{"id":340,"date":"2003-12-13T04:23:02","date_gmt":"2003-12-13T11:23:02","guid":{"rendered":""},"modified":"2003-12-13T04:23:02","modified_gmt":"2003-12-13T11:23:02","slug":"success-in-iraq","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/2003\/12\/13\/success-in-iraq\/","title":{"rendered":"Success in Iraq?"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>The following email is circulating between war-supporters in an apparent attempt to refute the claims that the Iraqi occupation has become a quagmire.  I thought that I would respond to each point made.  My responses are the non-italic text.<\/p>\n<p>Subject: Iraq a Success<\/p>\n<p><i>This is for those who are discouraged at the constant bombardment of negative news about Iraq from the liberal, anti-Bush media, and also for those who just want to be critical for other reasons.<\/p>\n<p>SINCE PRESIDENT BUSH DECLARED AN END TO MAJOR COMBAT ON MAY 1:<\/i> [<a href=\"http:\/\/antiwar.com\/ewens\/casualties.html\">319 US troops have died<\/a>]<\/p>\n<p>&#8211; <i>the first battalion of the new Iraqi Army has graduated and is on active duty.<\/i><\/p>\n<p>The Daily Telegraph <a href=\"http:\/\/dailytelegraph.news.com.au\/story.jsp?sectionid=1274&#038;storyid=625793\">reports<\/a>:<br \/>\n&#8221; About 300 of the 700 members in the first new Iraqi army battalion set up by the US-led coalition have resigned, a coalition official said today. &#8221;<\/p>\n<p>&#8211; <i>over 60,000 Iraqis now provide security to their fellow citizens.<\/i><\/p>\n<p>Um, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/ewens\/casualties.html\">what security<\/a>?<\/p>\n<p>&#8211;<i> nearly all of Iraq&#8217;s 400 courts are functioning.<\/i><\/p>\n<p>Functioning as well as&#8230;.?  I assume this is a US gov&#8217;t &#8220;fact.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>&#8211;<i>the Iraqi judiciary is fully independent.<\/i><\/p>\n<p>Ahhh, as independent as the <i>American appointed<\/i> Iraqi Council?<\/p>\n<p>&#8211;<i>on Monday, October 6 power generation hit 4,518 megawatts-exceeding<br \/>\nthe pre-war average.<\/i><\/p>\n<p>I thought we went to Iraq to &#8220;rid the world of Saddam and his WMD&#8221; not &#8220;bring power back to prewar levels.&#8221;  Moreover, is this really an <i>accomplishment<\/i> when we remember that it was American bombs that created the lower power output?  But I digress.<\/p>\n<p>&#8211;<i>all 22 universities and 43 technical institutes and colleges are open, as are nearly all primary and secondary schools.<\/i><\/p>\n<p>See above point.  Simply, this is the way is was <i>supposed<\/i> to be, it is not an accomplishment per se.  It is kind of like saying: &#8220;My local fire department put out a fire.&#8221;  Yeah, so what?<\/p>\n<p>&#8211;<i> by October 1, Coalition forces had rehabbed over 1,500 schools &#8211; 500 more than their target.<\/i><\/p>\n<p>Hmmm, why did they need rehab?  Also, since when was US taxpayer money supposed to be used for <i>foreign<\/i> schools?  I recommend you visit your nearest local inner city school to understand where gov&#8217;t money is truly needed.<\/p>\n<p>&#8211; <i>teachers earn from 12 to 25 times their former salaries.<\/i><\/p>\n<p>So what?  It is probably <a href=\"http:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/ewens\/dinar.html\">inflation<\/a>.  <\/p>\n<p>&#8211;<i>all 240 hospitals and more than 1200 clinics are open.<\/i><\/p>\n<p>They <a href=\"http:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/ewens\/casualties.html\">better be<\/a>. <\/p>\n<p>&#8211;<i>doctor&#8217;s salaries are at least eight times what they were under<br \/>\nSaddam.<\/i><\/p>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/orig\/atraqchi5.html\">High demand<\/a> = high wage.  Basic economics. <\/p>\n<p>&#8211;<i>95 percent of all pre-war bank customers have service and first-time customers are opening accounts daily.<\/i><\/p>\n<p>Wait, the US military is spending my tax-money gathering these type of statistics?  Just for that, I think I will disregard this point.   And here&#8217;s some <i>real<\/i> <a href=\"http:\/\/www.fff.org\/comment\/com0312d.asp\">economic freedom<\/a>.<!--more--><\/p>\n<p>&#8211;<i>pharmaceutical distribution has gone from essentially nothing to 700<br \/>\ntons in May to a current total of 12,000 tons.<\/i><\/p>\n<p>Yeah, that would make sense.  Remember those <a href=\"http:\/\/members.tripod.com\/~drunkensun\/mrr.html\">Iraqi sanctions<\/a> that denied the importation of basic medicines so Saddam couldn&#8217;t build those&#8230;missing&#8230;WMDs?  Apparently, we are returning what we held back.<\/p>\n<p>&#8211;<i>the Coalition has helped administer over 22 million vaccination doses<br \/>\nto Iraq&#8217;s children.<\/i><\/p>\n<p>I suppose that is what is required when 170,000 foreign troops occupy urban areas and bring their own foreign diseases.<\/p>\n<p>&#8211;<i>a Coalition program has cleared over 14,000 kilometers of Iraq&#8217;s 27,000 kilometers of weed-choked canals.  They now irrigate tens of thousands of farms.  This project has created jobs for more than 100,000 Iraqi men and women.<\/i><\/p>\n<p>Once again, the blame could fall on American shoulders: 12 years of sanctions limited the availability of proper irrigation equipment.  100,000 new jobs is hardly a dent in the a population of 25 million with an estimated 80% unemployment. <\/p>\n<p>&#8211;<i>we have restored over three-quarters of pre-war telephone services and over two-thirds of the potable water production. There are 4,900 full-service connections.  We expect 50,000 by January first.<\/i><\/p>\n<p>You break it, you fix it.  &#8220;We expect&#8221;?  Just like &#8220;we&#8221; expected a stable, democratic Iraq by end of year?<\/p>\n<p>&#8211;<i>.the wheels of commerce are turning.  From bicycles to satellite dishes to cars and trucks, businesses are coming to life in all major cities and towns.<\/i><\/p>\n<p>That&#8217;s kind of vague&#8230;.I suppose this could again be attributed to the removal of the sanctions.  <\/p>\n<p>&#8211;<i>Iraqi banks are making loans to finance businesses.<\/i><\/p>\n<p>I gather with <i>American<\/i> tax-money.<\/p>\n<p>&#8211;<i>the central bank is fully independent.<\/i><\/p>\n<p>I would have to see it to believe it.   The US gov&#8217;t would let the Iraqis run their own currency, set their own exchange rates and issue their own gov&#8217;t bonds?  I think they should let the population vote first.<\/p>\n<p>&#8211;<i>Iraq has one of the world&#8217;s most growth-oriented investment and banking laws.<\/i><\/p>\n<p>Vacuous P.R.-speak.<\/p>\n<p>&#8211;<i>Iraq (has) a single, unified currency for the first time in 15 years.<\/i><\/p>\n<p>A currency the US forced upon them: the Swiss dinar.  Now that&#8217;s freedom!<\/p>\n<p>&#8211;<i>satellite dishes are legal.<\/i><\/p>\n<p>If I haven&#8217;t made this point already&#8230;1.  I don&#8217;t care.  2.  Wasn&#8217;t this a war about ridding the world of evil, not bringing porno to the Middle East?<\/p>\n<p>&#8211;<i>foreign journalists aren&#8217;t on 10-day visas paying mandatory and extortionate fees to the Ministry of Information for minder&#8217;s and other government spies.<\/i><\/p>\n<p>If the US gov&#8217;t&#8217;s position on the media is any indication (i.e. the barring of cameras at military funeral processions), I bet that this new &#8220;freedom&#8221; is fairly limited and arbitrary.<\/p>\n<p>There are many many more, so come back tomorrow for the full response.  <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>The following email is circulating between war-supporters in an apparent attempt to refute the claims that the Iraqi occupation has become a quagmire. I thought that I would respond to each point made. My responses are the non-italic text. Subject: Iraq a Success This is for those who are discouraged at the constant bombardment of [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_seopress_robots_primary_cat":"","_seopress_titles_title":"","_seopress_titles_desc":"","_seopress_robots_index":"","_et_pb_use_builder":"","_et_pb_old_content":"","_et_gb_content_width":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[],"tags":[676],"coauthors":[],"class_list":["post-340","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","tag-antiwar-movement"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"meta_box":{"disable_donate_message":"","custom_donate_message":"","subtitle":""},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/340","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=340"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/340\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=340"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=340"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=340"},{"taxonomy":"author","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/coauthors?post=340"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}