#8217;s &#8220;Nightline&#8221; called via my publisher for comment, but I felt far too upset to go on TV. Nevertheless, I was riveted to the tube all night and didn&#8217;t mind in the least that this tabloid drama, with its mythic themes of ambiguous paternity and contested wealth, had pushed Iraq to the back burner.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>Yeah, right, Camille: it&#8217;s <em>perfectly okay<\/em> that we should look away from the horrific mess we&#8217;ve created in Iraq &#8212; a country that never threatened us, couldn&#8217;t threaten us, and posed no threat to its neighbors, and yet which we continue to violate and torture with impunity &#8212; to feast our eyes on the spectacle of our own decadence. But, of course, Camille is in <em>favor<\/em> of decadence, as she&#8217;s told us many times &#8212; her own celebrity yet another indication that our over-ripeness is practically terminal.<\/p>\n<p>P.S. Oh, and don&#8217;t forget how Paglia backed away from raising her voice in protest against the war back when it really counted. In an <a href=\"http:\/\/dir.salon.com\/story\/opinion\/feature\/2003\/02\/07\/paglia\/index.html?pn=4\">interview<\/a> with Salon.com [February 7, 2003] , she was asked why more public figures weren&#8217;t speaking out about the war, both pro and con. Her answer was that she didn&#8217;t want to be put in the same category as &#8220;the intellectuals like Susan Sontag and Noam Chomsky who&#8217;ve made a career abroad out of anti-Americanism. Sontag&#8217;s made no secret of her lifelong adulation of all things European. My take is different: My immigrant family escaped poverty in Italy, and so I look at America in a very positive, celebratory way. So I&#8217;m reluctant to become part of this easy chorus of anti-Americanism. I also don&#8217;t want to do anything to undermine national morale, if we are indeed going to war. It&#8217;s wrong to be divisive when families have parents or children in danger on the front lines. I don&#8217;t want to add to their grief.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>Ah, but she doesn&#8217;t mind being &#8220;divisive&#8221; now that&#8217;s it&#8217;s popular to be against the war &#8212; and to heck with anyone&#8217;s grief, eh Camille?<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>I could write an entire series of blog posts around the theme &#8220;People I&#8217;m Sick Of.&#8221; As a matter of fact, I think I will &#8230;. You can read\u00c2\u00a0the first entry\u00c2\u00a0in the series here. And while I&#8217;m on the subject, there&#8217;s somebody else whose undeserved fame and political pontifications are as irritating as &#8212; well, [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":6,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_seopress_robots_primary_cat":"","_seopress_titles_title":"","_seopress_titles_desc":"","_seopress_robots_index":"","_et_pb_use_builder":"","_et_pb_old_content":"","_et_gb_content_width":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[],"tags":[676],"coauthors":[],"class_list":["post-3279","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","tag-antiwar-movement"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"meta_box":{"disable_donate_message":"","custom_donate_message":"","subtitle":""},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3279","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/6"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=3279"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3279\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=3279"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=3279"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=3279"},{"taxonomy":"author","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/coauthors?post=3279"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}