{"id":3508,"date":"2007-05-06T22:20:57","date_gmt":"2007-05-07T05:20:57","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/2007\/05\/06\/so-much-for-effort\/"},"modified":"2007-05-06T22:23:16","modified_gmt":"2007-05-07T05:23:16","slug":"so-much-for-effort","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/2007\/05\/06\/so-much-for-effort\/","title":{"rendered":"So much for effort&#8230;"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Last week, it was <a href=\"http:\/\/www.iht.com\/articles\/ap\/2007\/05\/02\/asia\/AS-GEN-Afghan-Civilian-Deaths.php\">announced<\/a> that NATO&#8217;s anti-Taliban raids in Kandahar province had killed approximately 50 civilians. Afghan President Hamid Karzai, for his part, let it be known that he is <a href=\"http:\/\/www.alertnet.org\/thenews\/newsdesk\/SP174602.htm\">&#8216;losing patience&#8217; with all the civilians NATO has been killing<\/a>. As the US simultaneously denied that any such thing had happened and promised to look into it and <a href=\"http:\/\/rawstory.com\/news\/afp\/US_blames_Taliban_for_Afghan_civili_05032007.html\">insisted<\/a> that it was entirely the Taliban&#8217;s fault, NATO officials insisted that in the future they would <a href=\"http:\/\/www.reuters.com\/article\/homepageCrisis\/idUSISL198351._CH_.2400\">try to keep the civilian massacres to a minimum<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p>Needless to say, this is quite a messy situation. Italian Foreign Minister Massimo D&#8217;Alema <a href=\"http:\/\/www.alertnet.org\/thenews\/newsdesk\/L02608750.htm\">warned<\/a> that the civilian death toll could cost the US the support of Afghanistan&#8217;s civilian population (to the extent they ever had it). This is one of those situations that needs to be treated with kid gloves.<\/p>\n<p>Fast forward to Friday, and Afghan officials say that days after the initial killings: the very day NATO promised to be more careful in the future in fact, a US bombing attack <a href=\"http:\/\/www.abc.net.au\/news\/newsitems\/200705\/s1914856.htm\">killed 13 more<\/a> civilians. Needless to say, the Pentagon once again had no information that such an incident had ever taken place, but they promised to look into it&#8230; again.<\/p>\n<p>Right about now, a lot of you are probably thinking this story sounds kind of familiar. In fact, it happens with surprising regularity, the civilian body counts, the initial denial, the <a href=\"http:\/\/archive.southcoasttoday.com\/daily\/10-06\/10-19-06\/16world-nation.htm\">eventually admissions<\/a>, Karzai&#8217;s mock outrage, even the part where NATO <a href=\"http:\/\/www.iht.com\/articles\/ap\/2007\/01\/10\/europe\/EU-GEN-NATO-Afghanistan.php\">promises to make wholesale changes<\/a> so it doesn&#8217;t happen again.<\/p>\n<p>What efforts NATO has actually undertaken in the past (or will undertake in the present incident) I&#8217;m not sure, but one thing is painfully obviously to the civilian population living under their occupation, it&#8217;s not good enough. NATO troops have killed civilians in at least 12 separate reported incidents in 2007 alone: their bodycount since this ill-conceived war began must simply be astronomical. Most of us manage to get through our entire lives without slaughtering dozens of innocent villagers: is it to much to ask that NATO manage to go more than a few weeks in-between atrocities?<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Last week, it was announced that NATO&#8217;s anti-Taliban raids in Kandahar province had killed approximately 50 civilians. Afghan President Hamid Karzai, for his part, let it be known that he is &#8216;losing patience&#8217; with all the civilians NATO has been killing. As the US simultaneously denied that any such thing had happened and promised to [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":32,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_seopress_robots_primary_cat":"","_seopress_titles_title":"","_seopress_titles_desc":"","_seopress_robots_index":"","_et_pb_use_builder":"","_et_pb_old_content":"","_et_gb_content_width":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[],"tags":[676],"coauthors":[],"class_list":["post-3508","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","tag-antiwar-movement"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"meta_box":{"disable_donate_message":"","custom_donate_message":"","subtitle":""},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3508","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/32"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=3508"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3508\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=3508"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=3508"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=3508"},{"taxonomy":"author","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/coauthors?post=3508"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}