{"id":3466,"date":"2007-04-24T07:44:58","date_gmt":"2007-04-24T14:44:58","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/2007\/04\/24\/bushian-thinking-infects-the-drug-war\/"},"modified":"2007-04-24T07:44:58","modified_gmt":"2007-04-24T14:44:58","slug":"bushian-thinking-infects-the-drug-war","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/2007\/04\/24\/bushian-thinking-infects-the-drug-war\/","title":{"rendered":"Bushian Thinking Infects the Drug War"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Nearly every day there&#8217;s a story about Bush or <a href=\"http:\/\/wkbt.com\/Global\/story.asp?S=6409725\">some other official<\/a> (not to mention the <a href=\"http:\/\/www.realcities.com\/mld\/krwashington\/news\/world\/17011767.htm\">embarrassingly<\/a> <a href=\"http:\/\/www.realcities.com\/mld\/krwashington\/news\/world\/17011767.htm\">ridiculous<\/a> <a href=\"http:\/\/www.nytimes.com\/2007\/04\/03\/world\/middleeast\/03mccain.html?ex=1333252800&#038;en=6d4cc90785eb9d17&#038;ei=5090&#038;partner=rssuserland&#038;emc=rss\">John McCain<\/a>) claiming <a href=\"http:\/\/news.yahoo.com\/s\/afp\/20070423\/wl_mideast_afp\/uscongressiraqbush_070423145626\">sectarian violence is dropping<\/a>, Baghdad is safer, Iraq is &#8220;<a href=\"http:\/\/newsblogs.chicagotribune.com\/news_theswamp\/2007\/04\/bush_some_proge.html\">making progress<\/a>.&#8221; But periodically throughout the war, usually when there is a spike in violence, we hear that such spikes are a good thing, because it signals that all is not well with the insurgency, and that they are &#8220;<a href=\"http:\/\/thenexthurrah.typepad.com\/the_next_hurrah\/2006\/03\/36_months_of_de.html\">desperate<\/a>&#8221; and &#8220;<a href=\"http:\/\/thinkprogress.org\/2007\/02\/04\/kristol-worried\/\">worried<\/a>.&#8221; Well such <a href=\"http:\/\/www.deanesmay.com\/archives\/000391.html\">omelette-making<\/a> (and anti-logical) thinking has bled into the office of the drug czar.<\/p>\n<p>This morning over my waffles and caf\u00c3\u00a9 con leche, I read in <em>Men&#8217;s Vogue<\/em> a piece titled &#8220;<a href=\"http:\/\/www.mensvogue.com\/business\/blackbook\/articles\/2007\/02\/budding_invasion\">A Budding Invasion<\/a>.&#8221; I was instantly annoyed by the embedded reporter, official line-toeing tone of the article (&#8220;cartel henchmen,&#8221; &#8220;growers leave an eco-disaster,&#8221; &#8220;Can anyone halt the harvest?&#8221;), but what really caught my eye was this bit:<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;Gruesome violence afflicts Michoac\u00c3\u00a1n\u00e2\u20ac\u201dstomping grounds of some of the cartels that dominate the American marijuana market\u00e2\u20ac\u201dwhere cartel henchmen have lately developed a partiality for leaving human heads, with written warnings attached, outside government offices. Last year they rolled five of them onto a discotheque dance floor&#8230;.The bloodshed is dismaying, but [Deputy Drug Czar Scott] Burns sees it as a potentially promising sign. <strong>&#8216;The violence can be an indication of many things, such as disrupting the cartels,&#8217;<\/strong> he says. <strong>&#8216;If everything is running smoothly, there&#8217;s no reason to shoot somebody. It can be an indication of good work by the Mexican and U.S. governments.&#8217;<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Got that? The more heads roll onto Uruapan&#8217;s dance floors, the better Burnsie sleeps at night because he takes it as a sign that he is doing his job better. That job? To tell adult Americans what kind of plants they can ingest. A true hero.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Nearly every day there&#8217;s a story about Bush or some other official (not to mention the embarrassingly ridiculous John McCain) claiming sectarian violence is dropping, Baghdad is safer, Iraq is &#8220;making progress.&#8221; But periodically throughout the war, usually when there is a spike in violence, we hear that such spikes are a good thing, because [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":10,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_seopress_robots_primary_cat":"","_seopress_titles_title":"","_seopress_titles_desc":"","_seopress_robots_index":"","_et_pb_use_builder":"","_et_pb_old_content":"","_et_gb_content_width":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[],"tags":[676],"coauthors":[],"class_list":["post-3466","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","tag-antiwar-movement"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"meta_box":{"disable_donate_message":"","custom_donate_message":"","subtitle":""},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3466","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/10"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=3466"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3466\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=3466"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=3466"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=3466"},{"taxonomy":"author","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/coauthors?post=3466"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}