{"id":33843,"date":"2019-09-25T05:41:03","date_gmt":"2019-09-25T13:41:03","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/?p=33843"},"modified":"2019-09-25T05:41:03","modified_gmt":"2019-09-25T13:41:03","slug":"of-premature-withdrawals-forever-wars-and-the-us-military","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/2019\/09\/25\/of-premature-withdrawals-forever-wars-and-the-us-military\/","title":{"rendered":"Of Premature Withdrawals, Forever Wars, and the US Military"},"content":{"rendered":"<div id=\"attachment_33845\" style=\"width: 560px\" class=\"wp-caption alignnone\"><a href=\"https:\/\/bracingviews.files.wordpress.com\/2019\/09\/generalsintrumptransitioncnn1216.jpg?w=863\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-33845\" src=\"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/09\/astore.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"550\" height=\"321\" class=\"size-full wp-image-33845\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/09\/astore-300x175.jpg 300w, https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/09\/astore.jpg 550w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 550px) 100vw, 550px\" \/><\/a><p id=\"caption-attachment-33845\" class=\"wp-caption-text\"><i>Remember these generals?  The \u201cadults in the room\u201d for Trump?  How well did that work out?<\/i><\/p><\/div>\n<p>As the Trump administration <a href=\"https:\/\/www.democracynow.org\/2019\/9\/23\/headlines\/us_to_send_troops_to_saudi_arabia_impose_iran_sanctions_as_rouhani_heads_to_unga_with_peace_plan\">prepares to deploy<\/a> more U.S. troops to serve the needs of Saudi Arabia, I got to thinking about America&#8217;s forever wars in the Middle East and Central Asia. Back on August 17th, I clipped an article from the <em>New York Times<\/em> entitled &#8220;Debate Flares Over Afghanistan as Trump Considers Troop Withdrawal.&#8221; I noted the usual &#8220;arguments&#8221; presented by US military leaders and chickenhawks of both parties. That withdrawals would constitute a &#8220;retreat&#8221; that would be &#8220;premature&#8221; and &#8220;reckless.&#8221; That US troops had to remain to counter &#8220;an enduring terrorist threat.&#8221; That the Taliban enemy had perfected &#8220;weasel language&#8221; that would allow them to win any peace treaty. Making his usual appearance was General (retired) David Petraeus, who warned ominously that a complete withdrawal from Afghanistan &#8220;would be even more ill-advised and risky than the Obama administration&#8217;s disengagement from Iraq.&#8221; Petraeus, of course, has argued for a <a href=\"https:\/\/bracingviews.com\/2019\/01\/07\/the-bankruptcy-of-conventional-wisdom-at-the-pentagon\/\">generational commitment<\/a> to Afghanistan that could last as long as seventy years.<\/p>\n<p>A few points to make here:<\/p>\n<p>1. A US withdrawal wouldn&#8217;t be &#8220;premature.&#8221; Rather, it&#8217;s at least seventeen years overdue.<\/p>\n<p>2. Terrorist threats are nothing new (I was <a href=\"https:\/\/bracingviews.com\/2013\/06\/05\/what-is-terrorism\/\">reading<\/a> about them on active duty in 1985). Moreover, they are often fed by the presence of US troops and bases as well as by &#8220;kinetic&#8221; actions, i.e. killing people, especially <a href=\"https:\/\/bracingviews.com\/2017\/11\/19\/u-s-air-strikes-and-civilian-deaths-in-the-war-on-terror\/\">innocent civilians<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p><!--more--><\/p>\n<p>3. It&#8217;s funny that the Taliban can&#8217;t be trusted for its &#8220;weasel&#8221; language, whereas Americans always negotiate in good faith.<\/p>\n<p>4. Why is Petraeus, a man who <a href=\"https:\/\/bracingviews.com\/2016\/10\/22\/why-is-petraeus-an-expert-on-mosul\/\">disgraced himself<\/a> by illegally sharing classified information with his mistress, always the go-to guy for advice on any military situation?<\/p>\n<p>Speaking of &#8220;premature withdrawals,&#8221; Tom Engelhardt noted how these same &#8220;arguments&#8221; <a href=\"http:\/\/www.tomdispatch.com\/post\/175216\">were used<\/a> to support the Iraq War in 2010. The war song always remains the same: any military withdrawal is &#8220;premature&#8221; without total US victory (whatever that may mean).<\/p>\n<p>I swear if the US military had had its way, US forces would still be in Vietnam, and generals would still be arguing that withdrawal from Southeast Asia is &#8220;premature.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>In 2016, then-Candidate Trump deplored America&#8217;s dumb and costly wars, yet as President he now embraces the same tired tactics of the generals and their neo-con enablers. All these men have a great fear of premature withdrawal &#8212; are they confusing it with premature ejaculation?<\/p>\n<p>Even as America&#8217;s leaders boast about having the <a href=\"http:\/\/www.tomdispatch.com\/post\/175337\/tomgram:_william_astore,_we're_number_one_(in_self-promotion)\/\">world&#8217;s greatest<\/a> and most powerful military, their actions betray fears of defeat, of a lack of potency, and a concern they&#8217;re being played (i.e. those &#8220;weasel&#8221; words). And indeed they are losing, they are showcasing their own impotence, they are being played, as long as these disastrous wars persist.<\/p>\n<p><i>William J. Astore is a retired lieutenant colonel (USAF). He taught history for fifteen years at military and civilian schools and blogs at <a href=\"https:\/\/bracingviews.com\/\">Bracing Views<\/a>. He can be reached at <a href=\"mailto:wastore@pct.edu\">wastore@pct.edu<\/a>. Reprinted from <a href=\"https:\/\/bracingviews.com\/\">Bracing Views<\/a> with the author&#8217;s permission.<\/i><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>As the Trump administration prepares to deploy more U.S. troops to serve the needs of Saudi Arabia, I got to thinking about America&#8217;s forever wars in the Middle East and Central Asia. Back on August 17th, I clipped an article from the New York Times entitled &#8220;Debate Flares Over Afghanistan as Trump Considers Troop Withdrawal.&#8221; [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":290,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_seopress_robots_primary_cat":"","_seopress_titles_title":"","_seopress_titles_desc":"","_seopress_robots_index":"","_et_pb_use_builder":"","_et_pb_old_content":"","_et_gb_content_width":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3],"tags":[],"coauthors":[],"class_list":["post-33843","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-news"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"meta_box":{"disable_donate_message":"","custom_donate_message":"","subtitle":""},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/33843","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/290"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=33843"}],"version-history":[{"count":3,"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/33843\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":33847,"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/33843\/revisions\/33847"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=33843"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=33843"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=33843"},{"taxonomy":"author","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/coauthors?post=33843"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}