{"id":354,"date":"2003-12-17T20:29:31","date_gmt":"2003-12-18T03:29:31","guid":{"rendered":""},"modified":"2003-12-17T20:29:31","modified_gmt":"2003-12-18T03:29:31","slug":"destruction-of-dubrovnik","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/2003\/12\/17\/destruction-of-dubrovnik\/","title":{"rendered":"&#8220;Destruction&#8221; of Dubrovnik"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Reuters&#8217; presstitute Paul Gallagher writes yesterday <a href=\"http:\/\/www.alertnet.org\/thenews\/newsdesk\/L16356275.htm\">about the trial <\/a>of Yugoslav general Pavle Strugar for the alleged destruction of the medieval port of Dubrovnik.<br \/>\nQuite honestly, I didn&#8217;t think even the Hague Inquisition would dare to propagate positions that are so easily verifiable as lies.<br \/>\nNamely, the Inquisitors claim Strugar&#8217;s forces &#8220;mercilessly pounded&#8221; Dubrovnik&#8217;s Old Town, with &#8220;unprecedented ferocity,&#8221; and inflicted &#8220;heavy damage.&#8221; But that is simply not true.<!--more--><\/p>\n<p>&#8220;The people of the world witnessed on their television sets a sustained, senseless shelling of the Old Town of Dubrovnik,\u201d prosecutor Philip Weiner told judges.<br \/>\nAh, so if we&#8217;ve seen something <i>on television<\/i>, it must be true, no? Rubbish. Besides, the TV showed no such thing, because no such thing ever happened.<br \/>\nAs someone who&#8217;s lived through 1326 days of siege warfare in Sarajevo, I know a bit about sustained shelling, and the kind of damage it leaves behind. I&#8217;ve been in Dubrovnik at least twice in the past decade, and I&#8217;ve seen no damage that would point to a pattern of shelling even remotely similar to Sarajevo. In fact, the only completely demolished buildings in Old Town Dubrovnik are the Serbian church and the adjacent icon museum &#8211; and they were demolished <i>from the inside <\/i>.<br \/>\nNow, there are other, <b>modern<\/b> areas of Dubrovnik that were shelled, and several landmark hotels and resorts have been devastated. So, why does the Inquisition not question, investigate or prosecute the shelling of possible non-military targets? Because that doesn&#8217;t sound as useful as &#8220;destruction of priceless old treasures.&#8221; Once again, propaganda takes precedence over truth &#8211; a hallmark of the Hague &#8220;Tribunal.&#8221;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Reuters&#8217; presstitute Paul Gallagher writes yesterday about the trial of Yugoslav general Pavle Strugar for the alleged destruction of the medieval port of Dubrovnik. Quite honestly, I didn&#8217;t think even the Hague Inquisition would dare to propagate positions that are so easily verifiable as lies. Namely, the Inquisitors claim Strugar&#8217;s forces &#8220;mercilessly pounded&#8221; Dubrovnik&#8217;s Old [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":9,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_seopress_robots_primary_cat":"","_seopress_titles_title":"","_seopress_titles_desc":"","_seopress_robots_index":"","_et_pb_use_builder":"","_et_pb_old_content":"","_et_gb_content_width":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[],"tags":[676],"coauthors":[],"class_list":["post-354","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","tag-antiwar-movement"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"meta_box":{"disable_donate_message":"","custom_donate_message":"","subtitle":""},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/354","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/9"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=354"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/354\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=354"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=354"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=354"},{"taxonomy":"author","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/coauthors?post=354"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}